Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DELTA vs SWA from another thread....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
SWA has always had the most competitive rates for flying, either they go down or the industry comes up. In my opinion, the rates at SW will likely freeze until the rest of industry matches it. SW used to have more productive pilots flying more hours for less money in the 80's and 90's. Today the major pilots work the same as SW pilots at less pay. It's economy 101 that you can sustain that rate in this type of market.

I've read your dire warnings for years, Mr. PhD of Airplanes. Yet quarter after quarter since pay and benefits have gone down at all the Legacies, we don't see the effect you have predicted. We see higher costs due to hub inefficiencies, fleet mix issues and debt problems at the Legacies. We've seen JetBlue stumble and now they have high debt for their size.

Airtran and USAir are the only immediate sources of trouble on the horizon. Is that what you are referring to?


How many more quarters until it all comes true???? Just give us a rough guess.
 
Last edited:
Pay go up? Maybe. But right now it is only wishful thinking. IMHO, not a good bet. I just caught you speeding again General. Not a fact at all.

Looking better? Absolutely. I am very happy my buds at DAL have a very good future ahead. Note that does not mean without bumps--see below.

Growth ahead? Yes. But the usual caveat remains. Growth can slow with little notice. Not something to be counted on.

You'll argue how I'm all wet General, but the economy is rapidly slowing down. Growth will be tenuous at best.

Not a good bet, eh? We will get a raise of 1.5% every year for the next couple as per the contract, and up to 6% a year if we are profitable. So, regardless, you are wrong, it is a fact---via the contract. I know accountants can try to play with numbers, but this is all pre-tax---if we have a profit we will increase the 1.5% to something more, up to 6% (each year). If we have another 9-11, then everything is off the table, including your job and mine.

Growth? Yes, we have the orders and more to come. (all rumors of course..................) Really.......

Yes, the economy is slowing. But, we have cleaned up in BK, and we are ready to compete when others are slowing down (UAL cutting domestic capacity by 2%). We cut too much pre-BK and have added too many RJs, and our management knows that. We cut our leases from $280,000 a month on each MD88 to $80,000. We are poised to go forward and we aren't parking any more planes (we already did that--737-200s, 737-300s etc). Things are looking up.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
I find it interenting that some folks cite the "excitiment" of the flying as a reason to choose an airline to work for. I've done almost every kind of flying there is (I'm still waiting for a chance to fly an airship) and ALL airline flying is boring. That is kind of the point, isn't it? We work hard to make everying as "canned" and routine as possible. If you want excitment go fly helicopters off of oil rigs. Make sure you keep your life insurance paid up if you do.

Delta is a fine company with a checkered past and too many paint schemes, but it might have a great future. If you've never travelled and you've never flown a big airplane (and those things matter to you) consider Delta.
I'd recommend SWA for the stability and growth. But this business is crazy, and there are no guarantees. Odds are if you come to SWA you'll see constant growth and profits. Odds are the only way you'll get to fly widebody international is to go with Delta. Either or both predictions could be wrong.

General Lee paints a rosy picture, but he never gives a very balanced view when either Delta or SWA are mentioned.... Take him with a grain of salt and SWA/FO with 2 grains and you might have am accurate picture.

The best reason to go Delta is probably because you've wanted to since you were 5.
 
Last edited:
I've read your dire warnings for years, Mr. PhD of Airplanes. Yet quarter after quarter since pay and benefits have gone down at all the Legacies, we don't see the effect you have predicted. We see higher costs due to hub inefficiencies, fleet mix issues and debt problems at the Legacies. We've seen JetBlue stumble and now they have high debt for their size.

Airtran and USAir are the only immediate sources of trouble on the horizon. Is that what you are referring to?


How many more quarters until it all comes true???? Just give us a rough guess.
It has already come true, the only reason SW is not in the red right now is because they have enough cash on hand to pay down debts. They had $4 billion in cash and investments at the start of 2005, today they have $1.7 billion in cash and none in investments. After the rest of this years stock buy backs and equipment updates, they will have zero cash on hand. A total loss of $4 billion over the last 3 years just like every other airline.

Things SW normally pays cash for, i.e. airplanes, ground equipment, gates, advertising fees, office supplies, investments, gates, maintenance parts, stock buy backs, etc... will all enter the cash flow and become long term debt. The cash flow however will be in the red in 2008 leading to an almost certain bankruptcy by 2009 or so.
 
WN pays more now, and will probably continue to pay well for the foreseeable future, they're financially stable, and behind UPS in my view the best job in aviation IF YOU DON'T MIND FLYING 737's AROUND THE US THE REST OF YOUR LIFE!
 
I personally just like to stay in my country that has a habeas corpus. Int'l is way overrated.

Once again, each to their own. I can tell you that after talking to many of the fine folks that have done domestic and international pax operations, the overwhelming sentiment is that international is what they enjoy most. Sure the legs are longer but you also get paid to sleep for part of that flight which aint such a bad thing. I talked to a 747 pax driver last night, he said its a totally different world from the MD80 flying he used to do domesticaly. With the ability to go back to some comfortable quarters during the flight, eat a first class meal, relax, get some sleep, read, watch a movie, etc. then back up for a few more hours of flying before a really nice layover somewhere that you mostly just see on TV has been a good deal for him. Its not uncommon that he would take his wife or family members along to explore/shop/eat with during these trips.

I suspect some of the folks that instantly say international is over-rated, either did it in the military, which is a totally different animal all together or a second tier freight hauler which again is something entirely different from what a pilot would expect to experience at Delta. There are many trips at Delta that crew planners refer to simply as "paid vacation" because of the cities and layover time. Again, not slamming SWA because for what they are, its a nice pay check and some good people, but for those folks trying to figure out where to go, try thinking long term and figure out ways you can stay interested in a job that has sunk to a low spot these past several years. As you were....
 
Last edited:
I have to admit, too much of a good thing also can be a burnout.. I fly ONLY international and it gets a bit old dealing with the idiot HF "controllers" and cluster F$%K hand offs.. so ideally, I'd want to be able to mix it up..
 
I have to admit, too much of a good thing also can be a burnout.. I fly ONLY international and it gets a bit old dealing with the idiot HF "controllers" and cluster F$%K hand offs.. so ideally, I'd want to be able to mix it up..

FMS-Speed, just as a reference point, do you mind if I ask who you fly for? United?
 
Pay go up? Maybe. But right now it is only wishful thinking. IMHO, not a good bet. I just caught you speeding again General. Not a fact at all.

Looking better? Absolutely. I am very happy my buds at DAL have a very good future ahead. Note that does not mean without bumps--see below.

Growth ahead? Yes. But the usual caveat remains. Growth can slow with little notice. Not something to be counted on.

You'll argue how I'm all wet General, but the economy is rapidly slowing down. Growth will be tenuous at best.

The economy is actually not slowing down - look at the stock market (sets records every other day). Housing has cooled but there are indications that housing levels are starting to rebound - it still might take some time though. Interest rates have not increased indicating that inflation is not yet a problem. If the US economy really tanked (including fuel prices skyrocket even higher), all domestic airlines would be adversely impacted because there isn't much room to increase yields in this competitive LCC environment...

However, growth is still happening abroad and Delta should be capturing a lot of it as it continues to expand internationally. International growth can also partially subsidize domestic operations. You have more discretion with internationl margins because you have fewer nonstop competitors. Delta's product is a lot better than that of many government-owned airlines (i.e., South America and Africa) and its feed/networking-ability through ATL, JFK and LAX provides a compelling reason to fly Delta - you can get from Moscow or Dubai to Gainsville with one stop. If you want growth right now, Delta is correctly chasing it internationally while SWA is looking to add more airplanes/capacity to existing hyper-competitive routes. With the unreserved seating (cattle car boarding) and lack of IFE, can SWA compete with other new LCCs offering similar fares and departure times?

