j41driver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2002
- Posts
- 1,300
Too, it is based on age rather that health or competency.
Can someone explain to me how Age 65 is not based on age?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too, it is based on age rather that health or competency.
Actually, I'm not angry that it's being challenged, nor am I planning to work to 60, let alone 65.
You could say we learned something from your generation.
Freightdog: I really don't understand your post.
As you have pointed out I have retired and at age 60, just as you want everyone to do (except you I would guess from your post).
I've gotten a mostly non-flying job now and moved to a house. Yes, I have purchased clothing at the Salvation Army as you have pointed out but now that I'm working I'm able to buy most things at Walmart. Is that OK with you?
My post #39 is part of a press release that sez the age 60/65 law is being challenged. So what's your problem?
You have everything, I'm a beaten man. Beaten by you, the FAA, your "get out of my seat" colleagues and your Union. Please keep in mind that all the while I still have a family that includes a 16-year old son. My son will be going to the Community College instead of U of I. Is that OK too? On the other hand you now have the opportunity to work 5-extra years if you so choose. From your post it sounds as though you're angry that the age 65 law is being challanged. I guess that's because you now want to work to age 65. That figures!
Do you go down to the streets and kick the homeless on your days off?
Freightdog: I really don't understand your post.
As you have pointed out I have retired and at age 60, just as you want everyone to do (except you I would guess from your post).
I've gotten a mostly non-flying job now and moved to a house. Yes, I have purchased clothing at the Salvation Army as you have pointed out but now that I'm working I'm able to buy most things at Walmart. Is that OK with you?
My post #39 is part of a press release that sez the age 60/65 law is being challenged. So what's your problem?
You have everything, I'm a beaten man. Beaten by you, the FAA, your "get out of my seat" colleagues and your Union. Please keep in mind that all the while I still have a family that includes a 16-year old son. My son will be going to the Community College instead of U of I. Is that OK too? On the other hand you now have the opportunity to work 5-extra years if you so choose. From your post it sounds as though you're angry that the age 65 law is being challanged. I guess that's because you now want to work to age 65. That figures!
Do you go down to the streets and kick the homeless on your days off?
I have heard this before from many on this Board as well as from thousands of others on the line. It's just BS and you don't even know it. Almost no one retires early when they have reached a senior position. I am well aware of the constant complaining that goes with the job and part of that is the "I can't wait to retire and get out of this crap," or the "I'm not going to wait for age 60, l want to retire at age 55 when I can still enjoy life." Don't you understand that that is just part of the stereotypical cockpit conversation that is expected? Very few, to almost no one, really act on this fantasy. The truth is that almost everyone, unless there is some horrible commute or a personal situation at home will retire "early." I guess you haven’t figured this out yet. Your sincerity in your belief that you will retire early is so naive that it is actually quite funny to me. Of yes, I’m sure you will disagree with me and so will others from your group of young pilots, but I ask that you remember this posting when you’re age 64 and still flying. You’ll get a big laugh too.
Yeah. I'll get a big laugh when my B-Fund has been frozen since 2009 and my upgrade was 5 years late. I'll laugh at every contract negotiation as we fight the management contention that we "get" to work for 5 more years so we don't need this or that. I'll be laughing as loss of license/medical premiums go up due to the 60-65 year olds. I'll be laughing my a$$ off as I work 5 more years for free to recover what has been lost on the front end to the greediest generation. Yeah, you're right - that's really hilarious. Don't be an idiot!
PIPE
Amen Skyboy!
Unfortunately, it will fall on deaf ears, or blind eyes in this case. It's all about UF and how he's been wronged by everybody. Now he's homeless, and we're all bad guys.
No, I'm not homeless, I'm planeless!
And to anyone who has been earning over $200,000 annually for 15 to 20 years, and are now broke, and retired, I shed not one tear for you. You blew all your money, and it's nobodies fault except your own.
I pretend my retirement with my company doesn't exist. I also exclude social security. If either of those come through, hurray, I get to drink Sam Adams instead of Keystone Light. But if anything should be learned by this entire fiasco, and the shakeup of the airlines over the last 6 years, it's SAVE YOUR MONEY.