i fly boxes
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2006
- Posts
- 848
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Place your bets, last minute TA? Judge in favor of the company or the union?
I predict the deadline will get extended and we will know nothing Thursday
If I Interpret that letter correctly, lets say we go down to 41 900s In a worst case scenario, does that mean we would only have Mesaba captains left and every single pinnacle captain would be downgraded?
If I Interpret that letter correctly, lets say we go down to 41 900s In a worst case scenario, does that mean we would only have Mesaba captains left and every single pinnacle captain would be downgraded?
If I Interpret that letter correctly, lets say we go down to 41 900s In a worst case scenario, does that mean we would only have Mesaba captains left and every single pinnacle captain would be downgraded?
ALPO will fold like a cheap suit Thursday on the steps of the courthouse. It is what the XJ leadership does best.
Hunta is just tacking to the prevailing wind, all 9E pilot overboard to save the XJ staffing model.
He was asked to step down and he didn't. What an atrocity. He serves you, the pilot group, not the other way around. All those hotel bills and filet mignons totaling $12,000 total have been expensed to the union so they come out of your dues. I'm really surprised no one cares.
I'm surprised the pilot group let him get away without demanding getting clarification from Bloch. These people get bought off trips from YOUR DUES MONEY! Demand accountability!!! What have they been doing this time when their trips are removed with pay and thrown on a reserve? Where are the answers to those 2 questions asked by the Planning of Manpower? Recall these people and get someone who will actually fight and get answers from Bloch, and give answers to the planner of manpower at 9E. Hunta has failed you. He failed the day his group proposed a Colgan staple, and didn't even have the guts to tell the 9E pilot group what they proposed, until the Colgan committee leaked it. Classic!
He was asked to step down and he didn't. What an atrocity. He serves you, the pilot group, not the other way around. All those hotel bills and filet mignons totaling $12,000 total have been expensed to the union so they come out of your dues. I'm really surprised no one cares.
I'm surprised the pilot group let him get away without demanding getting clarification from Bloch. These people get bought off trips from YOUR DUES MONEY! Demand accountability!!! What have they been doing this time when their trips are removed with pay and thrown on a reserve? Where are the answers to those 2 questions asked by the Planning of Manpower? Recall these people and get someone who will actually fight and get answers from Bloch, and give answers to the planner of manpower at 9E. Hunta has failed you. He failed the day his group proposed a Colgan staple, and didn't even have the guts to tell the 9E pilot group what they proposed, until the Colgan committee leaked it. Classic!
Excellent question. Something that should have been asked and answered a long time ago. Too busy eating steaks on union dime. Show me da money dolla dolla bling bling
As I stated 2 months ago: New HQ will end up at the old NATCO...Delta will purchase 9E....9E will operate the 717's.
How are you people okay with all this?! ESPECIALLY you ATL folks. You should be outraged at the complete lack of motivation of the 9E merger committee, their sheer incompetence, and the fact that they did not seek any clarification from Bloch and get an answer back. The list came out last Summer. It's been over one year. You ATL people are about to be seriously affected by the upcoming displacement. In the Bloch award, he used the Saab reduction in his quotas but did NOT for the jets because no jets were being parked. Now the Mesaba and Colgan committees will say that because 9E is losing its -900s, they do not have the protected 95 Captain seats. Where's your 9E committee's answer to this? Why did they not get an answer from Bloch in nearly 18 months? Sheer incompetence! ATL pilots, your only hope is that the 95 protected Captain seats is kept as a ratio (like 362:95, Mesaba to Pinnacle), because your worst case scenario right now is losing all 95 protected Captain seats on the -900. The VP of Crew Manning has asked 2 very basic questions, and they are time critical. The 9E committee "forgot" all about that letter, is is a clear failure to represent. And to add insult to injury he refuses to step down when asked. The life of being bought off trips and doing whatever you want on those paid union days with ZERO accountability is just too easy a life. The all expense paid trips to Outback Steakhouse to have the finest steak, they wouldn't give that up. For what? Actually working and trying to get an answer from Bloch? Screw that. "Waiter, can I get another beer with this filet mignon?"
