Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta and ASA close call in ATL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I heard the same thing. However, could this be a case of a 500 hr FO believing what he thought he heard, and a CA letting his guard down?
 
I heard the same thing. However, could this be a case of a 500 hr FO believing what he thought he heard, and a CA letting his guard down?

.... it was a low time FO, but the bigger problem was probably all of the BS that is supposed to be briefed on the way to the runway........... Recipe flying is more harmful than helpful......The more "briefing" that goes on, the less brain power and listening that is devoted to important stuff like holding short of a runway that aircraft are departing on......

The irony is that this will result in yet another stupid procedure from the FAA/GO geeks that will simply make the problem even worse.....
 
......Hillary is no different than your "Obama".....they both want more Federal Govt........
So do the Republicans. Have you not been paying attention to Bush's reign over the past 7 years? His prescription drug benefit was a huge addition to the federal government, and it's costing us billions. No matter who you elect, government is going to get bigger. Not even Reagan could stop the spending increases, no matter how hard he tried.
This could have been much worse.....looks like our aircraft was taxiing out for departure..... my guess is there was a bunch of "briefing" going on.... that is what the FAA and the GO types do to try and fix these problems..... which results in more of these situations..... too much "briefing" and not enough paying attention..... I don't care if the TO ITT is 765 or 764.... I care about not hitting someone.....
Agree with you on this one. Far too much talking and not enough paying attention in today's cockpits. We have callouts and briefings for every little thing. It's making things worse, not better.
Off the topic, but why do you think Obama is any different than Hillary.....
Well, for starters, I don't think he's so devoid of humanity and morality that he'd do absolutely anything to attain and hold on to power. The Clintons have no morals and ethics, and the only thing that has ever mattered to either of them is their own quest for power. Because of that, I'd support anyone over Hillary. But I also think Obama has a decent solution for healthcare, I like his proposal to increase the payroll tax on wealthy income earners to help pay for SS, I like the middle-class tax cuts, etc...
 
.... it was a low time FO, but the bigger problem was probably all of the BS that is supposed to be briefed on the way to the runway........... Recipe flying is more harmful than helpful......The more "briefing" that goes on, the less brain power and listening that is devoted to important stuff like holding short of a runway that aircraft are departing on......

The irony is that this will result in yet another stupid procedure from the FAA/GO geeks that will simply make the problem even worse.....

I agree to an extent, briefings have become redundant, FAA induced, highly ignored matters for the CVR. However responsibility falls to the CA. It's his ship, his responsibility, hold the briefing off for less taxing times (and less taxiing times)!
 
.... it was a low time FO, but the bigger problem was probably all of the BS that is supposed to be briefed on the way to the runway........... Recipe flying is more harmful than helpful......The more "briefing" that goes on, the less brain power and listening that is devoted to important stuff like holding short of a runway that aircraft are departing on......

The irony is that this will result in yet another stupid procedure from the FAA/GO geeks that will simply make the problem even worse.....

Isn't this ATL? Meaning they were crossing the runway after landing and switching over to the dept. tower freq. What would they be briefing then? How bout we wait until we find out a fact or two.
 
Isn't this ATL? Meaning they were crossing the runway after landing and switching over to the dept. tower freq. What would they be briefing then? How bout we wait until we find out a fact or two.

They were taxing out for 28 departure.....Are you a fan of the "brief everything"?
 
ahh- i see.
no- i agree w/ not losing the forest for all the trees- but i've seen both ways go too far- too much and you have your point- too little- and you have pilots 5 months after a PC having no idea how they would actually perform a V1 cut or GA.

That's not the issue though- the problem then would be why brief anywhere near a runway-especially on that long of a taxi-where's the hurry? Better yet, why not do that at the gate?

You have valid points though- What is ASA doing that makes you think that's the culprit?
 
I was taught to clear visually before taking off. It's a pretty common technique in the AF.]

Yea, as civilians we are taught just close your eyes,trust the controllers,firewall power and when you can't hold her on the ground any longer...pull back on the yoke.That's how MEN do it. Don't worry if you pull to hard, cause you got a shaker thing that tells you if you did it wrong. I taxi in the blind, take off in the blind,fly in the blind,land in the blind and above all...I lead the blind!! I AM LEGEND!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
I was taught to clear visually before taking off. It's a pretty common technique in the AF. Maybe it used to be at Delta, but it's kinda scary what they're bringing on these days. Maybe it's just par for the course now.


How do you visually clear something that has not yet crossed into your path? Further more how do you visually clear the guy that is supposed to be holding short of your runway? The answer is you can't. Now if your comment was it's smart to look down the runway (as far as you can see) if you are the flying pilot , I would agree. I've seen both heads down while the power was being set (while jump seating) and wonder how we stayed on the center line. Sometimes you have to trust the other person who's holding short and sometimes they brain fade and or just don't see you, just like in traffic when you are driving.........
Do you have a crystal ball that you look at before you start rolling down the runway?
 
They were taxing out for 28 departure.....Are you a fan of the "brief everything"?

Joe:
While I don't agree with you on just about anything, I'll give you this one.....Briefings should be done at the gate.....That's DL's policy. I also agree with you that more time breifing while taxiing, especially while in ATL, can be distracting. Complacancy can hurt you sometimes......

737

BTW tanker clown, you are nothing more than a miserable POS flying a desk! Get a life loser!
 
why do you all even respond to some of these guys- deafening silence would be best don't you think.
 
ahh- i see.
no- i agree w/ not losing the forest for all the trees- but i've seen both ways go too far- too much and you have your point- too little- and you have pilots 5 months after a PC having no idea how they would actually perform a V1 cut or GA.

That's not the issue though- the problem then would be why brief anywhere near a runway-especially on that long of a taxi-where's the hurry? Better yet, why not do that at the gate?

You have valid points though- What is ASA doing that makes you think that's the culprit?

In 13 years at ASA I have seen the briefings get longer and longer..... and they take away from paying attention to the important stuff.....

We now have a d@mn college disertation on the back of the load manifest that is supposed to be briefed on the way to the runway..... I tell the FO they can brief it if they want, but if they do I won't listen.... and I turn them down....

The amount of BS in the briefs these days is incredible...... all created by pencil necked geeks sitting in conference rooms who think they are important and are trying to climb up the ladder....

This incident will result in yet another procedure that will detract from the act of being a pilot....

As to your point, you shouldn't have to brief how to do a V1 cut or a GA..... that's what being a pilot is..... Just do it and quit the vocal recipe flying.....
 
Stupid Procedure....

I have been complaining for some time about the new procedure ATL has for crossing on the southside.

We are told to switch to a new tower freq. up to three times during our taxi to/from that new runway. Each time they say "monitor tower on XXX.XX." The problem is that you are gone from one freq, not confirmed up on the next, and here you are supposedly holding short of an active runway. It is obvious that we could have someone on the wrong freq. (two-way comm still is not confirmed) get all confused and go trucking right across.

It would be simple and easy to just say "Contact tower, freq. XXX.XX" rather than this silly "monitor tower" garbage. This would ensure not only that you are now on the correct freq, but each person would confirm holding short when checking on. I am not sure whether this was a factor today, but I have been trying to warn people for a long time.....
 
Joe:
While I don't agree with you on just about anything, I'll give you this one.....Briefings should be done at the gate.....That's DL's policy. I also agree with you that more time breifing while taxiing, especially while in ATL, can be distracting. Complacancy can hurt you sometimes......

737

BTW tanker clown, you are nothing more than a miserable POS flying a desk! Get a life loser!

Anytime we can agree is progress......
:beer:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom