A lot of the jB pilots had binding enforceable contracts that included things like furlough protection, minimum block hours, minimum fleet count, merger protections etc. they saw those evaporate due to "force majeur" after 9/11 or as a part of a bAAd merger. While they were furloughed age 65 was instituted, delaying their recall. All of this while an armada of RJs darkened the skies and narrow body airliners (formerly mainline) were parked in the desert - the result of scope being sold. ALPA reps held meetings at expensive golf resorts far from any airport... They were on flight pay loss so long that some grew beards. They can't be blamed for being apprehensive. Doesn't mean they are right or wrong - just means you should try to understand the genesis of their vote.
But what does this have to do with anything? Do the JB pilots want a binding legal contract that may have holes and issues or no protections at all like they currently have?
That's the question. This shouldn't be a referendum on ALPA. It's them or nothing.