Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta Connection EMB175s

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FBN0223

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Posts
563
Anyone DL contract gurus out there that know any new info on the flying that we gave away?

A few review Qs:

1) Is Compass the only operator under DL that operates EMB175s?

2) Are there any plans in the works for more EMB175s to be operated by other DL contract carriers?

3) Current DL limit on 75 seat aircraft not flown but DL pilots but under the Delta brand?

Really too bad we gave this flying away. Have several friends on the DC-9(B)and others in higher positions who would wouldn't mind flying Captain on the EMB if the price was right.

Any accurate info is appreciated. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Have several friends on the DC-9(B)and others in higher positions who would wouldn't mind flying Captain on the EMB if the price was right.

Any accurate info is appreciated. Thanks

I thought the point of having contract carriers is because the price ISN'T right, or they would be mainline aircraft.
 
They did not. Basically web board rumor caught them with their pants down. Still limited per Section one of the Delta PWA.
 
Anyone DL contract gurus out there that know any new info on the flying that we gave away?

A few review Qs:

1) Is Compass the only operator under DL that operates EMB175s?

No
2) Are there any plans in the works for more EMB175s to be operated by other DL contract carriers?
CPS has a few more planes that need to be delivered.
3) Current DL limit on 75 seat aircraft not flown but DL pilots but under the Delta brand?
76 seat A/C. 153 for now up to a total of 255.
Really too bad we gave this flying away. Have several friends on the DC-9(B)and others in higher positions who would wouldn't mind flying Captain on the EMB if the price was right.

Any accurate info is appreciated. Thanks

I will post an excerpt from CA 09-01
 
Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. of the Joint Collective Bargaining Agreement (the PWA currently in effect) reads as follows:
40. “Permitted aircraft type” means: . . .
d. one of up to 120 jet aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“76-seat jets”). The number of 76-seat jets may be increased above 120 by three 76-seat jets for each aircraft above the number of aircraft in the baseline fleet operated by the Company (in service, undergoing maintenance and operational spares) as of CBAID. The baseline fleet number will be 440+N, in which N is the number of aircraft (in service, undergoing maintenance and operational spares but not including permitted aircraft types) added to the Company’s baseline fleet from NWA. The number and type of all aircraft in the Company’s fleet on CBAID will be provided to the Association. The number of 70-seat jets plus 76-seat jets permitted by Section 1 B. 40. may not exceed 255.
Exception: Up to the 36 EMB-175s that were operated and/or ordered by Northwest prior to CBAID may continue to be operated with up to a maximum gross takeoff weight of 89,000 pounds.
e. once the number of permitted 76-seat jets is established, it will not be reduced.
Exception one: If a pilot on the seniority list with an employment date prior to September 1, 2001 is placed on furlough, the Company will convert all 76-seat jets for operation as 70-seat jets.
Exception two: In the event the flow provisions of NWA LOA 2006-10 and LOA 2006-14 cease to be available, either at the feeder carrier affiliate referenced in such LOAs or at another carrier, the number of jet aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats specified in Section 1 B. 40. d. will revert to 85.
Management believes that Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. establish the maximum number of 76-seat jets based on the number of aircraft in the mainline fleet at any date prior to the date a 76-seat jet enters service (and after Letter of Agreement 51 took effect). Essentially, this interpretation would allow the Company to operate a number of 76 seat jets based on the number of mainline jets at the highest point since LOA 51 took effect. The Association’s position is that Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. establish the maximum number of 76-seat jets based on the number of aircraft in the mainline fleet on the actual date a 76-seat jet enters service and that the maximum number of such 76-seat jets is not determined by the number of aircraft in the mainline fleet at any previous time nor does it include future deliveries in the mainline fleet number.

