xjgearbtch
Living the dream
- Joined
- May 27, 2006
- Posts
- 386
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you explain how these two sentences aren't contradictory?
Whether those CL-65-900s go to Mesaba or not depends on Mesaba taking the flow through - yes?
ALPA is therefore whipsawing Mesaba pilots with airframes to get furlough protection for the mainliners.
The point is that those Eagle pilots at Northwest and Comair aren't at American and they're not waiting to flow to American.
Back in the day when Eagle and Continental Express both had flow through agreements, their attrition rates were greater than that of Comair. If flow through is the career advancement vehicle you want us to believe it is, how do you account for that?
Turning junior pilots at another airline into your furlough fodder by witholding flying if they don't acquiesce has no place in a union. In other words, when mainline MECs conspire with management and start deriving a perceived benefit from alter egos, it's over - the union is mortally wounded.
From what I understand there has been about one flowup in history that ever worked.
Do the current NWA furloughs go to XJ and Compass, or just Compass?
I know of a number of flow downs, but has a pilot ever flown up in the history of aviation?
Yes...but thankfully, I don't have too. Everybody but you understands them.
1) How the Mesaba MEC rules on the issue of the flow thru has no impact on the status of the -900's. 2) The status of those jets depends on how the Northwest MEC would respond to a "veto" by the Mesaba MEC.
If Mesaba rejects the flow thru...the flow thru dies. At that point, the Northwest MEC must decide whether or not the remaining elements of the deal are "go" or "no go".
Hey all you RJDC guys... why don't you start a new thread titled - "how to beat a dead horse". I am so sick of all your rhetoric. It seems like every other XJ thread gets hijacked by you guys. GET A LIFE!!!!
Great - so can anybody here explain to me why the following two sentences are not contradictory?
I think a lot more people would consider flow- (trickle-?) through if we could at least get a weentsy bit of longevity. Maybe simply to avoid first-year pay.
One of my concerns is that Mesaba pilots will patiently wait their turns at flow-through while Pinnacle will fill the other seats of the class. Sadly, I might get on with Northwest more quickly if I quit Mesaba, get hired by Pinnacle, and then go to NWA. Not to say 9E guys shouldn't fill the other seats, but just that they are the likeliest candidates.
Someone might say, yeah, but then you won't have flow-back. I wouldn't? What about Compass? Aren't they basically an accumulator for mainline? Oops, too much pressure in the mainline actuator, shoot 'em back down to the Compass accumulator.
I thought part of the reason we didn't do flow about ten years ago was that we were more likely to get hired without a flow than with. In 2001, Mesaba was losing 20 a month at least to NWA.
So if your are NW pilot being furloughed do you have a choice of which airline you flow down into...ie Compass or Mesaba? Since we both have flow thru arrangements. How is it decided as to which regional get's the furloughs... assuming each airline has placed pilots at mainline property due to a flow up.
2. I don't quite understand the Pinnacle-is-quicker comment. Are you saying that route would lead to higher PIC totals quicker...meaning a stronger app? I'm fairly-well connected to the hiring process and I haven't seen or heard anything that suggests PCL pilots would be given quicker access to our eventual hiring.
I've seen the Membership summaries from that period, and we never hired 20 MSA pilots per month. During a brief period of peak hiring, it was more like 10-12.
I don't think it would be to much to ask to go in at second year pay. If there is a flow back what pay scale are they going to flow to.
Good info, thanks.
My point about Pinnacle is that if they don't have a restriction 3/month or 9/month or 10%/yr, etc., it could sadly be easier to get on with NWA if I was anywhere other than Mesaba. I'd guess attrition at Mesaba to NWA was greatest in spring 2001. If it was only 10-12, then that's not too bad, but the restrictions on the flow will still be stricter than that.
My fear is that NW HR will do what they did years back and say, "Mesaba resumes go in this file (the circular one on the floor), and everyone else goes in this file."
NWA is still my #1 choice, and I just don't want Skippy McIPod getting there before me because he worked somewhere else.
( I remember five Saab CA's coming off the list and going every month in 2000 in DTW alone), NWA was taking us at around 500 to 1000 pic on the saab, so a junior captain had a chance.
NWA is still my #1 choice, and I just don't want Skippy McIPod getting there before me because he worked somewhere else.