Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Hello Ual Goodbye Usappy

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
All the grandiose explanations of usapa are bs. The only reason it was voted in is because a few guys somehow convinced 2700 usair fools that usapa would overturn the Nic.

Has nothing to do with ALPA.

It was all about a do-over, plain and simple.

Do you think ALPA has your interests in mind. My first ALPA red flag came when I was with eastern and Hank Duffy (a delta pilot) was president. for some reason other carriers hired us Eastern Pilots however the PRESIDENT of ALPA could not help at his own airline. This is not directly related to this thread however for me it was the beginning of what is now 19 years on ALPA membership with not much to show for it. In the unfortunate event of UAL/US merger I would certainly not vote to keep ALPA. I would prefer in house where I know the union has my fellow pilots interests at heart and is not in conflict with the regional pilots wishes. UAPA
 
You just proved my point:

I KNOW usapa does not have my best interest in mind. In fact they are trying to screw me and 1700 other pilots they represent.

I don't like ALPA anymore than anyone else. But at least they are doing some good (safety, security, etc.). usapa has nothing. Zero, nada. They are not a union in any sense of the word, it's simply an attempt at a redo. They've done a good job at passing this off as a shot at ALPA, and a lot of people are buying it. In reality though it's entitlement. Plain and simple.
 
You really need to think about what you just said. If you do not pay dues to the union you have no legal right to sue the union for a DFR if you are not a member of that union.

If you do not join you can not sue. Ask you high priced lawyer.


Could be as simple as a Lawyer Representing the West Pilot Group suing usapa (the east pilot group) for not living up to the agreement that they as the east group agreed to before going to Binding Arbitration. Certainly you can see where the Leaders of this effort to circumnavigate the Nicolau Award would have reason to be concerned.

Fast
 
You just proved my point:

I KNOW usapa does not have my best interest in mind. In fact they are trying to screw me and 1700 other pilots they represent.

I don't like ALPA anymore than anyone else. But at least they are doing some good (safety, security, etc.). usapa has nothing. Zero, nada. They are not a union in any sense of the word, it's simply an attempt at a redo. They've done a good job at passing this off as a shot at ALPA, and a lot of people are buying it. In reality though it's entitlement. Plain and simple.

I agree that USAir pilots do have an image problem which they need to improve on. A lot of that is from the bs ALPA published. That aside when I show guys I am flying with the nic award and show them the lopsided award they understand why they did what they did. A nic type award would not fly here (ual) either.
 
I agree that USAir pilots do have an image problem which they need to improve on. A lot of that is from the bs ALPA published. That aside when I show guys I am flying with the nic award and show them the lopsided award they understand why they did what they did. A nic type award would not fly here (ual) either.

Sorry you find FACTs "BS". After an arbitrator hands down his award, an award that was entered into as a result of binding arbitration, nobody gives a damn if it will "fly" at your airline. It's too late, it's over. it's the Law. No childish antics...like simply changing your name will not work.
 
I agree that USAir pilots do have an image problem which they need to improve on. A lot of that is from the bs ALPA published. That aside when I show guys I am flying with the nic award and show them the lopsided award they understand why they did what they did. A nic type award would not fly here (ual) either.

Eaglesview,

Could you illuminate for us how exactly it is lopsided.

I guess you would agree with the AAA opinion of the award since it would seem that your "Career Expectations" are rapidly starting to resemble those of the AAA pilots in May 05. Those attitudes must come with the territory.

Fast
 
Are you saying you'd be happy with a DOH integration with the USAir Easties? Really?

TWA Dude, if it comes down to a merger I think you'll find the United/ US Airways lists to be pretty compatible.

Put another way, the Nic award will be just as problematic to the United pilots as it is to the East.

I see the junior Captain at United is a 1998 DOH can anyone from United tell me how many pilots are below him/her on their list?
 
I would put my money on Eaglesview not being a united pilot...he only has 20 posts and they all started a couple weeks ago RE united/us air and are all pro DOH....hmmm.

What a total waste of time this site has become....
 
Put another way, the Nic award will be just as problematic to the United pilots as it is to the East.

quote]


And how do you arrive at that conclusion?

Merging UAL's list and LCC's Nic list will insulate UAL from the DOH argument that petrified UAL in the past. The Nic list will not work if a DOH argument is attempted by the group the east calls a union.


Fast
 
TWA Dude, if it comes down to a merger I think you'll find the United/ US Airways lists to be pretty compatible.
I didn't realize y'all were that old. I would think the UAL MEC would issue a statement in favor of a merger with USAirways if that was really the case.
 
Last edited:
I would put my money on Eaglesview not being a united pilot...he only has 20 posts and they all started a couple weeks ago RE united/us air and are all pro DOH....hmmm.

What a total waste of time this site has become....

Good call.....if he truly was UAL, he would have no problem remembering 8 years ago when AAA was floating up their DOH balloons. That BS was met with the same enthusiasm that the AWA pilots gave it. In a DOH integration with UAL, the late 80s guys that were on furlough a couple of years ago would be able to hold 75/76 Captain. And best of all, they wouldn't even consider it a windfall!

The only way DOH makes it into the discussion is if they use their LCC hire date (May 2005).
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom