You wrote, and I quote, (again!!!!) that I was "flouting" the Delta pay scales. Why would I insult my own pay scale? You used the word wrong. I called you on it. I didn't make a big deal of it, just a little joke. Yet you took it and ran with it. You were wrong. Admit it. You got mad because you felt (wrongly) that I was bragging about our pay. You tried to put me down for it. You used the word flout. Then you got your trusty dictionary out and said "you say tout, I say flout" indicating that they were the same thing. They are not. They are complete opposites. If you can't even admit that, then I don't know why I am bothering.
On the PEX, you did change. You insisted over and over again that the UAL guys hurt the FAL guy's bargaining power when PEX bought them. When I explained to you that your statement was impossible because PEX bought FAL before UAL ever made an offer (even supplying dates), and in fact UAL made an offer TO PEX to buy FAL, you changed your story to say that UAL made several offers for FAL. Not true. There was some discussion of a buy and leaseback plan with UAL, but that was only in the content of an ESOP at FAL. I believe your quote was "by UAL leading them around by the shorthairs until their cash position dwindled and they had no leverage when PEX bought them" You also said the "the ual offer came BEFORE burr and lorenzo. Once again, you were wrong. Admit it. For someone who brags so much about having been in the industry so long, you weren't paying much attention, were you?
By the way, as I already wrote, I complimented you on your strike way back in our second post. Yet you say you "finally" get a compliment on your strike. Is your victim complex that large that it affects your memory? I wrote, and will write again, that you guys were courageous. lorenzo, the courts, the politicions, and mostly the scabs beat you. I wish they hadn't. So does they rest of the industry. I feel for what you went through. You know as well as I do that if the scabs hadn't taken your job, you might have had a chance. Unlike you, I don't care why they crossed. I will not offer opinions on the mindset of a scab. Maybe ALPA screwed them. So what. They did not hurt ALPA, they hurt you. They stole the job that you earned. Don't give them an excuse. ALPA has wronged many people. We should address that. But not in the concept of excusing scabs.
By the way, I was 17 and interested in aviation during the EAL strike. I didn't need my father to explain it to me. I could read at the time (you should learn. It's helpful). My sisters knew nothing about the strike, because my father wasn't "abusive" and intertwine them in it. I, however, was very interested, almost an adult, and knowledgeable. I convinced my father to let me volunteer with him at the strike headquarters, and I learned a lot. Not because my father made me, but because i wanted to.
Your method is to placate scabs, mine is to ostracize them. I think my method is more in line with the attitude of most ALPA members. I think it is working. How many crossed during the NWA or CMR strike? Now don't get me wrong. I know that we must not alienate our members. If people have concerns, they should be addressed. Before any strike. But once they cross a line, there should be no forgiving. I certainly don't think they should be MEC members!
My screen name is copied from a neon sign in Atlanta. I like the sign and am proud of my airline. If I had used "I Fly Delta Jets" then perhaps you would have a point. Is "boeingman" an attempt to impress people? Oooohh, so you realllly fly boeings? See, it works both ways. By the way, I have a beautiful new bride and am happily married, so no, I am not using the internet to pick up chicks.
About my flyforums posts. #!. I asked, and I quote, "Where is CAL getting the cash to buy anything? I think they are more likely a buyee than a buyer." I felt then, and now, that your cash position and higly leveraged balance sheet would prevent you from buying anyone right now. Perhaps I am wrong. That's why I asked. You people came back and called me a DBA, etc. The insults came from your end first. I responded to them. Then tried to steer the conversation back towards civility. I even apologized for a line I used that upset people. I answered every post in a civilized and intelligent manner, and no one seemed to offer me the same courtesy. When I was called a "suicide terrorist" I announced i was leaving. And did. The fact that I stopped reading the thread did prevent me from responding to anything that followed my departure. Funny how that works, isn't it? That whole chronology thing really confuses you, doesn't it. Since we started this inane conversation I went back and re-read the wonderful post that you claimed I was scared of. Big deal. He wrote that DAL hired bad lawyers and did unethical things during the PAA deal. So what. That was Ron Allen. You will NEVER hear me defend him! What the hell did that have to do with the original conversation? I never said DAL was perfect, least of all the management. That was the big scary post that you claim scared me away because I was overmatched? Please. It is very rare that I am overmatched in a debate. I think this thread proves that! Thanks for your help, by the way.
