nwaredtail
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Posts
- 622
From what I read, DALALPA and DAL pilots on this forum feel that the DALALPA proposal of ratioed list was MORE than fair. They feel the career of a NWA will be enhance by becoming a DAL pilot, etc.
They also think that NWA was wayyyyyy out of line for thinking a slotted list, whereas a NWA pilot would move up when a fellow NWA pilot retires. DOH was never a proposal, by the way. NWA shouldn't get credit for 787's, retirements, etc.
DALALPA also likes to throw the past arbitrations of NWA and the industry, the older planes, etc.
So, if DALALPA feels so sure that their ideas and concepts are fair and justified, why wouldn't they think a neutral arbitrator would feel the same? I mean, surely a fair-minded, intelligent, seasoned arbitrator would see through all the bull that the NWA pilots have been spewing and side with DALALPA.
Seems to me, they aren't so sure.
They also think that NWA was wayyyyyy out of line for thinking a slotted list, whereas a NWA pilot would move up when a fellow NWA pilot retires. DOH was never a proposal, by the way. NWA shouldn't get credit for 787's, retirements, etc.
DALALPA also likes to throw the past arbitrations of NWA and the industry, the older planes, etc.
So, if DALALPA feels so sure that their ideas and concepts are fair and justified, why wouldn't they think a neutral arbitrator would feel the same? I mean, surely a fair-minded, intelligent, seasoned arbitrator would see through all the bull that the NWA pilots have been spewing and side with DALALPA.
Seems to me, they aren't so sure.