Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WF-
I will do just fine as part of SWA. My point is that there is more to this than pay. Longevity has more value than pay.
Some of your co-workers seem to feel that we should just take the money and shut up about seniority. That isn't the way it works. Pay is transient, seniority is not. If pay rates change downward, are you going to give me my seniority back? I don't think so.
Ty,
I posed a valid question - why should your longevity at AAI translate into relative seniority at Southwest, considering you were hired at a smaller, newer company with lower qualifications and were able to achieve seniority faster because of that fact? Still waiting for an answer.
Fraternally,
PapaWoody
What's the big mystery? What do you think I am going to say? I've already said it here about three dozen times, and what has it solved? Nothing, of course.
Let the MC's debate this issue. They'll explain their conclusions. Or the Arbitratrators will. Whatever.
You SWA guys have been pounding on the table for the last 6 weeks telling us we should accept this and that. I'm just countering some of your crap. The issue was dead until a few new guys show up and fanned the flames again.
I don't want to come off as a jerk but you WILL give up relative seniority for our contract and the previledge of working at SWA if they ever combine the two carriers.
STAPLE TY to the bottom.
Pilots are a bunch of morons with no concept of unionism. SWA was a stepping stone to the majors back in the 90's. A PFT outfit. SWA is no better then Airtran. Airtran was on the same path as SWA 10 hrs ago.
Not to worry. The AT LEC cannot "screw" this up. It will be strictly decided by the arbitrator. Seniority will definately be an issue. I would'nt worry about the benefits, they will fall into place naturally enough. It's in no one's interest to have differing pay scales or benefit packages. Especially SW management.
Which part?Pipe Dreams
It should not be a foregone conclusion that arbitration will happen- that's why rationality and a release of any expectations should be paramount
That would be preferable, but any proposed ISL will have to pass a vote of both Pilot groups . . . . .that seems like quite a hurdle.
Heck if that is the case, I will go for 1971.