fletch717
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2001
- Posts
- 589
I can't speak for outsiders, but as an employee, the company's always treated me exceptionally well. Far better than any previous airline. I'd love to make you feel better and tell you it's all just a sham, but I'm afraid I can't. I've competed against SWA and seen friends bet against them in the late 90s. All I can say is, more often than not, the company seems to find a way to win. The only difference is which side you're on. You obviously found that out the hard way. I'll always be convinced, however, that SWA initially made you an extremely fair offer. Things went downhill when you and your compadres tried to play poker and lost. I suppose eventually you'll man up and own your role in that fiasco. Until then, hoping for words from the other side to ease your pain won't help.
Based on the sale of the 717 the first offer was a sham. There were no seat protections with the loss of A/C . If you say the 717's were never going to be a part of the fleet, then SWA knowingly duped us into an agreement which they never intended to follow. Some on this board say "WE" should have known the 71 would never stay. That is NOT what we were told by SWA mgmt. We had an airplane that was profitable and no reason to believe SWA would lie. SWA was strong arming us but had yet to Lie, so we bought their story and voted for SIA2. SWA used the threat of getting rid of the 717 and alluded to possible furloughs to get the SIA2 vote yes. So in fact they were talking out of both sides of their mouth. These are the facts and That is why there is a DRC case pending.