Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran MEC CYA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The AirTran MEC was hell bent on not negotationing in good faith . They had a full proff plan and no intentions of listening to your NC.

The MEC's position was always reasonable, unlike your union's position of "no harm" being defined as not one pilot on your side ever having less relative seniority the entire length of their careers as a result of the merger.

Why don't you tell this crowd the background of your MEC, and how some of them have such hate for SWA. They threw the AT pilots under the bus, because of there hate for SWA.

Seriously? Who exactly would that be? Most of the MEC members were SWA cheerleaders. Do you really think that a bunch of SWA haters would have approved of your "Round Up" events where you SWAPA execs and NC had full access to our pilot group? When a certain someone told the MEC that such an idea was crazy, every single MEC member told him that he was being too untrusting and that "SWA isn't like that, they won't try to take advantage." The truth is that our MEC was living in a fantasy world, and they didn't wake up to how they were being raped until the deal came back from Dallas.

The AirTran pilots picked the NC.

No, they didn't. The MEC picked them.
 
The truth is that our MEC was living in a fantasy world.


This is where the ALPA dysfunction really shines. Let the MC negotiate with NO updates or input from the MEC, then act shocked when the product is produces.

It was absolutely the MEC's game plan to run the clock out, that might not have been the case until they saw the agreement. But it became the game plan quickly.
 
This is where the ALPA dysfunction really shines. Let the MC negotiate with NO updates or input from the MEC, then act shocked when the product is produces.

Not ALPA dysfunction. MEC dysfunction. No other ALPA MEC has taken so much of a hands-off approach. Our MEC did because of petty politics, and it backfired.

It was absolutely the MEC's game plan to run the clock out, that might not have been the case until they saw the agreement. But it became the game plan quickly.

You keep getting this wrong. There was no plan to run out any clock, either before or after the deal. In reality, one of the main reasons for voting the deal down at the MEC level instead of allowing the pilots to vote it down (as they almost certainly would have done) was because the MEC was concerned about not having enough time, in fact. The timeline was compressed for going to mediation and arbitration, and they didn't want to waste valuable weeks on road shows for an agreement that was going to fail. Those weeks needed to be focused on preparing for mediation and arbitration. So the idea that they were trying to kill time is not only wrong, it's also the opposite of what the MEC was doing.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top