Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

The Costa Citationair

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
X-rated said:
Praetorian, I've made an extra effort not to pick on you lately, but this response is beneath you. You can't make that big of a deal about the proper use of "there, their, and they're right after you make the same mistake and not expect to be called on it. Even OHGOON says it's fair.

OHGOON obviously writes well. I think he can handle it.
Click to expand...

Yea me too because, unlike gret, I don't think you do the message board thing for a living.

But don't presume to know what is "beneath" me. You really have know idea.

So breath easy. My only real point was that, all grammatical rhetoric aside, the wife beater guy is not worth your time, or the damage you do to your credibility by seemingly defending him.

But if that's hard for you, by all means, bring it on. I can also "handle it".
 
I didn't defend him, mention him, or comment one way or another. Get a grip. My comment was one sentence on the proper use of word there. I mean their... err they're. You really are quite paranoid aren't you?
 
Praetorian said:
Yea me too because, unlike gret, I don't think you do the message board thing for a living.

But don't presume to know what is "beneath" me. You really have know idea.

So breath easy. My only real point was that, all grammatical rhetoric aside, the wife beater guy is not worth your time, or the damage you do to your credibility by seemingly defending him.

But if that's hard for you, by all means, bring it on. I can also "handle it".
Click to expand...

I'm sitting here minding own business watching the WSOP on ESPN and all of sudden I see my handle flash by...what the heck did I do?

I'm sensitive and won't be able to sleep well this evening because of this lame attempt to bait me into a discussion.
 
OHGOON said:
or to the damage that has... vs "to damage the has..." Karma is a bitch as X-Rated pointed out to me earlier...:)
Click to expand...

Good evening OHGOON...not sure if karma had anything to do with it...was rewriting the final sentence when my best friend barked because he needed to do his business outside and I hit reply without proofreading.

Weak excuse I know...but it is true...normally make these types of errors when I've had a couple of gin and tonics.
 
Not to be petty and stoop to your level, but what the heck-

"Unbridled"...?....Geez...I thought you represented the other end of the horse. :)​

Couldn't help myself and I do apologize....;)
 
Ok then, back to the subject at hand.

Are the pilots of CA better off without representation when it comes time to merge seniority lists or even retaining any kind of job when bought?

Sal and a few others have made a lot of noise without providing even a shred of what could be called a cogent argument. Instead they have relied upon vague promises and some people's preference for ideology over reason.

What's missing is any kind of reasonable rationale for giving up what we have already obtained for ourselves by winning the original NMB vote in the Summer of 2011.

Bottom line, why should we believe the anti-union arguments now when being unionized is even more in our interest then ever.
 
I heard today the flight options deal went through. Details to come out next week.
 
XTW said:
Word on the street is the only pilots considered for any type of retention and integration are going to be MIGS. Just sayin'.:p


X
Click to expand...

Also heard it would be operated as a separate company. Guess that shoots a hole in that street rumor.
 
XTW said:
Word on the street is the only pilots considered for any type of retention and integration are going to be MIGS. Just sayin'.:p


X
Click to expand...

I know you're kidding right? That would be illegal under the Duty of Fair Representation rules. No unfortunately, the free loaders will continue to be protected on the backs of everyone else. :angryfire

Regardless, let's hope this latest rumor is true. Cessna/Textron's willful neglect and incompetence is strangling this place. It would be a nice change to once again have a management with a vested interest in making CA successful, rather than the sclerotic bunch of undertakers we now enjoy . Hopefully, competence will be somewhat part of the package too, would be sort of a bonus... :D Fingers crossed!
 
Humphreybogart said:
It's not MY mec...I voted NO and stand with my vote. BTW, Googone, or whatever your name is...you're an IDIOT.
Click to expand...


Looks like CA's anal ventriloquist is back from self imposed hiatus. How we've all missed your tortured wind-breaking...

You can't stand with, by, or anywhere near your vote for that matter because you weren't allowed one. Spreading management FUD is all you have contributed.

Coming from someone with such a stellar record of superior moral and intellectual standards, your personal opinion of me is keeping me up at nights...
 
Last edited:
Be careful, When he has nothing factual to say. He'll just start picking on your spelling or the structure of your sentences. I do have two questions. Why did NJ get rid of the Teamsters? Why is FO Pay one of the lowest in the industry? Thank you Teamsters, Not!!!!
 
FRACTRASH said:
Be careful, When he has nothing factual to say. He'll just start picking on your spelling or the structure of your sentences. I do have two questions. Why did NJ get rid of the Teamsters? Why is FO Pay one of the lowest in the industry? Thank you Teamsters, Not!!!!
Click to expand...

Take down the avitar picture of you beating your wife/girlfriend, or shut the f**k up.
 
Man...are you OK? You seem on edge.

Its not like you to misspell avatar (avitar) and embarrassing (embarising on another thread).
 
gret said:
Man...are you OK? You seem on edge.

Its not like you to misspell avatar (avitar) and embarrassing (embarising on another thread).
Click to expand...

Yes it's horrible. I'm mortified. After all, I know that in your shallow little world (the world of professional union busting) a man's worth is dictated by his ability to spell, even while posting via cell phone.

The rest of us don't give a f**k what you think. You've been exposed.
 
That's all you have? I love the fact my Avatar bothers you people so bad. If you look closely, it's my sister and me drinking some of that, there white lightning Grandpa made. Now, answer my question. Why did NJ throw the Teamsters out?
 

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top Bottom