10 JAN 2007 NTSB determines cause of fatal CRJ crash in Jefferson City

[falcon20driver]

http://aviation-safety.net/news/newsitem.php?id=1757

 

[othello]

10 JAN 2007 NTSB determines cause of fatal CRJ crash in Jefferson City
The NTSB has reached its probable cause statement and safety recommendations regarding the October 14, 2004 accident at Jefferson City involving a CRJ accident: The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable causes of this accident were (1) the pilots' unprofessional behavior, deviation from standard operating procedures, and poor airmanship, which resulted in an in-flight emergency from which they were unable to recover, in part because of the pilots' inadequate training; (2) the pilots' failure to prepare for an emergency landing in a timely manner, including communicating with air traffic controllers immediately after the emergency about the loss of both engines and the availability of landing sites; and (3) the pilots' failure to achieve and maintain the target airspeed in the double engine failure checklist, which caused the engine cores to stop rotating and resulted in the core lock engine condition. Contributing to this accident was 1) the engine core lock condition, which prevented at least one engine from being restarted, and 2) the airplane flight manuals that did not communicate to pilots the importance of maintaining a minimum airspeed to keep the engine cores rotating. (NTSB)

Not Good For 9E, throws there pilots and trainning department under the bus.

 

[rickair7777]

Wow. Did "Unprofessional Behavior" previously exist as a probable cause, or did the NTSB create it just for this accident?

 

[xjhawk]

1) the pilots' unprofessional behavior



ouch

 

[PCL_128]

F'n idiots....

Darwinism at its best here. At least the world is a little safer now.

B

.......

Nevermind. You're not worth it.

 

[mamba20]

Wow. Did "Unprofessional Behavior" previously exist as a probable cause, or did the NTSB create it just for this accident?

Either way, its a sad truth to the event.

 

[siucavflight]

F'n idiots....

Darwinism at its best here. At least the world is a little safer now.

B

You sir are a tool.

 

[joe_pilot]

.......

Nevermind. You're not worth it.

Ditto.

Some people are morons, ya know?

 

[FmrFreightDog]

I think these guys have been crucified enough. Oh, yeah... and they're both dead. One more time... They are both dead. That ought to be enough to settle your "cosmic scoreboard". Congratulations. You are not, at present, no longer among the living, Count yourself as a better pilot if you must.

Yeah. They messed up. They messed up huge. They paid for the mistakes in full, but if it makes you feel like more of a man, go ahead and piss on the graves.

Can we please put this accident to bed. They've more than paid for their mistakes, no matter how egregious they were.

 

[DrewBlows]

The fact that the NTSB cited "the pilots' unprofessional behavior, deviation from standard operating procedures, and poor airmanship..." is curious. It's a major departure from the usual restating of the facts (think "pilot failed to maintain directional control" when an airplane departs a runway). Is this a new direction of the NTSB? Do they think that this kind of probable cause is more useful than simply restating what happened? I don't know, but I'd be interested in an interview with the authors of the report.