propsarebest
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2004
- Posts
- 1,559
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure what is so groundbreaking about this partnership (see article title)... !
Heck, even the 135's are flying with plenty of empty seats. Increasing capacity on an already thin route by more than 100% just doesn't seem like a sound idea. QUOTE]
When I flew Airtran back in September from STL to MKE both ways the flight was fully booked.
The difference here is that the commuter flying will be done "at risk" by Skywest. The former AWAC contract was a "fee per departure" contract. This is a sweet deal for AirTran, if the flying makes a lot a revenue, they get a piece, although a smaller piece than a "fee per departure" agreement. If the flying loses money Skywest has to take the loss and supplement the flying with revenue from other carrier contracts.
I fly for Skywest and I'm not impressed. This shows how desperate we are for flying. This flying is here today gone tomorow if Skywest doesn't make money.