Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You refer to the Process Agreement which said this:Really Howard ?
Go back and read the process agreement. Its in writing. Leave your hindsight in the closet next to your rubber ball gag. Pretend that you believe it was written in good faith. Then compare it to what happened.
They treat me well. They have bent over backwards to help me in my time of need. They pay me well and I like my schedule and benefits. But, if our new contract contained any "the company will make its best effort" type of language I would vote no in a heartbeat. It's an airline, out to make a profit, I sip the kool-aid not gulp it.More proof that the "golden rule" is nothing but a sham at SWA.
PCL,
Explain to me how you envision "the golden rule" playing out through an SLI process.
OK, Mr. ALPA EVP know it all, when do you think Richard Anderson told Gary Kelly he would take the B717s off SWA's hands?Why don't you ask Russ M. about that, since he was the senior manager attending road shows when we were told that the 717s would be staying until lease expiration.
PCL,
Explain to me how you envision "the golden rule" playing out through an SLI process.
Easy, relitive senority .
So basically just take how many years you where at AT and double it. That would be your new senority at SWA.
I left out double double your pay ( in reality it would triple )
.
I don't expect you to see it my way, but every time you trot out that hogwash about us "doubling our pay", I'm obligated to set you straight.
Ty
Ty,
Are you under the impression that an arbitrator is going to change the seniority list?
For a flight attendant, maybe.
For a current AirTran Captain, it's basically a $10K/yr loss until re-upgrade, and then a $30K raise from where you would be at AAI in that same year (2019).
Subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Seniority Integration Agreement between Southwest, AirTran, SWAPA and ALPA, the Dispute Resolution Committee was created to resolve certain disputes arising from the interpretation or application of the September 2011 Seniority Integration Agreement. The committee functions within the boundaries of the Dispute Resolution Agreement and provides claimants access to binding arbitration. Importantly, an arbitrator's scope is limited solely to interpreting the agreement. The arbitrator cannot add to, remove from or otherwise modify the agreement, and the accompanying seniority list cannot be altered.I can't speak for TW. But I am sure some do. Anything is possible
More proof that the "golden rule" is nothing but a sham at SWA.
Well, we've pretty much covered how pilots from each seniority list view it; eventually, we'll see how a neutral observer views it.
That's probably what should have been done from the start.