Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

"With you" "With you" "With you"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
PAPA FOX! said:
I totally agree "with you" on that. Other phrases that annoy me are:
1) "Checking in"
2) "Got em on the fishfinder"
3) "USAIR 321 2,000 for 4,000"
Yeah, "got em on the fishfinder" that's another winner.
When ATC calls traffic, you either have visual contact, or you don't. That's the only thing ATC wants to hear from you.

If you have visual contact, they can tell you to maintain visual seperation, or at the very least they can stop calling the traffic if you're not going to collide (there are situations when even though 2 airplanes may have altitude seperation, ATC is required to call the traffic and keep calling it until you see it, or you pass.) So telling the controller you "have em on TCAS" tells the controller nothing useful, and wastes time You may have noticed that even though somone calls "got em on the TCAS", the controller keeps giving point outs on the traffic.

"Got em on the TCAS" is a pointless waste of time,

"Got em on the fishfinder" is a pointless waste of time and it sounds exceptionally stupid.
 
say again said:
The beautiful Shakira!!!!!:blush:
was that her on SNL last night. Good singer, but she looks like she's about 4 feet tall.
 
say again said:
The beautiful Shakira!!!!!:blush:
Didn't I already answer that like, two pages ago! Thats what gets me, people who don't read, then answer something that has already been answered!
just kiddin. This would be where the cheers thingy goes, but don't know how to do it.


AK
 
AngelKing said:
Didn't I already answer that like, two pages ago! Thats what gets me, people who don't read, then answer something that has already been answered!
just kiddin. This would be where the cheers thingy goes, but don't know how to do it.


AK

Don't know?? I answered after I saw his question. Sorry to rain on your parade!!!:beer: I'll cheers to ya.

I think she's 4'11". And her body is FINE, as is her a$$!!!!
 
say again said:
Don't know?? I answered after I saw his question. Sorry to rain on your parade!!!:beer: I'll cheers to ya.

I think she's 4'11". And her body is FINE, as is her a$$!!!!

nooo nooo nooo I answered with post #49.. See how pathetic my life is, but then I have my priorities straight, I knew exactly who Shakira was, but couldn't care less about who says "with you". Oh, and cheers!
AK
 
Last edited:
ATTENTION, ATTENTION:

THE ONLY CORRECT TIME TO USE THE PHRASE- "WITH YOU" IS WHEN CHECKING IN WITH THE SAME CONTROLLER ON A DIFFERENT FREQUENCY.

WHEN A CONTROLLER SAYS:
"SWITCH TO MY FREQUENCY", THAT IS YOUR CUE TO USE YOUR FAVOURITE LITTE PHRASE, "WITH YOU", AFTER YOU HAVE SWITCHED TO THE NEW FREQ.

I BETTER NOT HEAR ANYMORE ABOUT THIS.

BREAKER-BREAKER, OVER AND OUT.
 
Oakum_Boy said:
ATTENTION, ATTENTION:

THE ONLY CORRECT TIME TO USE THE PHRASE- "WITH YOU" IS WHEN CHECKING IN WITH THE SAME CONTROLLER ON A DIFFERENT FREQUENCY.

WHEN A CONTROLLER SAYS:
"SWITCH TO MY FREQUENCY", THAT IS YOUR CUE TO USE YOUR FAVOURITE LITTE PHRASE, "WITH YOU", AFTER YOU HAVE SWITCHED TO THE NEW FREQ.

I BETTER NOT HEAR ANYMORE ABOUT THIS.

BREAKER-BREAKER, OVER AND OUT.
...I'm not WITH YOU on this one.
 
It's funny how the majority of people on here are violently against using with you, however, I hear the majority of 121 pilots using with you constantly.

I think we have some closet "with you" users on here.

It takes less than a nannosecond to say 'with you', so it's not like it's tying up the radio frequency or anything like that.
I think it's funny how some people, like the military guy from a prior post, take the term "with you" literally. Everybody know's that just because a pilot say's with you, that dosent mean that he is physically "with you" in the same room or anything. People who are so ignorant to think that with you literally means were sitting side by side are just being plain silly.
Jesus, don't let 2 words upset you so much!!

