AA cant take the heat

[PropsR4Boats]

If that where true where is th flood of DAL, AA, AWA, USA, NWA, etc. flights into HOU.

 

[SWA tech]

What you don't realize is...

UAL will fly to Love not DFW
.
DAL will fly to Love not DFW

NWA will fly to Love not DFW

CAL will fly to Love not DFW

AWA/USA will fly to Love not DFW

AAI will fly to Love not DFW

F9 will fly to Love not DFW

Southwest should be cafeful or they may just get what they wish for
__________________
And the truth shall set you free


We realize it so bring it to love field, just drop the wright ammendment already

 

[furloughfodder]

Don't worry. The WA will not get overturned with the current administration in place in Washington DC.

AA is much too powerful right now, trust me.

 

[aa73]

The Wright ammendment needs to go away, and it will go away. SWA has incredible pull on Capitol Hill.

Anything that involves reducing fares in a high-fare market (i.e. DFW) will eventually fly.

I think it's pretty safe to say that SWA will get its way, and AA is going to need to come up with some way to compete against them, with the mass influx of pax at Love Field when the thing gets dropped. May you live in interesting times...

73

 

[Heavy Set]

What you don't realize is...

UAL will fly to Love not DFW
.
DAL will fly to Love not DFW

NWA will fly to Love not DFW

CAL will fly to Love not DFW

AWA/USA will fly to Love not DFW

AAI will fly to Love not DFW

F9 will fly to Love not DFW

Southwest should be cafeful or they may just get what they wish for

Well, the passengers will benefit from more choice then - and all of those carriers will have to reduce their fares to SWA levels to be competitive out of Love... Good luck.

I agree with On Your Six, not flying on those old, run-down MD80s will be a joy for almost everyone... The Wright Amendment is an anachronism and an outdated barrier to consumer choice - a barrier that AA supports... That's pathetic, anti-capitalistic and an embarrassment to anyone who works for AA.

 

[OffHot]

And that is different from what? Don't believe SWA is the only airline a MDW, BWI, or HOU. SWA could also fly to ATL, BOS, etc. Oh yea FLYBY, your RJ has done a lot to advance this profession, taking mainline routes for half the pay. That is advancing the cause.

 

[TexaSWA]

AA is no angel, but Southwest is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Nice flip-flop and the Dallas Love restrictions, though.

When it comes to competing with other companies, SWA is definitely a wolf. A wolf dressed like a wolf.

To the consumer SWA is a sheep. Sometimes dressed like Elvis.

 

[TexaSWA]

last I heard the 737-700 (which will make up most of the fleet within a few years) ..."

Our fleet has been mostly 700s since early this year.

 

[N1kawotg]

Cal already flys to DAL in Expressjet. If everyone went to DAL which won't happen anyway, city would not let it with the current restrictions on # of flts. Besides, the people already go to other cities beyond the wright amendment now, however they buy two tickets. Just commuted up to MDW from DAL. Went thru LIT, about 10 people got off then got back in line going to STL, MCI, and MDW. So, its not like those people are going to DFW anyway. This rule change will benefit consumers, which should be the point.

 

[apdsm]

To me SWA has a few things in common with Wal-Mart. They enter markets, offer the same or similar products at lower prices and that causes other companies to go out of business. In some cases these companies don't go out of business but merely downsize, or restructure their expenses (labor included).

Really? Name one company SWA has caused to go out of business. What about the legacy carriers? Have they caused any companies to go out of business?

If they were to run a competitor out of business in a certain market, I would hope they would increase their fares in that market. What's wrong with maximizing profits?

SWA business model is to provide low fare transportation, not to charge the highest price the market will bear.

 

[scoreboard]

Flyby, you Hypocrite

FLYBY, Here is a copy of a post you made a while back, begging for flight info on SWA. Not to Walmart for you then, a buddy?

Hi, I am looking to catch a ride to LAS from SAT on 2/21 but will not be in uniform. Is that going to be a problem with SWA? I couldn't find any non-rev info on the web site.

Anyone have load info on flt 711 or 2781 on the 21st?

Thanks!!

btw, i fly for a large 121 'regional'.

 

[flyby]

Relax

FLYBY, Here is a copy of a post you made a while back, begging for flight info on SWA. Not to Walmart for you then, a buddy?

Scoreboard,
You seem a little sensitive to my analogy about wal-mart and SWA. Enigma brought up wal-mart and I made a post that 'ran' with this comparison. I thought I was being complimentary speaking of how they (SWA) are remarkable. I meant that in a flattering way. Let me say it again, in a different way. I admire the fact they can be profitable while offering low fares. Does that clear things up a tad?

Allow me to elaborate my original point to clarify. The public has decided that low fares are more important than anything else... for the most part. So, we give them those fares. SWA does it profitably and if other carriers wish to match, and try to retain their market share, they will have to operate in the red. Would I expect SWA to raise their fare structure to allow more of the other carriers to be profitable? Heck no. They have been operating as a tremendous success on that model, why change? SWA has a low cost model, other carriers match that model and now they're taking pillows off airplanes. What next? Bring your own seat? Maybe the other carriers should have tried to compete on something other than fare... but, once again, that's what the public values most.

Fastforward a few years, competitors are getting leaner and meaner and there are more profits (albeit modest) to go around. What have we accomplished? The price of fuel is up, costs are rising slowly and I fear that Big profits from an airline, any airline, is a thing of the past. Would that make airline stock a good investment? How about the salaries and wages at these airlines? Compensation across the board has declined. There are certainly other factors (affecting compensation) but low fares in a high cost environment is one of them.

When I started this career it was my dream to work for SWA. I am customer-driven, I actually care about people. Unfortunately for me, I'll probably never get a chance. I envy those that have.

good luck!

 

[shroomwell]

I say repeal the amendment. However the 32 gate restriction has to be lifted and I say Southwest's current gates have to go out to bid. Those gates become much more valuable with the WA lifted. Just lifting the WA and letting SWA keep the gates is akin to a monopoly. JMHO

 

[seefive]

i agree that the WA probably should go away over time. But I also believe SWA should give up all their gates there and the city of Dallas should distribute them fair and equitably. SW wouldn't have all the gates there if the legacy airlines of old weren't forced to go to DFW years ago. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Although you should try. AA is trying their best to keep the WA in place because that benefits them. If SWA really wanted to compete, which they don't, they would move to DFW.

 

[mdf]

i agree that the WA probably should go away over time. But I also believe SWA should give up all their gates there and the city of Dallas should distribute them fair and equitably. SW wouldn't have all the gates there if the legacy airlines of old weren't forced to go to DFW years ago. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Although you should try. AA is trying their best to keep the WA in place because that benefits them. If SWA really wanted to compete, which they don't, they would move to DFW.

AA made the market in DFW, SW made the market at DAL. I say it is time for both sides to play their respective hands without the other crying about it. Giving gates back is akin to giving little johnny another chance on his exam because he couldn't cut it the first time around.