Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both SWA and Airtran are currently profitable LCCs, with similar type (size) fleets (737s) as the largest aircraft. Both have distinct assets that make each valuable for a merger TOGETHER. Neither are close to BK. One isn't "rescuing" the other. And, I may not see a 1 or 1 in the SLI, but I certainly don't see a staple or even close. I also don't see the arbitrator equating this to the CHQ/Shuttle America merger, more like the USAir/AWA merger. After a certain amount of SWA guys on the top, I see relative from there down. There will be SWA and AT guys at the bottom of the combined list.
Bye Bye---General Lee
The only reason aircraft size has been an issue in the past is because larger aircraft used to pay more. If our narrow bodies pay the same as OAL wide-bodies then for SLI proposes maybe we should consider all of our aircraft wide-bodies. How do you like that logic General? Many of the shrunken heads on this site will freak.
Think about it, why has WB flying mattered in the past? Hint: GL, it isn't because the layovers are better. Not that there is such a thing as better than West Texas.
The International qualified pilots usually go to the top of the list, as in the
USAir/AWA merger.
Expect the international qualified Airtran Captains to be put at the top of the list.
International Captain= Higher career expectations.
The International qualified pilots usually go to the top of the list, as in the
USAir/AWA merger.
Expect the international qualified Airtran Captains to be put at the top of the list.
International Captain= Higher career expectations.
And the difference in pay between Southwest and Airtran now isn't as much of a gap as it used to be, which will probably be looked at