Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran Strike Vote...98 percent say YES!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Are you guys going to strike or not?
Don't know... it's certainly a "wrinkle" in the game plan.

We meet with the company for negotiations again with the NMB likely a week from Monday or Tuesday (when we WERE, more than likely, going to request to be released to strike). The company is NOW saying, in the interest of having a stable company to merge, that they would like to "bridge the divide" and finish the contract.

Since the only things remaining are financial, it's completely up to the company. I'm sure our MEC is getting feedback from a few people saying to "give a little", but not only is the mainline sentiment to get something we can live with "just in case" this doesn't work out, but further, the problem is they really can't suddenly cave on our requirements; the Wilson Polling data was very specific on what the minimum signable contract levels are.

We're also dealing with a Lame Duck management team. Per the T&C's of the acquisition paperwork, unless required by the NMB, the company may not sign any material change to our CBA without the express approval of the SWA BoD or Gary Kelly. Which means... interestingly enough... Southwest now controls our contract negotiations, albeit from behind the scenes.

So what remains to be seen next week is whether our management has been given a directive to "get it done", or whether the directive is "stall if you can" and gamble we won't get militant. Personally, I wouldn't choose Option B, simply because it would become very obvious VERY quickly to our pilots just exactly WHERE those marching orders are coming from...

For that reason alone, I'm actually cautiously optimistic about next week's negotiating session. There are literally BILLIONS of dollars at stake for what equates to very little over the course of the next year to 18 months as we transition into the Southwest contract structure and pay rates. There's no REASONABLE excuse not to give us a fair contract to live under for the year or two it will take to get this all done.

Will we strike if NOT given a reasonable contract? Not before DOCC. After that,,, I make no promises.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting that Kelly controls the negotiations. I had a feeling about this. Thanks for the info. BIG PIECE OF THE PUZZLE. I would not be suprised if Kelly gave you a good raise. I guess he already did.;):D
 
Last edited:
Very interesting that Kelly controls the negotiations. I had a feeling about this. Thanks for the info. BIG PIECE OF THE PUZZLE. I would not be suprised if Kelly gave you a good raise. I guess he already did.;):D

Believe it when you're cashing the check, my friend. ;)

Like I said, "cautiously optimistic". Until then, continuing to hope for the best, but plan for the worst, like the rest of us. Aviation, she is a fickle task master. You never know what she's gonna throw at you.
 
There are literally BILLIONS of dollars at stake for what equates to very little over the course of the next year to 18 months as we transition into the Southwest contract structure and pay rates

Question...........

Is a retro/ signing bonus on the table? If so, will ALPA be looking to get their "fair share"? I haven't heard much on this subject. I do however remember the uproar at a previous employer when the signing bonus pot was set for the planned distribution.

I bet ALPA is looking to make sure they cash in on every penny they can get their nappy lil hands on.

Dick
 
Funny, Lear, I didn't read that clause the same as you . . . . It looked to me like it said that they would make no changes, except those required by good faith negotiations under the RLA, or something to that effect. I will have to reread that after a little more coffee.
 
I dont have time to read through all the threads but my recommendation to the AirTran guys is do your homework. Southwest is a stand up company and will treat you right in time. Re-Read, it takes time to work stuff out. Work with them and dont expect instant rewards/pay increases! Research how Southwest handled Muse Air and TranStar Merger/Acquisition or lack there of. If you put your pride in front of common sense you may not like the outcome. At the time Herb was running the show. He was a man of his word. I assume Gary is a clone of Herbs.
 
Lear
I'll be an evil person here and say I believe Kelly will do it because he thinks it will bring your wages up to SWA wages. From there the SLI will be a lot easier since your wages would be comparable. Wouldn't even be shocked if the SWA Union President knew this.

Best of luck to everyone!
 
K mart,

Good point, but it won't happen. Airtran is making money. From a biz stand point why would they do that. Until the pilots integrate to our network and route structure then the cost will be equal, to give a pay bump per our contract.
 
Funny, Lear, I didn't read that clause the same as you . . . . It looked to me like it said that they would make no changes, except those required by good faith negotiations under the RLA, or something to that effect. I will have to reread that after a little more coffee.
I read that to mean that they are allowed to continue to meet with us as directed by the NMB and to follow NMB instructions, but the NMB can't REQUIRE the company come to an agreement.

So, since good-faith negotiations don't REQUIRE the company to come to an agreement, and the company can't make any changes otherwise, it would basically fall into Gary Kelly's lap to approve any CBA.

This is pretty standard stuff when it comes to the business world in general, as I'm sure you're familiar with. A company buys another company and ties that company up from entering into any new contracts until the DOCC. Otherwise you'd have a small trucking company contracting to their brother-in-law to supply all their gas at full retail prices for a 10-year contract right after the paperwork was signed and there'd be nothing the purchasing company could do about it.

Lear
I'll be an evil person here and say I believe Kelly will do it because he thinks it will bring your wages up to SWA wages. From there the SLI will be a lot easier since your wages would be comparable. Wouldn't even be shocked if the SWA Union President knew this.

Best of luck to everyone!
I don't know if they'll agree to bring us up to SWA wages, since we weren't even asking for those (closer to ALA/HAL + 2%), but I wouldn't be a BIT surprised if the company came back with a fairly reasonable offer.

Time will tell. We meet with the company up at the NMB in 2 weeks and we'll know a lot more after that 2 or 3 day session... Until then, not worrying about it, as there's nothing I can do about it, just sitting back and enjoying life. :)
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top