redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pay for your dog to non rev
Those rates were rejectedn a TA years before the merger. Thiis has been pointed out to you many times, but you're still convinced you're looking at Branson.
Just because you turned them down doesn't mean that's what you were getting paid Sept 2010 does it? You see the stupidity of your argument?
It's best to just smile and nod at him.
Not much different than you telling us had WN not bought us, we'd still be working for the same rates.
You see the stupidity of your argument?
red is functionally retarded. It's best to just smile and nod at him.
Ahhhh, yea... the argument that you would have had new rates even better within months if SW hadn't stepped in.
Do you really believe that, or does it just fit your 'we should have been getting more money anyway' argument?
How long until you got new rates after the SW announcement? Weeks? How long if SW didn't make the announcement? I'd say a year easily.
I'll try to speak slowly for you so you can follow along.....
On Sept 1st, 2010, you were being paid 152/hr for CA rates, and 79/hr for FO rates. Maybe not what you wanted, but that's what it was. It doesn't matter what you turned down or what fantasy rate you thought you should be making. THAT'S WHAT YOU WERE PAID. Tell me I'm wrong....