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
Management’s interpretation of Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. would authorize the Company to currently operate up to 156 76-seat jets. The Association’s interpretation of Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. would authorize the Company to currently operate 127 76-seat jets (see Figure 1).
Typically, barring a negotiated settlement, grievances are eventually decided by binding arbitration before a neutral third party, often at a point well into the future. While the Association feels confident that our interpretation of Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. is correct, there always remain several elements of risk whenever an issue is decided through arbitration.
After a number of face-to-face meetings and careful consideration, the parties reached a Settlement Agreement which mitigates the litigation risks but more importantly confirms the Association’s interpretation of the PWA and provides real and meaningful additional furlough protection for hundreds of the most vulnerable pilots on our seniority list, very similar to protections already available to more senior pilots.
The Settlement Agreement provides that:

Figure 1

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT] •
The Company will agree to the Association’s interpretation of Section 1 B. 40. d. and e. but provides a one-time exception to this interpretation allowing the Company to operate up to 153* 76-seat jets so long as the Company does not furlough any pilot on the integrated system seniority list as of February 9, 2009, the date the agreement was signed. With agreement on the interpretation of Section 1 B. 40. d. and e, any further increase above 153 76-seat jets will require substantial mainline fleet growth. For example, for the Company to add a 154th 76-seat jet, the mainline would have to be comprised of 768 mainline jets. Today the mainline fleet consists of 753 aircraft.

If the Company does furlough any pilot on the Integrated System Seniority List, then the Company will physically remove six passenger seats from the number of 76-seat jets (in service, undergoing maintenance and operational spares) that exceeds the authorized number of 76-seat jets under the Association’s interpretation of Section 1 B. 40. d. and e.

While the Company will have 90 days from the first furlough to physically remove the seats, such seats will become immediately unusable for any purpose upon the furlough of the very first pilot on the list.

It’s important to understand that the agreement is a settlement over an issue of scope language interpretation and not an issue of “scope relief.” Scope language is intended to protect pilot jobs. This agreement enhances job protections for Delta pilots. There has been no change to the scope language in our contract, and this settlement will not increase the number of regional jet hulls; it simply codifies the number of seats that will be allowed in up to 26 of those aircraft. It allows up to a total of 156 seats throughout the system (26 aircraft x 6 seats per airplane = 156) in exchange for furlough protections for hundreds of Delta pilots and their families and definitive agreement on the contractual language moving forward. Further, this agreement does not increase the ceiling on the total number of 70-seat/76-seat jets permitted by Section 1 B. 40. That number remains at 255, and with 153 76-seat jets, the total of 70/76-seat jets will be 224 while the overall number of all regional jets has decreased substantially over the past year.
Though the Company’s position provides for a total of 156 76-seat aircraft, the agreement limits the number to 153 aircraft.
 
Shuttle America, part of Republic Holdings, operates 16 E-175s. These planes directly replaced the E-170s that Shuttle was operating for Delta. Those displaced E-170s found homes elsewhere, with the majority of the airframes now doing United flying. The Shuttle America E-175's flown for Delta carry 76 passengers in a two-class configuration, and have a MTOW of 85,517. This MTOW is less than that of the Compass E-175s, and is under the contractual cap imposed by the new Delta CBA. Shuttle America wanted to up the MTOW of their 16 aircraft to match the Compass aircraft, but an attentive Delta pilot(s) caught wind of the change before it could be executed.
 
That is what I wanted to know. I know that the Delta Pilots supposedly "caught" it but did they really comply. I have witnessed some underhanded dealings before and was curious if this was going to happen again.
 
All Compass aircraft have been modified to the AR version (89,000 lbs) but the weights aren't being used yet because the flight planning software experienced some sort of glitch. I expect implementation in the next few weeks. Shouldn't affect many flights in the current compass route system.
 
Shuttle will not be modified per the communication between DALPA and our management and Shuttle America's management.
 
CPS has all 36 planes. The last one showed up last December.

Compass also had I think somewhere in the neighborhood of 18 options.
In last weeks AVweek and Space Tech an article about Embraer mentions someone with 18 options had canceles all 18 of those. Not sure if this is Compass's former allotment or not. Just food for thought on more E175's at Delta C carriers.
 
Compass also had I think somewhere in the neighborhood of 18 options.
In last weeks AVweek and Space Tech an article about Embraer mentions someone with 18 options had canceles all 18 of those. Not sure if this is Compass's former allotment or not. Just food for thought on more E175's at Delta C carriers.

The options were for 36 further airframes, and were Northwest's. I believe that Delta Connection is at the cap for 76 seaters, and I've heard the numbers on the E190/195 were not as attractive as DAL would like (per Bill Lentsch, NW FLOPS VP). I'd imagine the options will not be exercised anytime soon.
 
No
CPS has a few more planes that need to be delivered.
76 seat A/C. 153 for now up to a total of 255.

So DL can place at least 153 76 seat jets on-line under the DL brand, flying DL routes by non-Delta pilots. Our ALPA dues at work.

Thanks ACL for all the info.
 
Last edited:
Thats exactly why we were in the stapling fight to bring CPZ on board. And our own union isnt for it. I am still dumbfounded by the convo with Lee.
 
Last edited:
It is part of the JPWA.

As listed in the Contract Awareness above, we need 768 mainline jets before the 154th 76 RJ is put in service in Delta colors.
Now of bigger note is this. There are about 223 70 and 76 seat jets flying around in the Delta colors today. The max cap on this size of jet is 255. In effect 32 more 70 or 76 seat jets can be bought and put into service currently. Now as mainline grows they can replace the 70 seaters with the 76 seat variants. (see above for the sliding scale)
Even though the 76 seat jet offers two class service, the ROI on trading in a 70 seat jet is hard to quantify. The aircraft makers would have to offer really good terms to make it cost advantageous for Delta to do this. Six seat, even premium seats is a lot to bite off for a new aircraft lease after these 32 are bought. (we would need 779 mainline jets on the property as DCI took delivery of the 255th 70/76seat jet if the remaining jets delivered were the 76 seat variant)
 
Thats exactly why we were in the stapling fight to bring CPZ on board. And our own union isnt for it. I am dumbfounded by the convo with Lee.

I agree.

We need to remember that we need to write our reps about our feeling and opinions about the Compass issue. This issue is not dead. Far from it.
It has been quiet lately so that we are all not dead tired of it come the next LEC and MEC meetings. Remain ever vigilant on this!
 
Thats exactly why we were in the stapling fight to bring CPZ on board. And our own union isnt for it. I am still dumbfounded by the convo with Lee.


Why would Delta want to staple RJ pilots to their list? The lists should be kept separate so it is clear what is mainline and what is regional.

Military pilots will not stand for starting off their career at a legacy by having to fly an RJ and be junior to hundreds of regional pilots when the military pilots were risking their lives for our country. They deserve to go straight to a legacy and start off in a mainline jet no smaller than a 737 or MD-80. Anything smaller, like the ERJ 170-190 is cleary an RJ and should be flown by the regionals.
 
Why would Delta want to staple RJ pilots to their list? The lists should be kept separate so it is clear what is mainline and what is regional.

Military pilots will not stand for starting off their career at a legacy by having to fly an RJ and be junior to hundreds of regional pilots when the military pilots were risking their lives for our country. They deserve to go straight to a legacy and start off in a mainline jet no smaller than a 737 or MD-80. Anything smaller, like the ERJ 170-190 is cleary an RJ and should be flown by the regionals.
\

Keep flaming away buddy!

I fly heavy metal and would be quite happy to see these jets on the mainline list.
 
Why would Delta want to staple RJ pilots to their list? The lists should be kept separate so it is clear what is mainline and what is regional.

Military pilots will not stand for starting off their career at a legacy by having to fly an RJ and be junior to hundreds of regional pilots when the military pilots were risking their lives for our country. They deserve to go straight to a legacy and start off in a mainline jet no smaller than a 737 or MD-80. Anything smaller, like the ERJ 170-190 is cleary an RJ and should be flown by the regionals.


Air Canada guys start at the E175 level, and used to have 50 seat CRJs. Virgin Blue has E175s in Australia. I think we should slowly dump the regional carriers with E175s and CR9s, and fly that stuff ourselves. If someone wants to fly Saabs or Dash's for us, then we can contract them. We have pay rates for 76 seat types (anything more than 76 seats has to be flown by us anyway)--like the CR9 and E175 I believe. But hey, your flames sure are funny. Keep it up, and try out at the Laugh Barn in Marrietta on Thursday nights.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Starting out as a new-hire on the EMB175, would be one heck of a lot nicer than the DC-9, IMHO. Hence my frustration with our ALPA leadership.

Continually chopping off the bottom half of our airline and allowing it to be outsourced, cannot be a formula for long term vitality. Eventually, the brand dies.
 
Last edited:
Starting out as a new-hire on the EMB175, would be one heck of a lot nicer than the DC-9, IMHO. Hence my frustration with our ALPA leadership.

Continually chopping off the bottom half of our airline and allowing it to be outsourced, cannot be a formula for long term vitality. Eventually, the brand dies.


Well grassroots efforts have proven successful before.........
 
Military pilots will not stand for starting off their career at a legacy by having to fly an RJ and be junior to hundreds of regional pilots when the military pilots were risking their lives for our country. They deserve to go straight to a legacy and start off in a mainline jet no smaller than a 737 or MD-80.

I don't usually bite at flame bait but... And I'm sure Military pilots who will not stand for this indignity can realize their rightful place in the civilian world selling insurance. I'm sure they can even get name plate for their desk that says Col. or "call me Sir" Something tells me DAL will not have any problem attracting qualified candidates willing to fly a E175 as the entry. I'm sure there will be many military pilots among them.
 
Air Canada guys start at the E175 level, and used to have 50 seat CRJs. Virgin Blue has E175s in Australia. I think we should slowly dump the regional carriers with E175s and CR9s, and fly that stuff ourselves. If someone wants to fly Saabs or Dash's for us, then we can contract them. We have pay rates for 76 seat types (anything more than 76 seats has to be flown by us anyway)--like the CR9 and E175 I believe. But hey, your flames sure are funny. Keep it up, and try out at the Laugh Barn in Marrietta on Thursday nights.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Amazing!! I've been reading about this issue for months now and this post pretty much sums of the ignorance of someone flying "HEAVY" metal. Most are of the opinion that the E175 somehow should be on the DL property before the CRJ 900. Yet the 900 generates more profit than a E175...Reference Fuel burn, MX...total trip cost. So ask yourself which of the two is more of the threat? But here is the real issue and where the PRIDE of mainline pilots frustrate me. Has ANYONE (mainline pilot) noticed what is going on with the Q400X and ATR 72-600? These are going to 90 seat turboprobs with speed and range that makes flying your "Heavy" metal on stage lenghts of 400 miles or less MUCH MUCH more expensive than a E175-900-737-take your pick. So my question to you is what is your scope on turboprop aircraft??

So, until you...the mainline pilot that constanly fears loosing your job to the meazly regional pilot realizes that MGT will always find a way around your scope, you are regulated to complaining.

Since derugulation your pride has been and will be your demize. You'll always alow a little bigger, a little more, and a little faster aircraft on YOUR property, because as long as YOUR job is preceived to be safe you'll sell out the same people you complain are threating your jobs. Funny these are the pilots that have been supplimenting your pay for years...to quote Jack nickolis in a Few Good Men..."I'd just rather you say Thank You...." But let me guess THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT??

I'll tell you what, when ??? regional airline pulls up next to you in a DL Q400X please don't complain, please don't feel threatened...after all I'm sure his penis is much smaller than yours...after all he is only a regional pilot...

I look forward to the day when YOUR pilot group decides to demand and do what it takes to get ALL BRAND FLYING under your list from your fellow union members....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom