YourPilotFriend
YourPilotFriend
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2005
- Posts
- 1,570
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will the flow-backs be to regional captain or to the street?
NWA flow-backs will be to VP-Flight Ops...the bottom of the managment barrel.
(Use the parchment style paper for the resume...wonky HR dorks love that look!)
Sure the scope was more lax in 1988 at 70 seats, but look at the lift available. The only airframes in that seat range were something along the line of Convairs , which NWA just got done parking, and RJs weren't even a glimer in someone's eye. With that scope, they COULD have outsourced the DC-9-10s, but back in the day there really weren't that many competent "regional" DC-9 operators out there.
The real scope issue shouldn't have been concentrating on seats, but rather the range/lift/speed equation. If they want to outsource a 30 seat jet to the coast or a 50 seat ATR to Rochester, fine, but set it up so the mainline captures the "fat" part of the curve.
I think the era of the senior guys running things is at an end. The pilot group is POed, and the knuckleheads fighting the TDC are only pissing gasoline on the fire. If the "grantor trust" issue is any indication, the pilot group is in a "ready, fire, aim" kind of mood, and one more misstep by the powers that be will make things unconfortable.
Then I won't see any MSA or PCL pilots interviewing at NWA later this year?
Care to wager on that?
There must be something there, else we wouldn't have a need to protect it.
Then we're all agreed! There is no threat. No Airlink pilot is willing to fly the DC-9 for $123/hr. That's settled.
Glad to hear it!
And they won't be working for anything less if hired at NWA.....until your senior pilots decide they will for them.
No wonder so many of your furloughs told NW to go suck eggs and are at fractionals or selling cars.