slowtation capt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2003
- Posts
- 445
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I'm not a leader but at least I take an active role. Again it sounds like more complaining from you
You know what Shane I'm not going to call any regular joe pilot unprofessional or a backstabber simply for interpreting the writing on the wall and acting accordingly. Flexjet has become a dog eat dog kind of place after the transfers arrived, especially the Global and Gulfstream ones who stole what didn't rightfully belong to them, a trend was set in motion. Additionally, since ass kissing has always been a job requirement in our "culture" and it appears to be an even greater concern in our new environment, I'll refrain from judgement there too. It's well known Flexjet employed a hiring algorithm for years and part of what you are seeing regarding the lack of vocal union suppprt is that matrix being played out but trust me it is there and growing.
So I'm going to cut those regular joe pilots a break. They are wrong. They are self serving. They are suck ups. But I will still cut them a break. Additionally, I know for a fact there are many quietly union supportive people who are in Red Label because they saw union leaders on the list and felt like that was a signal it was okay and not really as bad as the rhetoric said it was. Which brings me to the real issue.
The real issue for me is what appears to be union leadership (I'm talking every pilot responsible for bringing the union here whether they are currently active or not) not being held to the same standard of sacrificial behavior they are asking of the rest of us. That is shameful.
I am grateful for the union being here as we have seen a complete degradation of our standards in the few years Ricci has had us. I can't imagine what he would have done unfettered. However, that gratefulness can really only be applied to a handful of people at this point. We all know who they are and they are not getting the credit they deserve. But I'll tell you one identifying factor is you will not see their name on the Red Label list.
By having your name on the red label list you are showing support for a program that was intended to decimate the very thing we should all hold in reverence, which is seniority. The fact is, regardless of whatever shenagins of transparency management is currently playing it is still not seniority based. The situation with DS made that clear. And don't try to tell me the Legacy is a different program / new fleet rules because the fact is we have Captains on that plane who would be FOs on another fleet or have no where near the seniority necessary to hold the position. For a minute I was lulled into complacency with several arguments defending it but they've all played out to an illogical end.
The argument I particularly love from one poc turncoat is that these red label leaders are "taking one for the team" by being in Red Label. They claimed by being in the program they have the opportunity to reach our more resistant pilots. They also mentioned they are helping to raise the overall base pay average which will only help in what is guaranteed to be a disappointing arbitration (an argument I find baseless if we supported our negotiating process with any gusto). That is laughable. What they and other red label pilots are doing is laying the groundwork for more furloughs (if we are to believe Ricci which I don't but that's beside the point) and creating more work for those left behind. How can a union leader stand behind a program that a.) Decimates seniority b.) Jeopardizes jobs c.) Increases workload d.) Creates more layers that divide pilots and e.) mask transparency just to name a few.
In my opinion only 2 things can happen now to correct this situation. Red Label leadership should resign until they can run for office or they should just encourage EVERYONE to get on the list and try to put a kink in Ricci's plan. Unfortunately, everyone being on the list won't solve the problems Red Label causes (or punish those who already jumped the line) but that would right a a few of the wrongs and set the union up for a good argument regarding integration methodology that would force either bypass pay, lab conditions violations and/or a shuffling nightmare for management when the time comes.
As distasteful as it is, by asking everyone to get on the list it takes away the power of the list. The fact is if the program had been initially boycotted we wouldn't be in the mess we are today. So the next best move might be to destroy the list by essentially making it the seniority list.
There is more support than you know at Flexjet. It's not vocal but it's there and growing. However is is happening in spite of what these particular union leaders have done. Unilaterally you will hear every pilot here whether they support the union or not feels having leadership on red label is a black eye to the union and has hurt the effort (and them personally) tremendously.
Well damn I was wrong about you
"especially the Global and Gulfstream ones who stole what didn't rightfully belong to them" I gotta argue that statement Those airplanes didn't belong to you as much as they belonged to us, they used those airplanes to divide. For how many years did Flexjet talk of buying Gulfstreams? or Globals? I know Kenn talked for years about Gulfstreams? Never Globals so you might have the Globals on us However we all thought Options would be flying Gulfstreams Now after Kenn buys Flexjet and buys Gulfstreams in reality that should have been split down the list in seniority but no he didn't do that So I am sorry but to say those airplanes are yours in wrong, for us to say they are ours, well we have a little bit more to the history to say it, but we can't go claiming exclusivity on it
Have at them. But I don't see the outcome being any different since no matter how you slice it Kenn was going to make sure his boot lickers got the slots.
Slowtation, I think we potentially agree on the large cabin issue but for different passions. To me this is a seniority debate, to you a fences issue.
Tomato Tomato. It's all still wrong.
I never understood why the citation air deal vilified the union so much when it seemed to me they made the only ethical choice. But now I recognize Kenn is reallt good the PR game most of us are too dumb to avoid.
There would be no debate about the seniority for any aircraft on our side of the fence, because we have a contract in place. That is precisely why Mr. Ricci is putting all new aircraft on the Flexjet side of the fence. Just another way to screw with the two pilot groups and pit us against one another.