Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest won.

  • Thread starter Thread starter atldc9
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 34

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

atldc9

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
344
Relax TY, it's over.



By Ted Evanoff
[email protected]
December 16, 2004


ATA Airlines accepted Southwest Airlines' offer to buy six of its 14 gates at Chicago Midway, an attorney for rival bidder AirTran Airways said late Wednesday night.

ATA's decision must still be accepted by ATA creditors, the city of Chicago and U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Basil Lorch III.

If the deal is accepted, ATA would remain a national carrier at Midway rather than scaling back to a regional carrier, as proposed in the AirTran bid.

The decision appears to put the 7,700-employee Indianapolis airline on track to link tightly to the larger and more financially stable low-fare carrier from Texas.

Southwest would take a 27 percent stake in ATA and, with creditors, would have a say in naming its board and key executives, AirTran attorney Dick McGurno said.

ATA would remain headquartered in Indianapolis and operate as a publicly traded independent company.

ATA put its prized Midway gates up for sale in a bankruptcy auction as a way to raise cash so it could come out of bankruptcy and regroup as a smaller carrier.

Southwest would buy the six gates for more than $117 million, which includes a $30 million investment that represents 27 percent of ATA, McGurno said.

Southwest would also participate in a code-sharing deal that would enable passengers to buy one ticket and fly on either airline on certain flights from Midway.

While ATA would use the cash to regroup, it may scale back or defer the expansion at Indianapolis International Airport contemplated in the proposed deal with AirTran. Under that proposal, ATA would have sold off the Midway hub and focused its operations at Indianapolis.

Roxanne Butler, ATA investor relations specialist, said airline executives would probably make a public statement after Lorch's 9:30 a.m. hearing today in Indianapolis. She would not disclose the nature of the statement.

ATA executives could not be reached for comment Wednesday night. The company's lawyers declined to comment.

"It's all over," McGurno said about 10 p.m. Wednesday, after negotiations ended in the offices of Baker & Daniels, the Indianapolis law firm representing ATA. "We just congratulated Southwest and wished them the best of good fortune."

AirTran will receive a $3.5 million breakup fee from ATA for its efforts. The Orlando airline's offer as of the bid deadline Dec. 10 was $89.9 million for all 14 ATA Chicago gates plus slots at New York LaGuardia and Reagan National in Washington.

Southwest Chief Executive Gary Kelly on Tuesday described Southwest's bid as an effort to expand at Midway and also inject cash into ATA -- but not control the Indianapolis carrier. "We are not taking over ATA," Kelly said.

AirTran officials, however, drew a different conclusion.

"I don't believe it" when Southwest says it doesn't want control, AirTran marketing director Tad Hutchinson said. "From what was in that document, it looks to us like they want control."

Southwest's investment would amount to a 27 percent stake in ATA stock that Southwest could sell at a later date. AirTran's McGurno said this was scaled back from a 35 percent stake considered Tuesday.

Although such a stake would give Southwest one of the largest blocks of ATA stock and enable it to influence the board of directors, Kelly said ATA would remain independent and not be subject to Southwest's control.

"It's an effort to assist ATA and not take control of ATA," Kelly said.

Southwest's bid calls for ATA creditors to name a seven-member board in consultation with Southwest. The board would also appoint executives and, in the process, consult with Southwest on filling these positions: chairman, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer and chief restructuring officer or co-restructuring officers.

"Because we're putting money in, we're interested in the management team," Kelly said.

Kelly said he would prefer that ATA founder and Chairman J. George Mikelsons remain as chairman.

Southwest, which now operates 19 Midway gates, also would be interested in ATA's strategic direction in Chicago.

The Dallas airline's proposal would funnel passengers to ATA in Chicago under the code-sharing arrangement, which Kelly said could generate up to $25 million a year in new revenue for ATA.

It's a new direction for Southwest because ATA could also sell tickets to Southwest passengers in cities such as Boston and Dallas.

ATA flies to those two cities now from Midway, but Southwest does not.

Separately, Southwest rescinded a bid provision that called for a 15 percent to 20 percent reduction in labor costs at ATA.

Officials of the Air Line Pilots Association, which represents ATA's 1,100 pilots, have given tentative support to the Southwest bid
 
atldc9 said:
ATA's decision must still be accepted by ATA creditors, the city of Chicago and U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Basil Lorch III.
Well we know that ATA creditors are backing the deal. I wouldn't assume this means the ATSB until we get an official statement. That also includes the DOJ. I'm sure Daley will wait until Lorch has given his blessing before we hear what Chicago has to say.

Remember, nothing gets done till Daley gives his blessing. Daley is a democrat, is he not? The last thing he wants is some bureaucrat from the Republican Administration trying to arm twist him into siding with Southwest. The next few announcements will be interesting.
 
LOWERIDIOT,

If you really think a judge's decision will be based upon his political party, than you are dumber than your avatar looks. But if it makes you feel any better, Herb and Colleen are flaming Democrats. So what will that do to your formula?
 
SWA = bills will be paid.

I personally think once all debt is paid, SWA will then purchase the rest of the company. Leaving George his 757s and L1011s for his charter business.
 
lowecur,

Give it a rest, SWA won the battle, did you really expect for AirTran to win this fight? Cash is King.

I was wrong about AWA but I knew AirTran couldn't win if it was just a knife fight between the two.

I am thankful that AirTran did fight because if they didn't, SWA would have offered even less than AirTran initially did. This is just business.

Obviously, I'm thrilled that this deal went through. Nothing personal against anyone, I'd be proud to work with any of the AirTran or SWA crews.

SWA please be gentle, and will you still LUV us in the morning.

