Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Age 60 informal poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter 71KILO
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 146

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Abolish the Age 60 Rule for other that Part 91 pilots?

  • Yea

    Votes: 668 35.5%
  • Nay

    Votes: 1,214 64.5%

  • Total voters
    1,882
And i'll give you that, eagle. The age 65 bill would have happened. I just like to point out how much different this career has been for the young generation. Some of it has been out of our control. Much has had the older generation's support.

If we were at all unified between each other and w/ the union leadership (Prater) and these changes happened- they would be easier to swallow. Many changes have absolutely been lobbied for by the senior at our expense.

My continued point is that is no way to run a union industry. The concessions are a direct result of scope violations.
 
Last edited:
The House and Senate passed it 100%.


The American public didn't want some unstable nut-cases in command of American Airliners period!

That is such a huge misrepresentation. People that latch on to the unanimity of the decision really have no idea of the details. The "vote" was a procedural vote in an EMPTY chamber. Everything else that passed in that session was unanimous too because no one was there. If you weren't there to vote no, then you went down as a yes vote -- and NO ONE was there. I cannot believe that our system of government allows this abortion of a procedure.

PIPE
 
For the record unlike you I do not spend my time griping. I accept what happened to me and the rest of us at EAL and go on with my life. You seem to have the market cornered with the moaning and groaning. I don't think I could compete there.

Sorry. I've flown with as many strikers as anybody and I don't believe for a second you don't whine like a baby. Feel free to pretend otherwise here on the internet but many of us know the truth.

It's a clean slate as far as I'm concerned. My scab list is in the trash. You accomplished nothing at EAL and scabs did nothing wrong. Going forward, you are both due the same consideration.
 
You accomplished nothing at EAL and scabs did nothing wrong. Going forward, you are both due the same consideration.

You are correct in the end I think the EAL strike was not a success for ALPA, but you finally showed you true colors with "scabs did nothing wrong."

Have a nice life you future scab, you must be so proud.
 
You are correct in the end I think the EAL strike was not a success for ALPA, but you finally showed you true colors with "scabs did nothing wrong."

Have a nice life you future scab, you must be so proud.

Between you and I, only one of us campaigned for another pilot's job. That would be you via age 65.
 
You are correct in the end I think the EAL strike was not a success for ALPA, but you finally showed you true colors with "scabs did nothing wrong."

Have a nice life you future scab, you must be so proud.

How is it you, and pilots like you, can see perfect black and white when seniority aggression is directed at you, but want to split hairs when you are engaging in the same behavior?
 
And i'll give you that, eagle. The age 65 bill would have happened. I just like to point out how much different this career has been for the young generation. Some of it has been out of our control. Much has had the older generation's support.

If we were at all unified between each other and w/ the union leadership (Prater) and these changes happened- they would be easier to swallow. Many changes have absolutely been lobbied for by the senior at our expense.

My continued point is that is no way to run a union industry. The concessions are a direct result of scope violations.

Heck of a "brotherhood" ain't it?.....
 
Joe- you have taken this argument to a place you don't deserve to go.

I am not in agreement w/ the RJDC.

Plus you vote republican and that bit of martyrdom is screwing all of us. But hey- super rich ceo's aren't getting taxed- that's good, right?.... it'll trickle down
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom