I hear you.
I read what you put before you edited... Yes, I would like a small raise now, some equity, and then a new and improved agreement... Why not? Why divide the groups from the get go...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hear you.
Could you please post the actual language of the LOA regarding a "parity trigger"?
I've written enough MEC resolutions to understand this one. "...to bring about..." means "try", not "will".
I hear the words. I'm watching the feet.
It would not be a big deal for you to get it. After all, everyone had more before the SLI deal failed.I read what you put before you edited... Yes, I would like a small raise now, some equity, and then a new and improved agreement... Why not? Why divide the groups from the get go...
Don't expect us to do all the heavy lifting. You need to take ownership and responsibility for your PWA, which was negotiated because of your different priorities and you need to contribute to negotiating a joint contract as well. We will work with you to get parity ASAP, but we wont do it alone.
There is a timeline to get it done.![]()
I hope your watching the feet of your negotiators. They ought to be heading to work to get a joint contract.
We could have a List within a month if both sides are willing to either:
We should have had one already. In which case we all would haveall been better off.
1. Hunker-down and get it done.
That would have been best done back in February. There was a short period of time to get it done, unfortunately some thought there was no timeline. Time ran out on Monday.
2. Frame an expedited arbitration process.
I don't see it happening. Expedited negotiations yes, otherwise we'll rely on merger policy as is.
All we need to do it is "want to".
Agreed. We want a joint contract and negotiated list ASAP. Arbitration is for losers.
Both sides will hunker-down for a week to flesh out options and strategy.
You built nothing into your "I've got mine!" LOA to at least include the basic improvements?
Not good.
I do not understand the NWA gnashing of teeth. (especially after reading all of LOA 19, it isn't great and it is clearly designed as a short term fix to set a floor for a subsequent joint agreement) As you learn more, or as the LOA leaks out, I think you will agree this was much ado about nothing
100% BS and lip-service. DALPA has lost all faith with NWA guys. This BS is just a feeble attempt at saving face. Actions speak louder than words, and DALPA actions show them in bed with management in an attempt to screw over another pilot union. In fact, these words could have just as easily been printed by management. Sounds just like them. It will bite them back--guaranteed. Their weak a#$ excuses don't cut it-period.
We'll see how efficient this airline operates in the coming months if the BS doesn't get reversed ASAP. They complained about last summers staffing problem. I think we may be even leaner this summer. Not pretty.
DALPA, NWA pilots aren't your partners. You already F'd that one up! Save your welcomes for our EMT.
Schwanker
One of our Captains asked an LEC member on the phone about what NWA was asking for in SLI. Here was the response on our Dalpa forum:
"A month ago when they were arguing SLI, I took the 10 minutes to call my LEC Rep. He told me NWA wanted the top 500 spots on the combined list, due to their Premium Widebody (747) and Big Airbus flying. He said they only considered our 10 777's as "True Widebodys" discounting our 767-400's and all the ER's completely.
Then there would be some sort of 1-1, which would leave the bottom 2,000+ on the combined list 100% Delta. They also wanted to count all their 787 "Firm Orders" but not count our equally firm 777 orders.
Now, I got this from my LEC rep, but I don't know if our LEC's were fully briefed on exactly what was going on in negotiations, or if this was just a rumor running around the MEC, but that's what he told me. When I got done laughing, I told him that is complete lunacy. He agreed, he said the ALPA National guy in the room also agreed they were nuts. He said NWA brought their Arbitration Lawyer to the negotiations, so what does that tell you?"
Kinda Hillarious. But, I guess our guys were LYING.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Delta pilots sure have done some heavy lifting all right. Pay raises that don't keep up with inflation and massive furloughs in two years. And don't forget the magic beans and the relaxation of scope!
Wow!
Yeah a cap at 255 76 seaters. That allows them to order up to 60 more big RJs.There may indeed be furloughs, but if any pilot can avoid that for over 2 years (24 months after merger is complete) then they have a good chance of not getting furloughed. What was relaxed in scope? More 76 seaters I take it? That alone is the only reason needed to automatically vote no.
I agree, and that's 255 B I G G O RJ's.255 RJs....gawd, what are you guys smoking? Heck, I thought NWA scope was bad...sheesh.
Beware...Elmer is coming!
Nu
One of our Captains asked an LEC member on the phone about what NWA was asking for in SLI. Here was the response on our Dalpa forum:
"A month ago when they were arguing SLI, I took the 10 minutes to call my LEC Rep. He told me NWA wanted the top 500 spots on the combined list, due to their Premium Widebody (747) and Big Airbus flying. He said they only considered our 10 777's as "True Widebodys" discounting our 767-400's and all the ER's completely.
