To clarify
All major airlines managements have supported this bill. For the record, SWA has put out a statement that it is taking a neutral position & is not a party to pushing this bill before congress. The statement said the company had good relations with it's employee groups & didn't feel this bill was necessary. Not every airline company is in support of this legislation, for those who are interested.
For ancedotal info though this type of negotiation process was discussed among many pilots at SWA. It was the thinking that in the case for SWA pilots this method of solving any impasse would eventually be favorable to the pilots. Here's the logic. Contracts have traditionally been negotiated upon the assumption of what other carriers were paying their pilots. If an arbitrator was to look at what other pilots were making, look at the productivity of our group, look at the profitability of the company as compared to others, the assumption leads one to believe if a company offer wasn't industry leading & the pilot offer was close to that or at that, it would be hard for a "take or leave" type arbitrator to not rule in the favor of the pilots. So in the case of the SWA pilot group the passage of this law "might" be good for the pilot group of SWA. Just one person's opinion, not to be used to take one side or the other of the bill. Just one perspective from one SWA pilot.
cheers,
All major airlines managements have supported this bill. For the record, SWA has put out a statement that it is taking a neutral position & is not a party to pushing this bill before congress. The statement said the company had good relations with it's employee groups & didn't feel this bill was necessary. Not every airline company is in support of this legislation, for those who are interested.
For ancedotal info though this type of negotiation process was discussed among many pilots at SWA. It was the thinking that in the case for SWA pilots this method of solving any impasse would eventually be favorable to the pilots. Here's the logic. Contracts have traditionally been negotiated upon the assumption of what other carriers were paying their pilots. If an arbitrator was to look at what other pilots were making, look at the productivity of our group, look at the profitability of the company as compared to others, the assumption leads one to believe if a company offer wasn't industry leading & the pilot offer was close to that or at that, it would be hard for a "take or leave" type arbitrator to not rule in the favor of the pilots. So in the case of the SWA pilot group the passage of this law "might" be good for the pilot group of SWA. Just one person's opinion, not to be used to take one side or the other of the bill. Just one perspective from one SWA pilot.
cheers,