Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Piedmont MEC rejected LTP Pay rates???

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Those CA rates don't seem too bad (they are higher than ASA's TA'd 70 seat CA rates through year 7) but the FO rates are awful. Has your NC never heard of paying FOs 60% of CA rates?

How many folks have been at Piedmont 18 or more years?
 
Management has a history of refusing to negotiate much in the way of FO rates. This was no different.
 
I know it's more than you guys are making at PSA. Hopefully shooting them down will help with that when you guys go to the table.

Now it could get interesting. The company doesn't necessarily have to come back to the table if they're serious about getting some new metal. Our contract allows them to fly a new airplane on the property with no rates in place for a specified amount of time, then go to arbitration on the rates (I think that's how it works anyway. Could be mistaken). One of several different scenarios could play out.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top