Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

White House & Capitol Evacuated

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I Aint Skeered

When is everyone going to settle down and take this for what it is? When President Clinton was in the White House a Cessna 152 crashed directly into the White House- and there was hardly a news blurb about it. With the news coverage they give 'Bushie' and those 'law breaking, FAR violating, general aviation pilots' that the National Guard was prepared to shoot down, got everyones panties in a wad. Who cares- REALLY? Has the threat environment really changed? No. Are mad men more likely to crash airplanes into the White House today than in 1997? No. Will Al-Qaeda or any other terrorist organization ever use another suicide airline attack again? No. Come on people, the terrorist are smart- and they go with the element of surprise. They've already been there, done that. But of course, anything to make the peon's feel 'safer' at the expense of civil liberty and the privlidge of plying the American skies. What happens in the skies over America should NOT be public. It should be privlidged information to law enforcement, defense, FAA, and airspace users. Just a thought- nobody cares about a 152. If we have a Gulfstream or bigger NORDO in P-40, then my ears will perk up...
 
Lowly CFI,

I agree the media is wrong more than they are correct, my source is pretty accurate because he knows the pilot. I also just heard on the news again that he was a CFI. I know this doesn't mean anything except that the media can't be trusted, neither can the FAA or their records. I guess we will just have to wait until the final report. Even those are scewed and full of errors. I think it best we all fly with a handheld GPS with battery backup to keep us out of situations like this. For less than 500 bucks you can save yourself a lot of grief. CFI or not, anyone that violates TFR's are just going to ruin it for everone else, I think they should have shot him down, then pilots would get the message.
 
Vladimir Lenin said:
i concur, quarter the old bastard and make /G a mandatory ADIZ equipment

Slash Golf is not the answer Mr. Garmin. A GPS can get you into as much trouble as it gets you out of. The problem is that GA was not responsible for the failure of the INS,CIA,FBI to keep track of aliens on expired Visas. Because the Government has egg on their collective faces, they choose to establish onerous airspace restrictions and hand out violations for equipment failure that we have no control over.

The government is operating in a knee-jerk reaction fashion. They have pulled the wool over the eyes of the public. The public thinks that If the government thinks GA is a risk then GA must be a risk and should be banned. That will stop the terrorist. Ban GA and remove those dangerous Cessna 150's out of the air. Do you know how Ryder truck responded to the OKC bombing. You must have a valid credit card to rent a Ryder truck now. This should stop the terrorist with bad credit.......
 
TDTURBO said:
Lowly CFI,

I agree the media is wrong more than they are correct, my source is pretty accurate because he knows the pilot. I also just heard on the news again that he was a CFI. I know this doesn't mean anything except that the media can't be trusted, neither can the FAA or their records. I guess we will just have to wait until the final report. Even those are scewed and full of errors. I think it best we all fly with a handheld GPS with battery backup to keep us out of situations like this. For less than 500 bucks you can save yourself a lot of grief. CFI or not, anyone that violates TFR's are just going to ruin it for everone else, I think they should have shot him down, then pilots would get the message.

How would you like a police officer to shoot you because you fail to use a turn signal. Maybe you went through a redlight and a police officer sees this and pulls up next to you and riddles you with bulletts. I mean after all, you know what a redlight means. You have been driving long enough to know that redlight runners are dangerous and have caused accidents in the past. Shooting you will send a message to all drivers that running a redlight will not be tolerated....
 
Hi there bud, this is the moron speaking.

flyifrvfr said:
You are a complete moron.

That explains why I'm responding to you, .........and why I still stay in this business. You and my ex-wife sure got me figured out.

I gather that you don't make your living in the Baltimore Washington airspace. I instruct out of Martin State Airport and have witnessed first hand the decrease in GA activity there as a result of the ADIZ. If the ADIZ were to be extended any further it would do nothing but kill GA in this area which is already hurting from the existing ADIZ. You can support more restrictions as long as it is not in your back yard.

You gather correctly, I suggest that you consider the effect on your precious GA activity if some terrorist actually uses a Cessna and hits something in the DC proper. It won't matter if he does any serious damage to the object he hits, the max damage will be to GA, probably nationwide.

I support increasing the no fly zones ADIZ specifically to help you keep that GA job. It may please you to know that I also support shutting down National, PERIOD. That would be in my back yard. I am willing to put my money where my mouth is, you apparently choose your wallet over national security. If you happen to have forgotten, the bad guys are out to get us, September 11 wasn't a single event.

You are no different from the idiots in the TSA and Homeland Security.

Now that hurts, deeply.

The ADIZ as it stands now has over-worked controllers who have to deal with the pilots who play by the rules and make a living in the ADIZ. As I said earlier, GA activity has decreased, but it has not yet died. Owners don't fly on a whim anymore, they need a reason to fly to justify the exposure to violations. In the ADIZ, if your transponder stops working you will be violated by the FAA and charged with numerous violations with the worst being careless and wreckless flying. I know of which I speak, I know many pilots who stopped flying after transponder failures earned them a violation. We have no way of knowing that the transponder has failed while we are flying and bingo, just like that, a record of careless and wreckless flying for what?