Back to your jumpseat story. Am I a captain? No. Never claimed I was, and you probably knew I wasn't due to my age. Yet you seem to think that the actions of one A$$hole that denied you the jumpseat can be attributed to our entire pilot group. You accuse me of insulting the CAL pilots. In fact, I have never done that. I am polite and kind to every CAL pilot I see wearing an ALPA pin. They are ALWAYS welcome on our airplanes, and every captain I have ever flown with agrees. We have had many a cal pilot in our jumpseat, and they have all been gentleman. My words and actions refute your assertion that I insult the CAL pilots. I do insult the scabs, but ALWAYS go out of my way, like I have during this post, to compliment the rest of the CAL pilots. You, on the other hand, do exactly what you accuse me of doing. You have held the actions of one a$$hole against the entire group. You will not allow a DAL pilot a jumpseat (your words, not mine) because of one guy's action. You get offended when, in response to an insult, i pointed out the history of 1200 of the CAL pilots, yet you play jumpseat politics based on one guy? Wasn't our a$$hole doing exactly what you are? Yet you feel justified. Interesting.
Regarding the EAL strike. I agree that the IAM was out of control when Borman was Chairman. After lorenzo took over, however, they didn't have a chance to be out of control. lorenzo wanted them to strike. he was after the NMB at every opportunity to declare an impass. They would not for months, because he wouldn't even negotiate. He wanted to impose a contract and hire scabs, exactly like what happened at CAL. Meanwhile, he was stealing all of EAL's assets and transferring them. He was going to do the same thing to the pilots when their contract came up. He had done it at every airline he ever ran, and the pilots knew it. "Faught from the inside" with lorenzo? Are you kidding me? The pilots had two choices. Fight alongside the IAM, or fight alone later. There can be no doubt that lorenzo would try to bust their union when the contract was up. I don't see how the pilots had a choice. There had to be a strike, it was only a matter of when.
No, I'm not based in CVG.
You have a MASSIVE inferiority complex regarding Delta Air Lines. i can't count the amount of times you and your message board cronies accused me of having a big ego just because I work for Delta. Is Delta that good? I never said that, so you must infer it. You call me arrogant, and even ask if I am trying to impress people by putting the word "delta" in my screen name. You seem to have issues with Delta. Not sure why.
You mention that Delta has never been tested. You are correct that throughout Delta's history, the pilots have always been treated very well. That all changed with Ron Allen, and I am proud of the way DALPA has performed since then. They have paid 100% of the medical benefits through 2 furloughs, they stuck together during the 777 negotiations, even after Leo cancelled some orders. In doing so, the "Delta Dot" was created, which led the way to UAL's historic contract (no prob zara!). They stuck together during the c2k negotiations, even after management sued some of our members, and achieved the highest paying contract in the history of US aviation. Have we been tested with a strike? Not yet, but speaking as a strikecenter volunteer, we were ready. We have been tested. And we have responded. No need to thank us for establishing a payrate you can use in your bargaining. No need to thank us for the help the DALPA negotiating team has already given to your negotiating team. There is no need to thank us, but it would be nice.
In your haste to defend a group of scabs, you have managed to insult, alienate, and deny jumpseats to entire pilot groups, most of whose members you have never met. For some reason, the scabs sins have become forgivable, but the rest of ALPA's sins are not. I find it curious.
I have never insulted an entire pilot group intentionally, and when I did it inadvertantly, I apologized. You, on the other hand, insult the DAL and UAL pilots with every post. You are trying to play the victim, but people see through it. I have no doubt that you will come back, but I think perhaps before you type, a little self-study might be in order. You insulted entire ALPA groups, I insulted scabs while praising the rest of the pilots of the airline. Perhaps we were both wrong. If so, I think your's was the much greater sin. I am quite certain you'll disagree.