I personally follow rules and try to be a by the book type of pilot without being the anal know-it-all we all have to fly with sometimes. However, I'm not a renegade/cowboy pilot either. I personally don't see the problem in saying checking in or with you when changing over to a new center. When changing altitudes or in the approach phase of a flight, standard phraseology is alot more important. Personally, I've said with you a thousand times, I've also said checking in, and all the others. I'll bet the majority of pilots on here are guilty of saying all of them too. Anyway, just my .02 worth :nuts:
 
blingair said:
only if you have teepee for my bunghole

You have awakened my bunghole and now you must pay - The streets will flow with the blood of the unbelievers
 
My favorite on is when ATC instructs you to ident and the Pilot says, "Here comes the flash". You don't hear this one very often but I love it when I do.
 
av8er23 said:
My favorite on is when ATC instructs you to ident and the Pilot says, "Here comes the flash". You don't hear this one very often but I love it when I do.

Ha ha.

Here's my fav. Someone told me that they heard center ask an old crusty airline pilot how the rides were and the pilots response was: "Well, I'll put it to you like this....If I was pickin' my nose, I'd be puttin' my eye out"

I about keeled over:laugh:
 
blingair said:
...I'm not WITH YOU on this one.

Me either...I still don't use "With You" for that.

APP: Cessna 123, switch to my frequency 123.55
*switch*
Me: Approach, Cessna 123 on 123.55

No "with you" there...

-mini
 
AngelKing said:
God has spoken, he doesn't say "with you" but still uses "over and out".



Tonight at my church we had a Christmas concert. The pastor said twice that Jesus Christ is "WITH YOU" tonight. How bout that one!!
 
minitour said:
Me either...I still don't use "With You" for that.

APP: Cessna 123, switch to my frequency 123.55
*switch*
Me: Approach, Cessna 123 on 123.55

No "with you" there...

-mini

I see! So you say because you don't use it, then it must be incorrect, correct? That logic works only so long as you do not wish to continue the learning process. Does it not?
 
How about this

Center: Execjet xxx say ride conditions

Pilot: Eastbound, hammered down, without a frown.

(I'm not kidding either. Netjets Falcon 2000)
 
A Squared said:
Yeah, "got em on the fishfinder" that's another winner.
When ATC calls traffic, you either have visual contact, or you don't. That's the only thing ATC wants to hear from you.

.................ATC is required to call the traffic and keep calling it until you see it, or you pass.) So telling the controller you "have em on TCAS" tells the controller nothing useful, and wastes time You may have noticed that even though somone calls "got em on the TCAS", the controller keeps giving point outs on the traffic..........

Its also dangerous.
I read an NTSB report on a near-miss (don't even start on this if you don't know what it means) between a Cactus 73 and a 402. The controller admitted she stopped paying attention to the VFR 402 because the 73 said they had him on TCAS. The 73 guys ended up badly injuring a flight attendant attempting to get back to their altitude after the TCAS RA was over.

Since I saw the Oct or Nov "with you" thread I now use WITH YOU at every possible radio call just to piss off the tight a$$es who started this whole thing.:uzi:

AND if you say "flight level three, five, oh" instead of "zero" but biotch about "with you" then you are not only a hypocrite but a loser as well.

I suppose I shouldn't say "see ya" to the controllers either since I'll probably never see them?....................:p
 
Last edited:
minitour said:
On the hole - I believe it's "On to hold" and I've only heard that from military guys here...SOP for them?

Well then you don't do much flying out of ATL. And yes, I believe it's Air Force, where "pos and hold" is Navy. Of which we have neither flying into and out of ATL, yet you hear it several times an hour.
 
atrdriver said:
Well then you don't do much flying out of ATL. And yes, I believe it's Air Force, where "pos and hold" is Navy. Of which we have neither flying into and out of ATL, yet you hear it several times an hour.

Possibly former military? Just speculating of course, but that could be why.

-mini
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom