HowardBorden
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Posts
- 889
I agree with most of what you are saying about most being clueless about the SWA pay system. But to be fair, 126TFP equates to a more understandable 110 units of pay converted to hourly.There are plenty of people that are clueless about the SW pay system.
I just finished flying around 85 hours of flight time for Jan, and will be paid 126 trips for pay. Picked up a few trips, some deadheading in there, and that awesome rig of 6.5 per day showed up a few times. No premium and I'll make the equivalent of a 12 year Delta widebody FO. Around 180/hr per hour flown.
Substandard? Hardly. Now I'm all for increasing the retirement component and increasing the pay with at least min COLA raises, but to throw the whole structure under the bus just because you're ex-Tranny is ridiculous.
Parking? Yea that's a huge benefit. Reserve? Maybe we could get airport standby like AirTran had. Give me a break.
Nobody comes close on..
1. Rig per day
2. Codeshare, scope
3. Pay structure in general
I love the trip for pay system. SWA has a huge amount of soft pay involved with it. The rigs are very beneficial and don't even get me started on the value of scope and codeshare, it is incalculable.