Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA to open new Hub!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I second that about General Irrelevant.

And back to the original question, I predict ASA will be flying out of at least one, and maybe two United hubs before 2008 is over. Most likely IAD, and possibly ORD.

Mesa is on the verge of implosion, and UAL will dump them (for a second time). UAL lifted the no-compete clause, so Skywest can fly for both UAL and DAL in LAX. SkyWest Inc will take over Mesa's UAL flying... SkyWest Airlines will move back to the Left Coast and ASA will cover all SkyWest Inc flying east of the Mississippi.
 
I think the General is drinking so much Kool Aid he might be in danger of drowning! What a TOTAL IDIOT! If DAL told this fool to go and hold up a liquor store, he would would say "ski mask? Hell, I'll just wear my penguin suit-no one would dare question my authority to rob any store I choose! I work for DAL-By God!"

"Do it Once and Do it Right?" Ring a bell-moron? How about "Bankruptcy-proof pensions" for the execs? What type of honorable company would ever do these things? Let me see.....Delta? Why the insane level of loyalty? General, did they make you the Grand Marshall at the last Gay Pride parade they sponsored?

You are once seriously obsessed monkey-General, go and get a hobby, take a walk, get a dog, do something other than give DAL virtual BJs all day long on FlightInfo.

-Truth is-NO ONE here cares what you think anymore! You have lost whatever cedibility you had by being the biggest excuse-making, rationalizing, pollyanna ever to hit the internet!

People don't care about me anymore? Booo-hoo. Oh well, I honestly DON'T CARE. Anyway, I think I will be right about the parking of the 50s. Oil has a way of getting rid of planes, like our 737-200s. The smaller RJs are next. The larger RJs--CR9s and E170s--can't be added too fast due to the fact that they need gate space which is a limited asset, and we are actually gaining more mainline planes next year to use those assets, even on the domestic side. Maybe you have heard about some of the planes we are getting next year? 9 MD90s and 7 737-700s have been anounced so far, along with some new 777s. Some of those MD90s and 737s will most likely take back some RJ routes. I think that would be wonderful. Bye now Jmoney. (Mr. Credibility himself)

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
I second that about General Irrelevant.

And back to the original question, I predict ASA will be flying out of at least one, and maybe two United hubs before 2008 is over. Most likely IAD, and possibly ORD.

Mesa is on the verge of implosion, and UAL will dump them (for a second time). UAL lifted the no-compete clause, so Skywest can fly for both UAL and DAL in LAX. SkyWest Inc will take over Mesa's UAL flying... SkyWest Airlines will move back to the Left Coast and ASA will cover all SkyWest Inc flying east of the Mississippi.

Very unrealistic dreaming. United would rather have Republic or Shuttle America (same) flying their nicer E170s than your planes. They will be getting 17 more shortly when Delta replaces, one for one, their E170s with E175s. Mesa's IAD ops could also be replaced by more experienced NE feeders that already provide them 50 seaters--like CHQ E145s or TranStates E145s. They already use them and they are better than Mesa. Maybe you should dream about seniority integration with SkyWest.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
General, it's disappointing that you'd rather see flying going to non-ALPA carriers like CHQ while ALPA carriers lose their flying. You should know better.
 
General, it's disappointing that you'd rather see flying going to non-ALPA carriers like CHQ while ALPA carriers lose their flying. You should know better.

PCL128, take off your rose colored glasses.... The General is simply expressing the view of most mainline pilots.... They don't care who does it as long as it is cheap, so that there is more money for them..... If they really cared, you would see "brand scope".....
 
PCL128, take off your rose colored glasses.... The General is simply expressing the view of most mainline pilots..

Joe, I'm not wearing any rose-colored glasses. I know exactly what most mainline pilots think. That doesn't make it any less disappointing and unfortunate.
 
Yeah let DAL pay the higher fuel bill on the E-170/175 much higher=coming out of your wallet, not ours !!

9 MD90s(that is nothing to brag about)

General where are you going to be and the rest of DAL when they merge next year....And I can guarantee my source is at the top-if you know what i mean. Right Ohplease you know my source!!!

DALLAS people can tell you I told them in July, that year!
 
Joe, I'm not wearing any rose-colored glasses. I know exactly what most mainline pilots think. That doesn't make it any less disappointing and unfortunate.

Unfortunate: Yes......

Dissappointing: Only if you were expecting something different..... I expect that from most mainline pilots....That's why I don't expect much to change....
 
Unfortunate: Yes......

Dissappointing: Only if you were expecting something different..... I expect that from most mainline pilots....That's why I don't expect much to change....

I don't expect anything different from most mainline pilots, but I did expect better from the General. He's generally well informed and intelligent, and turning your back on your union brothers is bad form, even if they do fly smaller airplanes.
 
General, it's disappointing that you'd rather see flying going to non-ALPA carriers like CHQ while ALPA carriers lose their flying. You should know better.

I didn't say I would RATHER have them do it, I think it is more likely. ASA has a terrible reputation in the airline industry due to their performance in ATL, and that will spill over into any new flying they would like to have with anyone else. I never said I wanted non-ALPA carriers to do the job, just ones that will help our organzation, not hurt it. ASA is always in the news, giving us yet another black eye because people think it is Delta, and don't know the difference. That is one reason ASA is slowly being repleced in ATL. Johney Penninicamp should know that all of the krap they pulled trying to get a new contract, which was due to them no doubt, could come back to haunt them when they look for new flying. I think United will stick with CHQ and TranStates---just because they have the planes and have been giving them feed already in IAD and ORD--and doing a better job than Mesa.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
Alright then, straight question: if you had your choice, who would you have do DAL's 76-seat RJ flying?
 
Airtran.


Bye Bye--General Lee

Sounds good to me. We'll get paid our SNB rate for it. Nothing like making more than your -88 Captains to fly an RJ. ;)
 
Sounds good to me. We'll get paid our SNB rate for it. Nothing like making more than your -88 Captains to fly an RJ. ;)

Keep that up, we will make sure we try to match it or better on our next contract in 09. Just like those Southwest corndogs---keep those rates there please! It can only help us in the long run.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom