NetJets Smoking Question

[fischman]

Carbon offsets for smoking...

No we should not tolerate it. Just because you have money does not mean you can do anything you want.

I disagree 100%. Some of our owners use us for the reason that they CAN have a smoke. It is THEIR airplane. Would you tell them they can't smoke in their own house??? Of course not!

This is cliche`, but if you don't like it I heard SWA is hiring. It is part of the job here.

 

[gunfyter]

HAZMAT Dangerous Goods

I am not talking about here. I am talking about an FAR banning smoking on all airplanes. 91 135 121 etc..

 

[FLYLOW22]

Carbon offsets for smoking...

No we should not tolerate it. Just because you have money does not mean you can do anything you want.

True. In this case, however, the Owner has already bought and paid for the very thing you are trying to debate.

Smoking is allowed. MOST (99.6%) of the Owners don't smoke because they are well-educated people and they have read about the effects of smoking.

I have had someone smoke in the plane 5 times in 6 years. I guess I'm due for another soon.

It's really no big deal though once you get through the initial surprise of flying along and smelling the 1st puff of smoke.

 

[Diesel]

i think if you held a survey of all the owners the amount of owners in favor in banning smoking on planes for their own personal comfort would far outweigh a few owners that smoke.

When owners smoke they not only put the crew in a health danger, but they also at times make the plane unsuitable for use shortly after the owners depart the plane.

It has been shown through various studies that restaurants and apartment buildings who don't allow smoking have a significant higher goods sold and a higher selling price.

 

[Voice Of Reason]

Smoking is allowed. MOST (99.6%) of the Owners don't smoke because they are well-educated people and they have read about the effects of smoking.

.

Gotta love anecdotal "evidence" from the masses...

 

[gunfyter]

Maybe Wilson Poll could determine which is more distracting to a crew ... I-pod music or smoke?

 

[fischman]

When owners smoke they not only put the crew in a health danger.

Come on man. That is ridiculous. I've been here almost 4 years and in that time I have had less than a handful of smokers. That is not a health danger.

Plus if you are THAT offended by it, put on the mask, or go to a 121 carrier where it is prohibited.

 

[Diesel]

I didn't realize you were an MD. Must be tough doing all those transplants and fly those 7 day trips.

We have a lot of crews here that pride themselves on the marathons they run and the workouts they do. (i'm not one of them )

I don't care what they do because I do a lot of worse stuff to my body, but I'm not going to poo poo their healthy lifestyle or health concerns that they might have from 2nd hand smoke.

 

[gunfyter]

I guess it may not be that bad if you do not happen to be allergic. I probably have used about 30 sick days due to smoking flights... over 9 years.

I finally got on 2 allergy meds which cost me about $65/mo co-pay... and took shots every couple of weeks for 3 years... which has reduced the incidence of actually having to DNIF. But I still feel bad after exposure to smoke.

 

[TWA]

If you don't like the smoke, there is nothing stopping you from finding a different job where you won't encounter that type of health risk. God knows there are 100 people ready and willing to take your place that won't mind it.

 

[Diesel]

Only 100? Probably 10's of thousands, but those here aren't going to lower a personal bar because someone else wants their job.

Good luck with that application.

 

[fischman]

If you don't like the smoke, there is nothing stopping you from finding a different job where you won't encounter that type of health risk.

Bingo.

It is a SMALL part of thejob.

If you can't stand the heat, time to get out of the kitchen

 

[gunfyter]

No. Time to work to end the injustice.

Hopefully we are only a few months away from a more LABOR-friendly administration (not in the pocket of big-tobacco) who will see the injustice that flight-crews are one of the only groups not guaranteed a Smoke-free work environment.

 

[fischman]

I didn't realize you were an MD. Must be tough doing all those transplants and fly those 7 day trips.

We have a lot of crews here that pride themselves on the marathons they run and the workouts they do. (i'm not one of them )

I don't care what they do because I do a lot of worse stuff to my body, but I'm not going to poo poo their healthy lifestyle or health concerns that they might have from 2nd hand smoke.

Never claimed to be an MD did I? I'm just saying that a couple of flights over the span of YEARS is not a "health danger" and is melodramatic. Chill out man

 

[gunfyter]

I am not an MD ... but I studied quantum electrodynamics in college.

Here is one of the major processes that cause lung cancer.

It was mentioned that a higher health risk exists because of the time one spends at high altitude. There is exposure to higher radiation levels.

Yes there is more radiation but the radiation mostly passes through you with no effect. HOWEVER if you are a smoker or have smoke or other particulates in the lungs...

Radiation particles adhere to the smoke particulates in the air and the lungs. The smoke particulates then stick to mucus in the lungs -- with the potentially dangerous radiation particles. If not for the smoke you exposure to these particles lasts only as long as the flight. Not so if you exposed to both smoke and radiation.

When these particles stuck in your mucus decay ... hours or days later ... you risk the cause of a cancer in the lungs.

This is the same reason living in a home with high levels of RADON gas can cause lung cancer ... but mostly only to people who smoke or work in very dusty conditions like a coal mine.