Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But the money is needed for the poor people.
If only that were true. It's needed to satisfy the greedy, power-drunk individuals who are the federal government and as pay back the lobbyists from the ATA and the airlines who think this will help them. It will surely deal a serious blow to light GA. One that will have significant negative trickle-down effects to suppliers and manufacturers alike. The results will be much less GA, higher prices and reduced safety as the remaining GA pilots will be driven out of the system into scud running.Sadly, I think the money is needed for Iraq.
BTW, how is NavCanada doing these days?
Well, IMVHO, I wouldn't agitate your airline management or ALPA on this one! They don't care and unless you know an executive type, have no involvement.I agree whole-heartedly with you Lowpass. I support AOPA and really hope they can fight this off... however the proponents pockets are very deep, and we know that money talks and.... walks.
What do airline pilots and ALPA think about user fees? Perhaps they should let management know their opinions.
AOPA is probably the only reason we have the strongest GA sector in the world, but we are such an easy target because we are so rich and it always easy to take money away from rich people.
My prediction is if GW gets these user fees put in place, the cost of flying will become prohibitive for too many people. Many flight schools will go out of business and the number of new student pilot starts will drop dramatically eventually causing a pilot shortage. For those who continue to fly I think you will see a lot of VFR flights operating without flight following and safety will be diminished. I really don't see a positive spin to user fees. But what do I know - I'm just a pilot!
BTW, how is NavCanada doing these days?
Because they need the increased accident rate to justify the total ban on general aviation they plan to enact around 2012. They need the GA ban to create the pilot shortage that will justify replacing pilots with computers in 2020.This is just a horrible idea on so many levels it's amazing that it's even still being considered.
"Bonanza 123AB, you're Visa just maxed out, squawk VFR, radar service terminated, have a good day"
Haha or better yet "Bonanza 123AB, radar contact please squawk the last 4 digits of any major credit card".
While I am against paying user fees, what I am really against is the pain in the ass it will be to pay the user fees. Do I get a bill at my house, how do they tell who was flying such and such N number, etc. Seems to me it is going to take a lot more money to collect $20 then $20.
As a former flight insturctor this sucks. But as an airline pilot this would be a dream come true. The cost would put the cost of flight training out of the hands of most new and hopeful pilots, thus continuing to decrease the amount of professional pilots around the country. What would happen next would be that the airlines would have to now compete to attract new pilots to the airlines. Thus wages go up, and QOL goes up. I never thought that I would say this, but I am pro-user fees, and I understand that it is for very selfish reasons. Just my .02
Like I said above, it was for selfish reasons, but yes I do care about me! And yes I would have been able to afford flight training under the proposed user fees, although I agree many will not be able to, and it will pretty much be the death of GA in this country(which again I am OK with)Thank god the world revolves around you. Bury GA and our personal freedoms for a chance for you to advance in your career. Would you have been able to afford flight training under the proposed user fees?
What a f%^king tool. Get back to your Replacement Jet and delusions of grandeur.