Think about it, how high will domestic airfares be a few years from now after SWA adds another hundred 737-700s, JetBlue adds 50 more A320s and 30 more E190s, Skybus adds 40 A319s, Virgin America adds 30 A320s, AirTran adds 50 more 737-700s (probably putting them on Midwest's network), Spirit adds 30 more A319s, Frontier adds 20 more A319s and 20 addtional E170s, Republic adds 100 more E170s for UAL, USAirways and DAL, etc.? Margins will be miniscule at best with so much competition. SWA needs to differentiate itself fast. International growth and a great domestic feed/network should help to reduce the domestic margin squeeze for airlines like Delta and CAL at the very least. It should be interesting to watch.

If you really want to reduce your career risk, go fly a Citation X or a GIVSP for Netjets/NJI - it is solidly the fractional market leader by a wide margin (Warren Buffet can't be wrong) and there will always be plenty of rich people out there willing to throw their money around...
 
Last edited:
It has already come true, the only reason SW is not in the red right now is because they have enough cash on hand to pay down debts. They had $4 billion in cash and investments at the start of 2005, today they have $1.7 billion in cash and none in investments. After the rest of this years stock buy backs and equipment updates, they will have zero cash on hand. A total loss of $4 billion over the last 3 years just like every other airline.

Things SW normally pays cash for, i.e. airplanes, ground equipment, gates, advertising fees, office supplies, investments, gates, maintenance parts, stock buy backs, etc... will all enter the cash flow and become long term debt. The cash flow however will be in the red in 2008 leading to an almost certain bankruptcy by 2009 or so.


So your pushing back your almost certain Bankruptcy projection unitl 2009? I am glad because you really had me worried with 6 month one you put out about a year ago. The only reason SWA has less cash on hand is because that's the way they want it. Your a genious YPF! Your going to be Legacy Management someday!
 
Whatever you do-- make sure it's your decision.
Everyone has an opinion- but succeed or fail- if it's your decision and not coerced by everyone's thoughts on the subject-- you can live with the results. IMO- it's a question of good and better- which company is which is taste. Ie: you can fly a 73 at delta... you can't fly a 777 at swa. But SWA has that great corporate culture that confuses every other pilot- 'I don't get it?-You WANT to work that hard? And you're happier?' But what'll it be in 20 years? Just remember you're in a good position having to make this choice.

I do have a question for all major pilots- IS int'l truly better or is it another case of the fantasy being different from the reality??... I'm young and single and don't like being away that much- I've always wanted to be an int'l pilot- but now-- i'd think i'd rather be home and live normal with locals and 2-days. I don't have that experience though. But I do agree wholeheartedly with Jball2- i don't care if i'm in Fargo-- if my crew is great-- it'll be a good overnight.. and good when flying too...
 
Whatever you do-- make sure it's your decision.
Everyone has an opinion- but succeed or fail- if it's your decision and not coerced by everyone's thoughts on the subject-- you can live with the results. IMO- it's a question of good and better- which company is which is taste. Ie: you can fly a 73 at delta... you can't fly a 777 at swa. But SWA has that great corporate culture that confuses every other pilot- 'I don't get it?-You WANT to work that hard? And you're happier?' But what'll it be in 20 years? Just remember you're in a good position having to make this choice.

I do have a question for all major pilots- IS int'l truly better or is it another case of the fantasy being different from the reality??... I'm young and single and don't like being away that much- I've always wanted to be an int'l pilot- but now-- i'd think i'd rather be home and live normal with locals and 2-days. I don't have that experience though. But I do agree wholeheartedly with Jball2- i don't care if i'm in Fargo-- if my crew is great-- it'll be a good overnight.. and good when flying too...

Well, at Delta you would have the option to try both - international and domestic. Try 767ER flights out of JFK/ATL for a year or two and then get back to domestic flying if you don't like it. It's all about options...
 
Not a good bet, eh? We will get a raise of 1.5% every year for the next couple as per the contract, and up to 6% a year if we are profitable. So, regardless, you are wrong, it is a fact---via the contract. I know accountants can try to play with numbers, but this is all pre-tax---if we have a profit we will increase the 1.5% to something more, up to 6% (each year).

It didn't know you meant the contractual raises. I thought you meant bigger raises like AA is trying to negotiate.

Good on you for posting facts. :)
 
............if they stay in business.

