Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't wholly disagree- Clinton signed the repeal of glass-steagal- but there is one party in particular that has blocked funding of frank-Dodd - there is one party that refuses to see value in regulating banks and creates this free for all in the banking industry-
But these are details - there is also one party that represents anti-union airline pilots.... And we all know who that is.
Sorry, guys. But don't give up. I remember how depressed the Colgan OC was after their first vote failed by a small margin, and a little over a year later they had a huge majority vote in favor and they were ALPA members. Keep the faith.
When is "next time around"? Who will represent us? With what financial backing? Don't you realize that even if ALPA did us wrong we'd still at least have an agent that we could fire and replace... on their dime, not ours? Now we have exactly nothing, and nobody is going to waste their time and money trying to organize this limp-wristed, Goldilocks pilot group again.
Love the gay bashing.![]()
We were talking about M&A. I'm telling you that ALPA doesn't appear to help. Here's a list of recent wins that ALPA has been a part of;
1. USAIR and Am West. - Disaster
2. TWA and American. - Sued and Convicted of DFR
3. AirTran and SWA. - Steamrolled and on the verge of a staple
4. CAL and United - Jury is still out. Not looking rosy.
True about Glass-Steagal, along with NAFTA and all the other tactics that have been used to break the middle class and bust the unions.
That being said, ALPA sh*t their own nest for so long that I seriously doubt that it will remain a viable entity much longer. You reap what you sow.
I am curious about how the company reacts. Although the percentages imply that this was a "big" win for the company, the underlying anti-ALPA resentment and simple election math really show that this was much closer than it appears:
If 157 pilots would have voted the other way, we'd have ALPA on the property.
157 out of 2100 isn't that many to sway next time around. The company has to know this and unless certain issues get addressed, there will be a next time.
In my opinion, if the company is smart, they throw a few million $ towards the JBPA and say: "Here. Organize. We'll codify everything in the current relationship into a CBA and this headache goes away".
I'm not optiminstic, though.
Where the F' have you been? In-house was tried and failed. Now this. What's next? Teamsters? No thank you.
And your suggestion for an alternative with extensive aviation experience and vast resources would be whom?Dont be ALPA sucks. they would sell you guys down the river in a NY minute.