~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Bill - Since you're the Boss - let me put a "Executive Overview" on the cover of my TPS report.
Now a quote during NWA's last Quarterly Earnings Call with their CEO:
NWA's MEC thinks they have this covered with a bi-lateral flow through (again to keep the side door for "preferred" candidates). I'm not so sure. Flow through agreements are a future promise that the airline might, or might not, be able to keep in this age of musical operating certificates.
Our MEC's and the Company are at the table. There is an opportunity to fix scope, if there is the desire to fix it.
-if they are parked it will likely be after the operational integration (nobody will do anything until DOJ approves and the ink is dry), at which point it is job losses for the combined list. Even if there are fences, if the DC9 jobs go away those pilots slot in where their seniority would hold.
The issue is not the DC9's per se , but there is no replacement acft named yet.
Now a quote during NWA's last Quarterly Earnings Call with their CEO:
Over and over again the investors asked about the DC-9. Over and over NWA management made it clear that the RJ's are coming and are not restricted.Ray Neidl - Calyon Securities
Yeah, just to clarify with the DC9 fleets' shrinking and you having the big jump with RJ usage. Is there some point you might back up against some restraints and just go up close restrictions with just your pilots?
Douglas Steenland
No.
NWA's MEC thinks they have this covered with a bi-lateral flow through (again to keep the side door for "preferred" candidates). I'm not so sure. Flow through agreements are a future promise that the airline might, or might not, be able to keep in this age of musical operating certificates.
Our MEC's and the Company are at the table. There is an opportunity to fix scope, if there is the desire to fix it.