CA1900
Big Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2002
- Posts
- 5,436
Now if that was his lead in for the video dating service it'd be another story![]()
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GxL1uXwSrdU
:laugh:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now if that was his lead in for the video dating service it'd be another story![]()
Southwest "Captain" ....
He said he was with SWA 8 years. That would put him as a 'Lance' Captain status. Meaning that he is a First Officer (notice the 3 stripes), but he is Captain qualified. Top 8% of the F/O list. He therefore flies a F/O line, but can pick up Captain trips in open time, giveaway, etc. Hope this explains the apparent discrepancy.
Am I the only one that thinks this guy may have been helping out a school with this video and had nothing but the best of intentions?...If he has earned the right to be called Captain then he should use that title in such a manner.
"Lance" Captain? Are you serious?
He is a lance Captain but still an F/O... he is considered by the company as an F/O, bids F/O lines and has to either pick-up Captain trips in between his F/O trips or give all F/O trips away and grab Captain trips out of trip-trade-giveaway or bid for them in open time. He is an F/O period, qualified to fly as a Captain when he can.
So what if he called himself a Captain. We all know he's an F/O. You can bet when he goes to his adopt-a-pilot class he's got that fourth bar on.
Hi..um..I'm a cap..uh, captain...I enjoy the rain and the sun...buh-deep, buh-deep, buh-deep...that's all folks! /end drunk Daffy Duck voice
You're kidding... Who the hell is advocating this?Don't laugh too hard. I've heard some of the idiots at our company that want to get this in our next contract.
You sound jealous. If he is the pilot in command, then he is the Captain. I'm sure the FAA considers him the Captain, and that is what matters. Give the guy a break. Where is the LUV?
You're kidding... Who the hell is advocating this?
This would simply reduce the number of CA's they have to upgrade to cover the existing flying.
At a company like Southwest that won't jeopardize safety by building rear-loaded red-eyes and such, they staff an appropriate number of CA's so I wouldn't imagine it's such a big deal.
However, with a company that staffs thin as a course of doing business and saving money, giving them a way to leave F/O's on F/O pay and just giving them the ability to pick up CA time when they have extra CA flying in open time seems like a free ticket to always staff the CA seat too low for operations and letting the senior F/O's pick up the slack.
rear-loaded red-eyes
I'm sorry? say again? did you honestly detect a jealous tone to that?
what a tool.