Ha Ha this is like herding cats. Even a simpleton like yourself should be able to comprehend it. You got hired by Southwest, conditionally. The condition was that you obtain a type on a B737, as you were not qualified. You paid for your training on the 737 to obtain the said job. I'm not saying I disagree, hell I would have done it too. You recouped all your monies right away, I get it. For you not to see the irony of you calling someone else out on the PFT issue is disingenuous at best, and it makes you look rather vapid.
Using the same rational that SWA-bashers provide in their insults, everybody in this industry has also "paid for training."
All you guys here. Every...Single...Pilot.
The chief complaint (or rationalization, that is) in calling Southwest "PFT," is said to be that we "shouldn't have to have our own type rating, because the company should provide it," or "it's not required by the FAA for the job." Okay, fine, let's look at that...
When you apply at any major airline that you want to work for, you look at their minimums page, and ensure you have them met. You do what you need to do. Southwest just required higher standards for entry. And until just recently, every airline required more ratings than the FAA did. You only needed a commercial license to be a new-hire FO flying for a major-- no ATP, and no type rating required. However, you had to get whatever your prospective employer said was his minimums, in ratings, hours, and education. And damn near every one of them required you to buy your own ATP, on your own dime, when it
wasn't required by the FAA for the job you got hired for. So you guys all did the exact same thing.
Personally, I came out of the military, so I bought an ATP rating and a type rating in order to satisfy Southwest's requirements. If I wanted to work for USAir or Northwest, or whatever, I would have only had to have bought the ATP rating. So, tell me guys, seriously--what's the difference? The answer is,
not a damn thing. Neither the ATP nor the type rating was required by the FAA of a newhire, which is SWA-hater's chief argument. Why didn't SWA just give its pilots a type rating when they upgraded and actually needed it to be legal? Well, the same reason the other airlines didn't just give
you an ATP along with your type rating when
you upgraded and actually needed it. I'm guessing it was individual airlines' ideas for minimum competency and motivation.
So when all you guys say that Southwest is "PFT," you're really saying that you're PFT as well,... just not
quite as much. That's like a homophobe deriding someone for taking it in the a$$, and then when it's pointed out that he does the same thing, his response is, "well, -I- don't let him put it in as far." Yeah, that's a great argument.
Trust me, there's a world of difference between actually paying your employer for the right to fly his airplane for him, and your chosen airline requiring one more (not-legally-required) rating than the other airlines requirements for (not-legally-required) pilot ratings.
But I'm sure pointing out you other PFT-er's raging hypocrisy won't stop anyone here on FI. But hell, seriously, if that's the worst insult you can come up with for me as a Southwest pilot, then I must be doing alright.
Bubba