Anonymous2
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
- Posts
- 146
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The difference here is that the commuter flying will be done "at risk" by Skywest. The former AWAC contract was a "fee per departure" contract. This is a sweet deal for AirTran, if the flying makes a lot a revenue, they get a piece, although a smaller piece than a "fee per departure" agreement. If the flying loses money Skywest has to take the loss and supplement the flying with revenue from other carrier contracts.
I fly for Skywest and I'm not impressed. This shows how desperate we are for flying. This flying is here today gone tomorow if Skywest doesn't make money.
These airplanes are also much cheaper than the AWAC planes circa 2002, also. As far as I'm concerned, this is a brilliant move by Skywest. If it works, expect more doors to open.
you hit the nail on the head here. Airtran is drooling at the opportunity to stick it to Republic any way they can. If they can do that with zero risk, then why not?
These airplanes are also much cheaper than the AWAC planes circa 2002, also. As far as I'm concerned, this is a brilliant move by Skywest. If it works, expect more doors to open.