Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska Airlines Pilots Reach an Agreement in Concept on a New Contract

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Chief,

The rumor we’re hearing around AA is 10% immediate pay raise with a 4% increase per year for 4 years plus a $20,000 signing bonus for CA’s and $25,000 signing bonus for FO’s. No change to their retirement benefits.

Here’s how the numbers play out:

12 Year 737 CA FO

Current 154 97
2009 169.40 106.70
2010 176.17 110.97
2011 183.22 115.40
2012 190.17 120.02
2013 198.17 124.82

Current
LUV 198.00 131.00
AA 165.69 112.67

I’ve got to agree with Lorenzo on this one. Overall, looks weak. We’re hearing LUV is currently inking a contract with 3% pay raises (based on profitability), so it basically takes four years for Alaska CA’s just to catch up to LUV's present rate. The FO’s never catch up to LUV.

A 4.0% annual increase is just barely over the current inflation rate. What happens if Barack’s bill causes hyper inflation a few years down the road??
I wonder if their guys will fall for the chump change.

Looks like another big win for management.

AA767AV8TOR

I have no idea about the validity of your numbers however, based on the official e-mails we have already been sent by ALPA

1. FO pay...I am paraphrasing as I don't remember the exact wording, however, ...FO pay is to be restored to the pre-kasher CA to FO ratio. If Kasher had kept the ratio which was 70% for a 12 year FO, then that would put the current 12 year FO rate at 109.19. I keep hearing more senior pilots talke about 65%, however, when I calculate the pre-Kasher numbers the ratio ranges from 70% down to 50% at year 2 and then 30% at year 1. If someone can explain to me how it worked pre-kasher then it would be most helpful. Here is what I figure the FO rates should have been had Kasher respected the traditional ratios between CA and FO rates based on the prekasher/kasher rates available on the MEC website.

YR CUR Should'of
1 35.16 37.82
2 61.67 65.66
3 72.99 79.30
4 80.15 83.69
5 85.66 86.50
6 87.89 90.10
7 89.47 94.55
8 91.07 95.96
9 93.07 99.49
10 94.69 103.83
11 95.94 106.91
12 96.83 109.19

If the AA rumore is correct coupled with the statement from our union I would think that a 12th year FO should make $120 now and then $140 by contract end. No?

2. Retirement - The union also stated that the retirement offerings were in fact changing. From reading between the lines of the e-mail merged with the previous offers from the company I think we are all going to have a choice of staying in the A-plan as is (1.9A%/3%B)...having a combined mini-A/increased B (last known company offer was 1%a/7?%B)...or going to an all B-plan option (last known offer was 12%B).
 
Chief,

I’ve got to agree with Lorenzo on this one. Overall, looks weak. We’re hearing LUV is currently inking a contract with 3% pay raises (based on profitability), so it basically takes four years for Alaska CA’s just to catch up to LUV's present rate. The FO’s never catch up to LUV.

A 4.0% annual increase is just barely over the current inflation rate. What happens if Barack’s bill causes hyper inflation a few years down the road??
I wonder if their guys will fall for the chump change.

Looks like another big win for management.

AA767AV8TOR


AA767,

I agree that if all we see is a 4% increase, then a year over year increase of 4%, it's pretty weak. I dug out Alaska ALPA's short term proposal that was submitted to the NMB in December and the numbers are significantly different.

12 year rates CA/FO

2009 178.03 (up 15%) / 118.58 (up 21%)
2010 185.15 (+4%) / 123.32 (+4%)
2011 192.56 (+4%) / 128.26 (+4%)

These were the rates that ALPA told management were rock bottom. Our next contract is planned to go out further, so I obviously don't know if these will be totally accurate. However, I highly doubt that the MEC is rolling over and playing dead for a simple +4% to start. It will never pass membership ratification and they know it. We also have an intact A & B plan and work rule improvements from what I've heard.

I've said it before, but I'll say it again, until we see the actual TA this whole discussion is merely an exercise in speculation. Glad to see you guys are looking at decent rates for the 737.

CP
 
Last edited:
Nope, nothing yet. The MEC is hoping to get something out before ALPA's support staff people come to self help on their own contract. Getting down to the wire.
 
another bump....

Any word on final language?
 
We just got word that the MEC is meeting Monday to vote on whether or not to send it to vote. If so, we will probably know some numbers by the end of the week. I'm personally not holding my breath for any substantial numbers. After a 34% cut it would take around a 50% raise to get us back to where we WERE. I doubt that's gonna happen any time soon.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top