Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran Furloughs coming

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
No way a paycut will pass. As low as you guys are paid and then throw in inflation and COLA I would bet even money it will not pass, not even close. Shove it up their a$$.
 
After 30 failed years of, 'we don't have to make money, we just have to lose less and out last the other guy,' theory it's time to bury the elimination of overcapacity theory in this business as well. I know it comes from ECON 101 supply and demand, but there is zero evidence that the airline industry that supports the overcapacity theory. Airlines have come and gone since deregulation, but their capacity always gets picked up and more passengers continue to travel on planes with historically high load factors. What makes people think that if any of the usual suspect carriers fail that their capacity won't be replaced? Braniff's capacity was more than suitably replaced by AA, DL, and even WN in Dallas, Pan Am and TWA in NY were replaced by Delta, AA, and even CO in EWR. Eastern in ATL by DL and Air Tran and so on. Pittsburgh and St. Louis are the main two hubsites that have been lost but their capacity has not been lost. The allure of market share and the incredible barriers to entry that this industry creates with acquisition of slots and real estate at airports all add into the likelihood that carriers will move quickly to fill any true voids caused by failed carriers.


I agree, mostly.

However, I think that's different this time is that with fuel prices soaring to permanent, very high levels (if, in fact, they are), US airlines are looking at a permanent contraction of significant levels.

Until they get there, there simply are too many planes chasing too few ticket holders. Now gas may drop, or the "magic fuel" may be developed, and we'll be back to the traditional days of easy entry of new capacity into the market.

Personally, I think those days are pretty much over. Many small and a couple of big airlines are going to fail, and the survivors MAY be able to eek out a small profit from a much smaller passenger base when all is said and done.
 
I agree, mostly.

However, I think that's different this time is that with fuel prices soaring to permanent, very high levels (if, in fact, they are), US airlines are looking at a permanent contraction of significant levels.

Until they get there, there simply are too many planes chasing too few ticket holders. Now gas may drop, or the "magic fuel" may be developed, and we'll be back to the traditional days of easy entry of new capacity into the market.

Personally, I think those days are pretty much over. Many small and a couple of big airlines are going to fail, and the survivors MAY be able to eek out a small profit from a much smaller passenger base when all is said and done.

There is proving to be, in the current airline environment, a lack of new investment capital from equity firms both for new entrants and bankruptcy proceedings. This will likely lead to more failures and capacity reductions, which is the necessary medicine for today's over capacity.

Once capacity is rationalized, Congress must then pass laws restricting new entrants to ensure over capacity from building again and allow pricing control.
 
FO pay is sooooo very insignificant compared to the cost for fuel. I've done some calculations over the last couple of months my pay is always less than 2 bucks per paying passenger.
CA pay is 4-5 bucks per paying passenger.

Management - you have failed to negotiate and you already owe us 3 plus years of back pay. You already have your concessions

NO NEW CONCESSIONS!!!!
 
I've been furloughed before and it hurted more than I ever imagined it would. With that being said, I am in no way EVER going to vote for concessions. We are so underpaid right now, this job isn't worth doing for less than we are getting paid now. I'm not about to be a career FO making $50k a year - that is a salary I can replace. At some point we've got to make a stand.

Maybe we can start with Bob giving back his 4 million dollar bonus...
 
then why don't you step aside and allow one of the FO's that are going to be furloughed to retain their job. Put your money where your mouth is.

RV
 

Latest resources

Back
Top