Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta lands on M in the ATL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Must have been some regional pilots at the controls. We all know the Ones Who Wear Double Breasted Jackets could NEVER do anything like this.
 
Must have been some regional pilots at the controls. We all know the Ones Who Wear Double Breasted Jackets could NEVER do anything like this.

The "best of the best" never makes mistakes....Only inexperienced "commuter" pilots do things like this...
 
The "best of the best" never makes mistakes....Only inexperienced "commuter" pilots do things like this...

My God, you really have a complex.
 
The problem is they were probably HIRED from a regional which has sub-standard training and of the few unchoosen ones who managed to make it under the radar on the the Delta seniority list... when will they learn NOT to hire these 4000 hour wonders!?!?

</sarcasm>
 
Careful where you go throwing your rocks everybody.

Yeah yeah, it could happen to any of us, blah blah blah. I keep hearing, "Wait for the full story before you judge". Ok, well what is it? They landed on a taxiway!!! You know, that pavement that's next to the runway but not quite as wide, and with the different colored lights, and other airplanes taxi on? That's going to have to be one helluva story to justify that one.
 
That's going to have to be one helluva story to justify that one.
They had declared a medical emergency, hence the request/clearance to land on the runway closer to the terminal. The captain is authorized to deviate from any rule to the extent required to meet an emergency. Since apparently the FAA (ATC) agreed that moving over a few feet was in the best interests of saving precious seconds, I contend that they would also agree that moving over a few more feet would save even more seconds, and therefore the PIC is authorized to do so. So there you go. :D
 
The FAA said:
The FAA adds that to their knowledge, no aircraft has ever landed on a Hartsfield taxiway before.
I guess that ASA incident several years ago was "expunged from their records."
 
They had declared a medical emergency, hence the request/clearance to land on the runway closer to the terminal. The captain is authorized to deviate from any rule to the extent required to meet an emergency. Since apparently the FAA (ATC) agreed that moving over a few feet was in the best interests of saving precious seconds, I contend that they would also agree that moving over a few more feet would save even more seconds, and therefore the PIC is authorized to do so. So there you go. :D


He should have just landed in the hospital parking lot then.
 
Wonder if anyone has seen the tires marks on M yet??? I'm sure DL wants the city to go out there today and pressure wash them away ASAP. Speaking of ASAP does DL have this program?
 
What the hell do you rush for in a medical emergency. I would think that the other passengers are hoping to live also. Just because someone is dying doesn't mean do everything wrong.
 
Wonder if anyone has seen the tires marks on M yet??? I'm sure DL wants the city to go out there today and pressure wash them away ASAP. Speaking of ASAP does DL have this program?

These guys better hope so, I was under the impression they got rid of it 2 1/2 yrs ago, because mang was using the info also or they were conducting parrallel investigations.
 
No excuses. They were relieved of duty, pending investigation. It was a "MAJOR" error; plain and simple.
 
Like a bunch of kids jumping up and down pointing "HE DID IT TOO! I'M TELLING!!!"
 
Maybe the airplane WOULDN'T LET THEM LAND......it was an airbus ya know.... you betcha!


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
ASAP at DAL is gone due to multiple issues, but in particular a specific 757 CA who repeatedly had tail strikes and then ASAPed it.
 
ASAP at DAL is gone due to multiple issues, but in particular a specific 757 CA who repeatedly had tail strikes and then ASAPed it.


Wrong. ASAP is back as of about 6 months ago. FOQA is back as well.


As far as the NWA bus "overflying MSP" ...this is the only site to have it. Even airnerders.net hasn't gotten to it yet. It will be interesting to see what really happened. Something doesn't look right as they didnt come straight back in or join an arrival.
 
Wrong. ASAP is back as of about 6 months ago. FOQA is back as well.


As far as the NWA bus "overflying MSP" ...this is the only site to have it. Even airnerders.net hasn't gotten to it yet. It will be interesting to see what really happened. Something doesn't look right as they didnt come straight back in or join an arrival.

-Because they were "nite-nite."
 
As far as the NWA bus "overflying MSP" ...this is the only site to have it. Even airnerders.net hasn't gotten to it yet. It will be interesting to see what really happened. Something doesn't look right as they didnt come straight back in or join an arrival.


Looks to me like they joined the Gopher arrival to a downwind to rwy 35. It did only happen a few hours ago and only those who over heard it on the radio would know. I'm sure it will be big news in the next few days.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom