This is gonna take a while. Some things are being forgotten:
Great idea, but regardless of what you come up with it’s not your decision. The man makes the decision. Yes, that sucks but it’s his money and his people will integrate us as best suited for the company, not the pilots or anyone else.
That's not *ENTIRELY* accurate. What management *MIGHT* do right now, or in the new future, may be totally changed by Pinnacle's contract talks, once they re-commence (likely next year). So what changes / integration might happen in the next 90-120 days might only last 6-8 months, depending on the pace of negotiations.
You guys just don't get it. There is Labor involved here. It's not that easy to do what all you 9E guys think is going to happen. You'll see very shortly that 1 list will be the most likely scenario.
I seriously doubt it. Knowing how PCL management operates, I see the likely combination of Colgan and Mesaba as has already been discussed, the transfer of the jets to PCL, and the operation of separate companies as long as management can get away with it (i.e., until negotiations forces one list).
Next upcoming vacancies, all super senior pilots at Mesaba will bid to get on the CRJs, if they aren't already there. Who will stay in a turboprop that is slated to be killed end of 2011? So then you have the top top most senior pilots at XJ, all on the jets, looking for *some* way to come over in an asset transfer. Fine. Assume it happens. Just how can you possibly fairly integrate the 9E group with the most top senior Mesaba pilots that will come with the jets? If there is any 10+ year CA at Mesaba on the Saab, he will be bidding for the jet. Your future at the all-jet Pinnacle is far better than the all-prop Mesaba, considering Mesaba will lose the Saabs with the current Delta deal. There is no fair way to integrate a top super senior group within the 9E ranks.
Most accurate post thus far.
Excerpt from Mesaba's Section 1 (scope)
D. Transfer of Company Aircraft
1. If the Company or its parent sells, transfers, or disposes of
over forty percent (40%) of the aircraft in the Company’s
fleet (in a single transaction or multi-step transaction within
a rolling twelve (12) month period) as a going concern to an
air carrier, directly or indirectly, the Company or its parent
will, as a condition of the sale, require the purchaser to offer
employment to those pilots assigned to that portion of the
fleet at the time of the sale.
2. The provisions of this paragraph D. shall not apply to (i) the
return of aircraft to the lessor, sublessor, or sub-sublessor
of such aircraft, (ii) retirement of aged aircraft in the
ordinary course of business, (iii) a transfer made at the
direction of a party who has an ownership, leasehold, or
security interest in the aircraft and over which the Company
or its parent has no control, (iv) a transfer in which the
Company or its parent does not receive any direct or
indirect compensation from the transferee for the value of
the aircraft, and (v) any transfer in a bankruptcy, insolvency,
or other similar proceeding.
So it has to be more than 40% not including retired aircraft to trigger the "offer of employment"? According to APC Mesaba currently has 41 900's 19 200's and 28 Saabs for a total of 88 airframes. Colgan currently has 14 Q's and 34 Saabs for a total of 48. Total airframes after the merger will be 136.
40% of 136 is 54. Not quite enough to bring the all of the jets over. However, Colgan will be adding 15 Q's between AUG 2010 and April 2011 to bring the total to 151. 40% of 151 is 60. Mesaba just happens to have 60 jets.
According to paragraph D2 this "The provisions of this paragraph D. shall not apply to (i) thereturn of aircraft to the lessor, sublessor, or sub-sublessor of such aircraft, (ii) retirement of aged aircraft in the ordinary course of business." So (subject to legal interpretation) the retiring of the Saabs will not count towards the 40%?
It looks like the Mesaba pilots are in a really bad spot.
Ahhh, one of the meat and bones of the issue. You're forgetting, however, one important thing. PCL wasn't Mesaba holdings. By selling Mesaba to Pinnacle, without successorship language, that paragraph will likely become null and void. Don't think so? Ask yourself how every OTHER end-run around Scope protections has been accomplished in the last decade. PCL management ALREADY DID THIS with Colgan, the language was very clear, and management got away with it. It will happen again,,, you're simply being naive if you think it won't.
What WILL be interesting is the reciprocal letter of Agreement between Mesaba and Pinnacle. THIS is where job protections will come into play. "If any one company suffers a loss of flying and/or aircraft and the OTHER company gains a windfall of flying and/or aircraft, the pilots will have the ability to transfer companies".
I highly suggest you guys to look at that LOA. It was inked while I was still there, and I guarantee you that if they shift a large number of the RJ's over to PCL, it *WILL* trigger this LOA, as it *SHOULD*.
Don't get the idea that I'm against Mesaba pilots, I have a LOT of friends over there, as well as a LOT of friends still at PCL. I'm just dealing in reality here... and the reality is that, short-term, you'd better get used to the idea of an asset transfer without integration by anything other than that LOA. If management can figure out a way to bring as few pilots over and take the most junior pilots they can get, they certainly will. I wouldn't be surprised to see a seat lock for that trigger effective on the day the sale was announced. I also wouldn't be surprised to see management say that if you change companies, it voids your flow-through rights.
You heard it here first...
