pilotyip
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 13,629
I read the report
Talk about a thread coming back from the dead. The age 65 thing is over and done with and again I got screwed. The report said there was no statistical significance in the variation between under 60 and over 60. It also said it could be because there was no 121 statical data to make a direct compare and that 135 operated under a different, read looser set of regulations. Enjoy your time a UAL, I tired to get hired there once upon a time.121 and 135 pilots. You mean to tell me that I've posted links to the CAMI reports here at LEAST a dozen times and you haven't even bothered to read them yet? Wow, no wonder why you can claim that this isn't a safety issue; if you don't read the FAA reports that prove that this is a safety issue, the data doesn't exist, right?