Yeah right. The list came out last summer 2011. It's now Nov 2012, a year and a half later and the 9E committee still didn't get any answers or clarifications from Bloch. They did, however, manage to rack up $12,000 in expenses in lodging and meals, whereas the Mesaba and Colgan committees only had $5,000-$6000 each. They double-outspent than their counterparts at Mesaba and Colgan.Is it fair to say that they're working on a lot of things right now.
No. I just said, leave it alone. The Bloch award as of right now makes no adjustments for ANY jet leaving. So no matter what happens, 541 Captains on the CRJ-200 should be Pinnacle and 100 should be Mesaba. On the CRJ-900, same thing, quota of 372 Mesaba and 95 Pinnacle. This should be the case REGARDLESS of which jet is parked, the ratios (541:100 for the CRJ-200 and 372:95 for the CRJ-900) need to be maintained. This is because the Bloch award did NOT account for any jet leaving. To say anything otherwise is directly contradicting the Bloch award.And if the block award is changed for one aircraft leaving (9E 900's) shouldn't the whole award be revised? All the props are gone also
Yeah right. The list came out last summer 2011. It's now Nov 2012, a year and a half later and the 9E committee still didn't get any answers or clarifications from Bloch. They did, however, manage to rack up $12,000 in expenses in lodging and meals, whereas the Mesaba and Colgan committees only had $5,000-$6000 each. They double-outspent than their counterparts at Mesaba and Colgan.
No. I just said, leave it alone. The Bloch award as of right now makes no adjustments for ANY jet leaving. So no matter what happens, 541 Captains on the CRJ-200 should be Pinnacle and 100 should be Mesaba. On the CRJ-900, same thing, quota of 372 Mesaba and 95 Pinnacle. This should be the case REGARDLESS of which jet is parked, the ratios (541:100 for the CRJ-200 and 372:95 for the CRJ-900) need to be maintained. This is because the Bloch award did NOT account for any jet leaving. To say anything otherwise is directly contradicting the Bloch award.
Now one could argue that it was known the Mesaba Saabs were leaving, and Bloch issued his award with a declining protection of Captain seats as the Saabs left. True. But the same was not done for jets, so no amount of conjecture or "well, he must have also meant it for the jets" should change that.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. As of right now, regardless of what happens, Bloch award allows 541 protected Pinnacle Captains on the CRJ-200 and 95 protected Captains on the CRJ-900. Of course, the Mesaba and Colgan committees will disagree and in the end, the 9E committee will yet again be nowhere to be seen, and the 9E pilot group will lose out again and get screwed once more.
That right there is the Mesaba fantasy. You couldn't be more wrong. Read the award again, NOWHERE does it mention anything about jet fleet reductions. Bloch did not account or direct for jet fleet reductions. Here is what he said:Flyer. Worry about your company and family. Stop fueling the fire here. Get your numbers right too. The 900's in ATL are specifically tied to the 95 positions for 9e. Same as Bloch had to the Saab fleets at MESABA. When they draw down, so do the slot numbers.
It doesn't matter about the bases or who bought what CRJ-200s. It has to be the ratios, as his awards states. To the T. 541 Captains must be Pinnacle, 100 must be Mesaba. In the event that it can't be, then a ratio of 541:100 must be used until reaching a minimum of 541 and 100 respectively.When the 200 fleet is drawn down as per the delta pilot contract I am sure since the 200's are fully merged it will be a ratio even though the newest of the 200's which will most likely be the only ones remaining on property were. Pre merger MESABA. At that time there will be a lot more to worry about than just 95 positions. 1000 positions will be at risk unless we get the 70 new planes from the delta pilot contract.
Delta won't be buying Pinnacle, and I definitely don't see a flow coming, considering how quickly they (mgt and DALPA) wanted to end the Mesaba and Compass flows.If we are bought by delta- I will plan on the worst case scenario as the last time that happened I lost a great company (MESABA), lost seniority, lost pass benefits, got worse work rules, my flow, a possible displacement, downgrade, and I can only imagine what could be worse- oh yeah- a new flow? Awesome before I had 200 in front of me and now I would have a 1000. Just peachy.