Delta will be tops in everything, should take ALPA not more then 18 months to get it all back. Quicker if the Delta Pilots get off all fours and tell the Kompany kernals & Kommanders to get off thier backs. :eek:

Must be hard to fly even one leg with someone pounding on your backside like that, all this while they take money out of your wallet. :cartman: Oh the shame...

the SWA/FO :pimp:

You know, you don't have to be a prick all the time!
 
I just hope SWA takes care of "our house." To the Delta dudes - give 'er hell. I hope you get $300 an hour. Seriously. I really do.

Gup
 
Left Delta a year ago for SWA. Time will tell if it was a good decision. Really tired of hearing though-Who wants to fly a 737 for the rest of their lives and you'll never get to fly internationaly. Who cares? Just give me a stable place to work, Cheap medical and dental, six figure income, five to six years to Captain, Profit sharing, industry leading 401k match, and oh ya, I get to go to work with people who want to be there. Much nicer place to work. Got wore out with the doom and gloom at Delta. Still have lots of friends there. Hope moral is picking up.
 
It has already come true, the only reason SW is not in the red right now is because they have enough cash on hand to pay down debts. They had $4 billion in cash and investments at the start of 2005, today they have $1.7 billion in cash and none in investments. After the rest of this years stock buy backs and equipment updates, they will have zero cash on hand. A total loss of $4 billion over the last 3 years just like every other airline.

Things SW normally pays cash for, i.e. airplanes, ground equipment, gates, advertising fees, office supplies, investments, gates, maintenance parts, stock buy backs, etc... will all enter the cash flow and become long term debt. The cash flow however will be in the red in 2008 leading to an almost certain bankruptcy by 2009 or so.

Thank God! We'll finally get all of that debt we need! I can stop finally worrying about an LBO!!!!

"Friend" your predictions are the funniest thing I've seen on the internet since that one thing on you tube ...
 
Whatever you do-- make sure it's your decision.
Everyone has an opinion- but succeed or fail- if it's your decision and not coerced by everyone's thoughts on the subject-- you can live with the results. IMO- it's a question of good and better- which company is which is taste. Ie: you can fly a 73 at delta... you can't fly a 777 at swa. But SWA has that great corporate culture that confuses every other pilot- 'I don't get it?-You WANT to work that hard? And you're happier?' But what'll it be in 20 years? Just remember you're in a good position having to make this choice.

I do have a question for all major pilots- IS int'l truly better or is it another case of the fantasy being different from the reality??... I'm young and single and don't like being away that much- I've always wanted to be an int'l pilot- but now-- i'd think i'd rather be home and live normal with locals and 2-days. I don't have that experience though. But I do agree wholeheartedly with Jball2- i don't care if i'm in Fargo-- if my crew is great-- it'll be a good overnight.. and good when flying too...

INTL flying is flying over to Europe with a first class buffet, followed by happy hour with crew after a nice nap. If you have to go somewhere for 3 days or maybe 4, why not do it in Venice or Athens? Do you really need to go to Boise again? For those who may complain the time zones take years off of your life, remember---so do 5 legs a day with 25 minute turns. INTL flying also usually has an extra crew member on hand, so each of you get to rest in a first class seat or crew rest area and watch a movie eating a first class meal (yes, that is in our contract, it has to be a first class meal). (anything over 5 1/2 hours has to provide you a 1st class meal, even on domestic) It really is all about choice, and domestic flying with even more choises is waiting for you if you don't like it. You can even choose to fly a 737 for the rest of your life at Delta too, if you really want to....?


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Left Delta a year ago for SWA. Time will tell if it was a good decision. Really tired of hearing though-Who wants to fly a 737 for the rest of their lives and you'll never get to fly internationaly. Who cares? Just give me a stable place to work, Cheap medical and dental, six figure income, five to six years to Captain, Profit sharing, industry leading 401k match, and oh ya, I get to go to work with people who want to be there. Much nicer place to work. Got wore out with the doom and gloom at Delta. Still have lots of friends there. Hope moral is picking up.

Who cares? You will care eventually. We do have a lot of plans coming up supposedly, so you may have jumped the gun. Regardless, I hope you enjoy your new job. Moral is picking up, especailly after we got our claim checks.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top