See ya'll in the Jumpseat!
 
Last edited:
FalconIdiot said:
LOWECUR,

If you really think a judge's decision will be based upon his political party, where did I say Judges decision? Can you read, you lummox? than you are dumber than your avatar looks. But if it makes you feel any better, Herb and Colleen are flaming Democrats. What about Gary? So what will that do to your formula?
Well just have to wait and see.;)
 
atafan said:
lowecur,

Give it a rest, SWA won the battle, did you really expect for AirTran to win this fight. Cash is King. Temporarily. This is a band-aid solution for ATA, and SWA will flush you down the toilet when they are done using you. Although it will buy you time to look around.

See ya'll in the Jumpseat!
Okay!:)
 
It doesnt mention anything about planes or pilots. Just Gates and the 27% stake of ATA. What affect would this have on the pilot groups?
 
As an ATA person, not really sure where things will go from here. SWA owning 27% says something. If the creditors can get a new management team inserted the possibilities are endless. Turn key code share to international destinations.

One thing I can say, ATA has survived over the years by the dedicated,-- carrying the place on there back working stiffs---. Put a management team in place that knows how to run an airline(like SWA) or even SWA providing direction gives the employees here something to work for and bite down on, then you would create an unstoppable entity.
 
Best guess.

ATA will probably still furlough and drop to around 52 aircraft. ATA still needs to get out of CH11. ATA will still operate on it's own with management team support from SWA. Latest guess, around 140 but not more tan 300 pilots will be furloughed, hopefully not for long. ATA doesn't currently have a business plan. - Go Figure.

If SWA is really interested in making this code share agreement work, that's the real question in my mind, ATA would re-tool the airline to take advantage this extremely valuable relationship.

There could be some real exciting possiblities. Imagine buying a SWA ticket from Omaha to Europe, South America, Mexico and more. I could see SWA sculpting their international arm with little investment and exposure. This could be a Win-Win for both groups.

SWA and ATA pilots should immediately establish a line of communication. A trusting relationship should be developed with the goal of a stronger larger SWA, that includes ATA pilots as part of that solution.

again, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
I honestly believe that this couldn't have turned out any better for ATA and SWA. Of course for the ATA group, the AWA deal would have been best for completely securing jobs; however, I can't believe that in these economic times AWA and ATA combining would have saved many jobs in the long term. This allows ATA to continue operating as itself, while giving SWA the opportunity to code-share to international destinations and Hawaii. If ATA goes through with it's international flying in '06, this means a Southwest passenger could go from DAL to Cologne, Germany with maybe 3 stops. Dangerous to the majors whose lifesource is international flying.

A very interesting turn of events. It will be quite a ride in the next few years watching this one play out for both airlines.
 
AirTran throws in the towel:

AirTran Airways: Back on Original Expansion Path
Thursday December 16, 9:49 am ET


ORLANDO, Fla., Dec. 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- AirTran Airways, a subsidiary of AirTran Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AAI - News), today said that while it was disappointed its bid for ATA Airlines' Chicago Midway gates was not successful, the airline will continue the expansion plan in place before the ATA opportunity arose.
"We saw Midway Airport expansion as a good opportunity, but we were not going to overpay for those assets. We congratulate the parties on the conclusion of the auction," said Joe Leonard, chairman and chief executive officer of AirTran Airways. "Before this opportunity came along, the airline had a successful growth blueprint in place, and we will continue to move forward with that plan."

AirTran Airways is one of the largest low-fare airlines operating America's youngest all-Boeing fleet, and, in the next year, the airline will take delivery of 19 new Boeing aircraft. In 2004, AirTran Airways will mark two major milestones -- it will surpass $1 billion in revenue for the first time and will post its sixth consecutive year of profitability.

Editor's note: Statements regarding the Company's operational and financial success, business model, expectation about future success, improved operational performance and our ability to maintain or improve our low costs are forward-looking statements and are not historical facts. Instead, they are estimates or projections involving numerous risks or uncertainties, including but not limited to, consumer demand and acceptance of services offered by the Company, the Company's ability to maintain current cost levels, fare levels and actions by competitors, regulatory matters and general economic conditions. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in the Company's SEC filings, including but not limited to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company disclaims any obligation or duty to update or correct any of its forward-looking statements.

Media Contact:
Tad Hutcheson
678.254.7442
[email protected]

Judy Graham-Weaver
678.254.7448
[email protected]
 
Falcon Jet 1 said:
If you really think a judge's decision will be based upon his political party, than you are dumber than your avatar looks.
Hmmm. Falcon, if you don't think judges lean one way or another, one might suggest not that you are "dumb", but perhaps a bit naive.
 
Doesn't this Southwest deal seem a bit anti-trust-ish to anyone?
 
lowecur said:
Well we know that ATA creditors are backing the deal. I wouldn't assume this means the ATSB until we get an official statement. That also includes the DOJ. I'm sure Daley will wait until Lorch has given his blessing before we hear what Chicago has to say.

Remember, nothing gets done till Daley gives his blessing. Daley is a democrat, is he not? The last thing he wants is some bureaucrat from the Republican Administration trying to arm twist him into siding with Southwest. The next few announcements will be interesting.

The last thing he wants is to put a lot of ATA Chicago employees out of work. Bad move politically.
 
"CAPTAIN" Seth. When pilots feel the need to put "Capt" in front of their name it usally means one of two things.

1. They are **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**ty pilots who feel better by putting "Capt" in front of their name.

2. They have small tools.

I suspect both :)


P.S. Do you always feel the need to tell chicks that your a "PILOT"? Yeah, I thought so......
 

Latest resources

Back
Top