weasel_lips
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2006
- Posts
- 474
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The opinion of the APA is...like your fake skab union...IRRELEVANT.
Now its your position that the APA is IRRELEVANT... and are irrelevant because they are like a fake skab union.
You are totally unglued.
I hope that AOL leaders are of your opinion.
Donate early and often.... cactuspilot.com.... DO IT NOW!!
Donate early and often.... cactuspilot.com.... DO IT NOW!!
You have no understanding of the process you're being forced into.
The West committee is completely autonomous as the APA actually know how to be a union and to fulfill it's DFR unlike you idiots. The APA has no say over what the West Committee presents to the arbitration panel so yes, as far as the APA is concerned, their opinion of the Nic is completely irrelevant as it relates to the West position.Yeah, I don't understand why you guys think APA is an irrelevant, fake skab union. I have no understanding of that. You guys are unglued.![]()
The APA has no say over what the West Committee presents to the arbitration panel...
Absolutely true. Because the only two parties are the APA and USAPA. There is NO West committee and there will be nothing a so called West committee will be involved in to present anything to anybody. Certainly not an arbitration panel.
I'm sure it's all spelled out in the protocol agreement right? Wait....where IS the protocol agreement?
The NMB is about to wipe your fake union off the map as designed by Silver. You're not going to like what happens after that...care to guess WHY there isn't now, or ever going to be a protocol agreement?
Strange how you beat your chest about there being not West committee when both the APA and the Company want one. They're both playing USAPA for the idiots you are.
RLA? Did you mean McCaskill-Bond? Assuming you did, the key is the "s" when it say it applies to employee groups. So it isn't prohibited.In the case of a West committee, I don't think the RLA allows for anyone other than the legal CBA (USAPA) to bargain for the US Airways pilots.
You're confused about several things. First, the NMB will rule and USAPA will no longer exist, possibly as soon as April.It seems even Judge Silver agreed with that part of the law. I think the only way the West could possibly get "a seat at the table" is if USAPA, APA and the company all agree to it. Otherwise, the law must be followed, and that means USAPA is our agent for the SLI.
. Let's see how things transpire this week.