Then there would be some sort of 1-1, which would leave the bottom 2,000+ on the combined list 100% Delta. They also wanted to count all their 787 "Firm Orders" but not count our equally firm 777 orders.
Now, I got this from my LEC rep, but I don't know if our LEC's were fully briefed on exactly what was going on in negotiations, or if this was just a rumor running around the MEC, but that's what he told me. When I got done laughing, I told him that is complete lunacy. He agreed, he said the ALPA National guy in the room also agreed they were nuts. He said NWA brought their Arbitration Lawyer to the negotiations, so what does that tell you?"
Kinda Hillarious. But, I guess our guys were LYING.
Bye Bye--General Lee
For what its worth thats almost a complete 180 from what i heard from one of our union reps. It sure would be nice to get something on paper signed and presented by both parties to see what the real story was.
There are a couple of NWA guys on this forum that would be pissed if they got a 50% raise and all the Delta guys stapled to the bottom.lets be honest there are some of those on each side of the fenceThe simple fact is DALPA realized this deal was going down with or without us and they got us something in the deal. The NWA MEC decided not to get anything for the NWA guys and somehow that is DALPA's fault. If you are pissed that we have this LOA, then your complaints should be directed to your screwed up MEC not DALPA. There was no possible way for DALPA to get anything for NWA pilots unless they agreed on a joint SLI. We can all fight about that later. What DALPA has done is made the job of your dysfunctional MEC a bit easier by raising the rates 5%.
There are a couple of NWA guys on this forum that would be pissed if they got a 50% raise and all the Delta guys stapled to the bottom. The simple fact is DALPA realized this deal was going down with or without us and they got us something in the deal. The NWA MEC decided not to get anything for the NWA guys and somehow that is DALPA's fault. If you are pissed that we have this LOA, then your complaints should be directed to your screwed up MEC not DALPA. There was no possible way for DALPA to get anything for NWA pilots unless they agreed on a joint SLI. We can all fight about that later. What DALPA has done is made the job of your disfunctional MEC a bit easier by raising the rates 5%.
We're not hunkered down at all. To us the course is clear. Get a joint contract, get a mutually agreed to list, build a world class airline with world class compensation.
The invitation to negotiate towards that goal is out there.
Agreed. We want a joint contract and negotiated list ASAP. Arbitration is for losers.
Attitudes out on the line can be completely different than attitudes on this forum. From my experiences, Delta pilots really DO want fairness for everyone, and to get a common contract quickly. They don't expect an SLI that disproportionately favors them. They've already been through a bitter time, and now that things were improving, don't want to go back to working with miserable, hostile coworkers (original DL or original NWA). Of course, that can all change when someone is faced with displacement or furlough... when family life begins to suffer, all congeniality evaporates.
I hope both sides can stay positive and constructive. I've heard many times through the pipeline that some members of NWA's MEC are difficult to negotiate with. Maybe NWA guys are told the same about our guys. I'm curious about exactly what SLI deals were offered, but am trying not to get hung up by it. Let's move forward!
Slappy...you and I are going to be muy simpatico when this lash-up gets together! :beer:
You've got a good handle of the situation, especially this part: "I've heard many times through the pipeline that some members of NWA's MEC are difficult to negotiate with."
Is a pig's butt pork?
Since they're my brothers...I'll try to find something "nice" to say about them.
um....
um...
Got it!
It appears they have opposable thumbs.
You've got a good handle of the situation, especially this part: "I've heard many times through the pipeline that some members of NWA's MEC are difficult to negotiate with."
Is a pig's butt pork?
Yeah a cap at 255 76 seaters. That allows them to order up to 60 more big RJs.
Agree on the items. Disagree on the sequence. You've gotten a bump.
That bump + is there for all of us with a joint contract.
I saw your contrails. Nothing...not even a kick-butt contract, will happen until the list is settled.
Why, there is a certain path to list integration. We can follow ALPA policy and settle the issue in any economic environment. The same is not true of a joint contract. There the path is more fuzzy.
(Is that point open for discussion?) Why that order? As you'll recall, getting the hefty contract in January did us NO GOOD because we didn't have a list.
I think the order is driven by the economics. Of course if we can get it all wrapped up quickly through negotiations, even simultaneously it can be a win-win.
The TFA had value for the company because it settled unknowns and allowed more flexibility to utilize their assets seemlessly. Why, because we all would have agreed to it and rapidly become one pilot group.
Absent a joint contract and a SLI, there is less value in this for the corporation, therefore less for us all.
So it seems to me the first order of business will be negotiations on the list. I'll be watching the DALPA brothers feet to see if they engage on that.
I'll send you a PM on that.
It sure would be nice to get something on paper signed and presented by both parties to see what the real story was.