Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

30 year Career: US Legacies vs Emirates/Qatar/Ethiad

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
This is a ridiculous assertion and most myopic! Outside of America (for some I know it's hard to think outside of our borders) many pilots start as cadets and progress up the left seat LONG before their counterparts in the USA do!

Witness Air France 447
 
they're great, but they usually lack experience and haven't been proven as captains... it's usually a good idea to get someone who's made it in the left seat at a 50 seat airline flying domestic before you take them to fly all over the world and oceanic not to mention make their first left seat a A320, 767 or bigger.. There are some RJ FO's Im sure hired at legacy airlines but they're very few are are probably VERY well connected or of the right gender.
You make it sound like a RJ FO making the left seat is a skillful thing, whereas it's all 100% seniority in an industry that has no movement. I'm sure you've noticed by now the glut of RJ FOs who are hitting 5-9+ years with no upgrade in sight at their respective airline.
 
You make it sound like a RJ FO making the left seat is a skillful thing, whereas it's all 100% seniority in an industry that has no movement. I'm sure you've noticed by now the glut of RJ FOs who are hitting 5-9+ years with no upgrade in sight at their respective airline.

bottom line.... get the experience as a captain of small plane before they give you the keys to the big one, it's common sense.
 
bottom line.... get the experience as a captain of small plane before they give you the keys to the big one, it's common sense.

Fair enough, but if the opportunity came up for something bigger and better than permanent RJ FO, one should take it too. I know of a 9E FO with no TPIC hired at Hawaiian recently.
 
Fair enough, but if the opportunity came up for something bigger and better than permanent RJ FO, one should take it too. I know of a 9E FO with no TPIC hired at Hawaiian recently.

Huge difference in FO's mind you. Some have 10 years and several types, international exp, etc. others might have 2000tt all in one type in and out of 7 airporrs.

Example is a classmate of mine who had 3 types, 3 airlines to include DC10 at Omni flying world wide. His breadth of experience more than makes up for no TPIC.
 
Last edited:
Huge difference in FO's mind you. Some have 10 years and several types, international exp, etc. others might have 2000tt all in one type in and out of 7 airporrs.

Example is a classmate of mine who had 3 types, 3 airlines to include DC10 at Omni flying world wide. His breadth of experience more than makes up for no TPIC.

More experience is great, but we both know getting a job at a legacy/major is about who you know, and not how many types or oceanic crossings you have. This is why places like Hawaiian, Delta, United, American have all hired regional pilots with as low as 2000tt.
 
Huge difference in FO's mind you. Some have 10 years and several types, international exp, etc. others might have 2000tt all in one type in and out of 7 airporrs.

Example is a classmate of mine who had 3 types, 3 airlines to include DC10 at Omni flying world wide. His breadth of experience more than makes up for no TPIC.

So who's more experienced:

A 3000 hour RJ FO who flight instructed, got hired at 1500 hours and now flies for a US regional airline

or

A 3000 hour B-777 or heavy 'bus FO with Etihad or Emirates who started there as a cadet with 200 hours?
 
So who's more experienced:

A 3000 hour RJ FO who flight instructed, got hired at 1500 hours and now flies for a US regional airline

or

A 3000 hour B-777 or heavy 'bus FO with Etihad or Emirates who started there as a cadet with 200 hours?

This is kind of like asking...which came first...the chicken or the egg.

Both ways seem to work just fine. There are some minor differences. Until you observe both types of training/experience models with an open mind, you will always think that your way is the right way.
 
This is kind of like asking...which came first...the chicken or the egg.

Both ways seem to work just fine. There are some minor differences. Until you observe both types of training/experience models with an open mind, you will always think that your way is the right way.



That's exactly my point. Up until I left the US to fly abroad, I was convinced that the US way was the only right way.

Right now, I fly with mostly European or local FO's who tend to be highly competent, good pilots, good decision-makers, but only have like 3000 hours. Ironically, most of the European guys started flying Boeings with 200-300 hours, and I'd have no qualms putting my family onboard their plane.
 
So who's more experienced:

A 3000 hour RJ FO who flight instructed, got hired at 1500 hours and now flies for a US regional airline

or

A 3000 hour B-777 or heavy 'bus FO with Etihad or Emirates who started there as a cadet with 200 hours?

Depends on the job. If you're going to fly for Southwest or Hawaiian on inter-Island then id say the former. If you're going to work for FedEx, a legacy into a wide body or flying a GV then is say the latter.

sadly as the posted above noted however there are too many HR depts that value experience far less that "who you know" or what your demographic is.
 
Depends on the job. If you're going to fly for Southwest or Hawaiian on inter-Island then id say the former. If you're going to work for FedEx, a legacy into a wide body or flying a GV then is say the latter.

sadly as the posted above noted however there are too many HR depts that value experience far less that "who you know" or what your demographic is.

I know a turboprop only Captain who went to right seat of a 747 classic at a cargo airline here in the US. It all depends. Fortunately, airlines usually don't care about what turbine your turbine time is. Jet or turboprop, unless a job requires specific hours in a specific type (like 500 hrs jet PIC).
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom