777forever
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Posts
- 1,535
once the newness wears off, you'll miss the ATR.
Oh of course Im going to miss it. Shoot, I miss flying a 172
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
once the newness wears off, you'll miss the ATR.
Off topic but, going from the ATR to the Jet is like going from SPAM to fillet mignon for dinner...The sim instructor was like, "you're going to feel like you're at a different airline"
How many seats do they have in them? I know they originally came with 70 and thats what the SkyWest website shows. I have heard they are being converted to 76 seats though. Whats the status?
All of SkyWest's 900's are now configured with 76 seats.
Speed....
You seem pretty emphatic when you say 90's coming to ASA. In an exchange I had with our boss over my concerns about the direction of this company, and the fact that they keep patting us on the back left and right, but no rewards seem to come, as we watch everyone else growing in out only playground.......I was told no 90's are coming to ASA, because our costs are too high, as compared to Pinnacle, Mesaba and Compass. I think the merger will be our downfall at ASA, as it opens the door for these NWA carriers. So, we are being overlooked for cheapness alone. I keep asking everyone to explain to me how the costs are calculated, and how we compare to the costs of others. Maybe our cost of operation is more due to the environment we operate in, as compared to others. Nobody has an answer, other than we are expensive.
Anyway, I'll cling to your enthusiasm and keep hoping that eventually something good will happen at ASA.
Joe,
Were you left behind? It appears you got a nice raise, signing bonus, and a rig like everyone else.
Who was left behind?
We never had 900's. At least I never saw a single one on the ramp. However, we did have ATR's!
By default, you are going to the jet. However, after a few months you will wonder why you didn't bid it before. Life is good at altitude and an aircraft that has some reliability.
Won't matter. ASA is the 4th lowest cost lift provider, among the current DCI portfolio. Add Mesaba and Compass and ASA is the 6th lowest. We are waaaaay down on the list to get any new airframes.
Jumpers,
I don't have a problem with the rest of your post. But I do question your airplane recognition skills.
Skywest has 17 CRJ900, and none of them has ever been registered with an EV tail number. You probably won't believe me, so you can search the FAA database. All of them went from the temporary factory canadian registration, to an SK tail number.
Were the 900's destined for ASA? I don't know. But I do know that none of them ever had an EV registration.
I don't need to search the FAA database- I know what I saw......it taxied right in front of me. I still remember the anger I fealt. Say what you wish, what you found on the FAA website, etc- I know what I saw, and I know my aircraft types.
Are you sure it wasn't a 700? SkyWest operated 4 former ASA birds, originally with EV tail numbers although they were later re-registered to SK.
How is it that you guys claim to know what the costs of doing business are at all these carriers? How do you know that ASA is more expensive to run than Mesaba? Personally, I think its a pretty far fetched idea that Mesaba can operate 17 CRJ-200s cheaper than ASA can operate 110 of them regardless of a pilot contract.
If you have studied knowledge of the balance sheets on these carriers please identify that. If your just an armchair executive please make that known so we can ignore you.