Well, seeing as I'm not identifying him by screen name and he was the MEC Vice Chair, which is a matter of public record, I'm talking about Todd Ortscheid.
SWA/FO, not going to get into a debate over it (I'm not meaning you, I'm meaning anyone else who might want to debate the issue on this forum - not going to happen). I'm friends with both him and with several MEC reps and I'm not getting in the middle of it. It's union politics, and this kind of thing is why I didn't run for MCO FO rep.
I should mention that he had already submitted his resignation last week, and there were no allegations of any "wrong doing", although the MEC has sent out a letter that I'm not altogether certain is 100% accurate and may be overstating the issue. It seems to be more of a fundamental difference of opinion on how things should work during the SLI. They didn't want to accept his resignation with the timeline where he stayed in office for a couple months training his replacement (which is standard ALPA practice), so they recalled him effective immediately.
The important thing is that the union will continue to function without any issues because of the way it's structured, the MC is unaffected by it COMPLETELY, and it's not going to affect the SLI in any appreciable way. What WILL be affected is the daily operations of our union - he did a LOT of work in and out of that office. It will take some time to get volunteers up to speed and hopefully not too much will fall by the wayside while that happens since 99.9% of our efforts are focused on the SLI. It's never a good thing to suddenly have a void in an important office.
Wave, he was recalled by the MEC. In an ALPA structure, the pilots elect status representatives, a CA and an FO for each domicile. In our structure, since ATL is so big, we have two CA and two FO reps for ATL. That means we have 8 voting "reps" (4 CA's, 4 FO's) and 2 non-voting reps (the Sec/Treas in MCO and MKE). Together these 10 pilots comprise the "MEC".
They are line pilots so can't run the union on a daily basis, so they elect an MEC Chairman (Linden Hilman) and MEC Vice-Chairman (Todd Ortscheid) to run the daily activities of the union office, appoint committee chairman, interact with ALPA Legal, Company management, etc. The idea is that the people who DIRECT the union (the MEC status reps) are active line pilots who have their ears to the ground and always know what's going on out on the line. They then direct the MEC Chair and Vice Chair on broad goals and policies, that Chair and Vice Chair carry it out.
So the pilots didn't elect TO, nor did they remove him. The status reps (MEC) did that.
As far as your fears about ALPA involvement... I know where your coming from, really I do, but there's really no reason for fear here. ALPA National doesn't talk to us. They talk to our MC and they talk to our status reps and MEC Chair and Vice-Chair. We get our updates from the MEC and NOTHING is being said to us except that we will participate in the process as agreed and in good faith, hoping to come up with a mutually-agreed SLI. That's it.
The only people saying anything more than that are line pilots on our internal message board, and even that has almost disappeared since our MEC asked us (politely) to STHU.
No one's riling anyone up on our side of the table. Actually, our pilots are worried that your union officials are riling YOUR pilots up to accept nothing less than a Swingling Solution. Funny how we're both worried about the same thing on the opposite side of the table.
