Boy.... How fast you guys have forgotten 9/11....
Ummm... excuse me, but... what the flying FRACK does this have to do with 9/11?
To leave a company with 100 to 300 guys below you to be the most junior guy at a new company because with current pay rates, you may earn more in 20 years??? Hate to say this, but you guys don't learn......
OHHH, OK. I get it. So no one should EVER leave their Regional airline, is that it?
Your logic is faulty. To make a broad generalization you MUST be able to apply that generalization to ALL situations and scenarios and find logic in them.
I find no logic in your argument when applied outside the one unforeseeable event of 9/11 and find absolutely ZERO correlation here.
How many guys left AAI, Alaska, Southwest, or any number of companys that didn't pay what UAL, DAL, NWA, and CAL paid prior to 9/11 to make more money. How many of those guys have just been called back from recal, or left the airline industry all together to make much less than they did before... If they would have stayed at their original airline, they would have ended up making hundreds of thousand more than there gonna make now..
If, If, If.
If management hadn't been so GREEDY, those companies wouldn't have been gutted as they were. Many of the bankruptcy RAPINGS didn't come from being in such dire financial straights that liquidation was just around the corner. Those management groups decided to line their pockets with the grief and aftermath of 9/11.
IF they had been honorable and ethical, those pilots would STILL have made good choices in the long-run with their airline changes.
The grass isn't always greener................Seniority is huge... And if the chit hits the fan next week all those guys who left for greener pastures are gonna get screwed, just like all the junior UAL, NWA, AA, and Cal guys did after 9/11...
You can live your life like that if you want to, I absolutely REFUSE to do so.
If many of us lived that "safely", we'd be still driving Lears 28 days a month with MAYBE 2 or 3 days off to satisfy the 12 off every calendar quarter FAR or flying a B1900 20 days a month for $48k max CA pay at Year 12.
Sorry, but most of us have better career aspirations than that. If it takes a pay cut the first year or two to get to where we want and we start over again, too bad, that's seniority my friend.
If the most junior AAI guys get hosed in the short term, the stability of a truely national LCC will more than likely make up for it in the future..
The word is spelled TRULY. And TRULY, the ONLY way it will "make up for it" in the future is if we are able to negotiate a higher payscale in the future based on a more solid and profitable company. If it does NOT pay more in the future, it will NEVER "make up for it". I enjoy my job, but my enjoyment doesn't feed my family or save enough money to have my house and boat paid off with enough money to enjoy my retirement by the time I'm 60.
AAI will not be able to expand out west without some sort of merger, Alaska and SW would crush AAI out west...
Wow, that's insightful, you should ask World Aviation News if they need someone in their Clairvoyant Department.
A 1-4 integration would not be great for the AAI guys.. 1-5 or 1-6 would be more reasonable.. If you came to AAI just for the 2 1/2 year upgrade, you are extemely short sided and you shouldn't have come in the first place...
Hmmm... How can I say this politely. That would be none of your fracking business. You just described probably 50% or more of the new-hires in the last 3 years who left jobs paying more for the unknown but reasonably foreseeable future with AirTran based on the company's status at the time with existing and future orders.
I believe you lack understanding of how the MAJORITY of pilots choose their future in aviation, or at least your diatribe above supports such a conclusion.
But thanks for the lambasting anyway.
We now return you to your regularly-scheduled programming.