OK everyone listen up, flyifrvfr's finances have been hurt by airspace restrictions. Could someone please arrange for ADIZ to go away.

Brother, you sound like the radio commercials where a prospective home seller calls the NYSE and asks for the bell ringer. I'm sorry that you happen to live near the Capital. Maybe you need to consider moving to an area more conducive to continued flight training opportunites.

I have plans of flying for a regional and then going on to Netjets. Would Netjets hire me with this violation on my record? This is the risk I take each and everyday I fly in the ADIZ, and now you want to extend it or even an out-right ban just so you can fly in another part of the country, How ignorant and self centered!

How ignorant and celf centered! Wow, I couldn't have said it better myself.


GA is now the major pipeline to bigger and better things. I will explain this to you because you lack the brains to figure this out. I go to flight school and earn my CFI license. I then teach and build hours to move onto a 135 charter or 121 regional. I continue to pay my dues and land at a fractional which is where I want to be and worked so hard to get.

Darn, I never realized how a PROFESSIONAL AVIATOR came to be.Thanks for giving me that scoop.

How do you propose I earn my time to get to this level if non-commercial aviation was off limits.

How do you propose to earn your time if a terrorist happens to get as close to the Whitehouse as did this 150?

A very small portion of pilots come from the military which is the reverse of what was true long ago. I am too old to join the military, so I guess that my desire to fly is too bad because you want a ban on non-commercial aviation.

As I said, you are a complete moron.

Frankly my friend, your opinion of me doesn't matter. If we were face to face, maybe I could challenge you to a duel. But alas, we'll never meet. I had so hoped to be able to make your acquantance, in the mean time I'll just have to ask you to consider the effect on your livelyhood, and the freedoms of a lot of us if the next 150 happens to be piloted by a Atta wannabe?


To anyone who has read this far, I support increasing the ADIZ radius because that is the only way to give the F16's adequate time to assess the threat. I suspect that those to guys from PA came about fifteen seconds from eating lead. That would be tragic, and I expect that they would have had even less of a break had they been flying something like a Bonanza or Baron.

I know that some of us don't like to see the media/government take gratuitous potshots at an easy target like GA, but like it or not, they have the power to shut us down. If more stuff like this happens, I'm afraid that the restrictions will be much more severe than just increasing the ADIZ size around the DC area.

enigma
 
Enigma, if GA were to be shut down in the BAlto/Wash area, how long would it take to do that where you live? While you say you support a larger ADIZ, you give more ammunition to the terrorist because of your fear. Your reaction is exactly the same as the general public and that makes you as ignorant as they are.

If you think that a terrorist is going to use a Cessna 150 as a weapon you are sadly mistaken. In the late 90's a Cessna 150 did indeed hit the Whitehouse. The suicidal pilot decapitated himself and broke a window. In other words someone has been there and done that. How many airports do you think were harmed by the existing ADIZ? How many businesses will be lost under the blanket of national security? Are you more secure now that there is a ADIZ and FRZ around D.C.?

What would stop a terrorist from buying weapons and going to D.C. and shoot as many people on the streets as they can? Since this is a possibilty, should we ban all guns? What would stop a terrorist from spiking the food supply with chemicals? Should we ban all food? What I think of people like you would get me put in the penalty box for sure If I told you. AS for meeting me for a duel knowing that you live in fear brings me more joy than mere words could express. Fear, can you smell it???
 
How about instead of enlargin the ADIZ, or requiring IFR only or airline only or even /G required we do this:

You bust the airspace (with the current requirements and nothing more), they send up an "escort".
They send out the flares once. If you don't follow them, the only thing left of you is a vapor trail...

For IFR peeps, we can develope a published procedure for if/when you go NORDO in IMC and one for if you're VMC (specific airports to land at or get ouf of the ADIZ). Don't do it and you get the "escort". If you don't follow them, see above.

I'm okay with that. Is it a deterrent for me to fly around that area? Yeah! But does it mean GA will die in that area? Hardly. Lots of people will still be able to do what they do every day in that area.

MHO

-mini
 
After reading most of the posts regarding this topic its pretty clear that people on this board were in favor of the C150 getting shot down. I guess human life doesnt mean that much anymore and everyone in favor of this can honestly say they deserved it??? Does that really make any sense? Noone hear was in that plane that day and although one may wonder how the hell did they screw up that bad everyone makes mistakes. Should they get there tickets suspended, sure I agree with that. Revoked, so it sets an example for who?? Oh I get it we will revoke your ticket to set an example to make sure you never make a mistake like that again, might as well take humans out of the cockpit and use only UAV's, but wait dont computers mess up too? It was a bad day, a bad situation and yes I agree they should get there tickets suspended. I hightly doubt they did this intentionally. Why I am against a shootdown should be obvious and hell if Bush was gone the world IMHO would be a better place, yeah thats **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** right I said that! Someone on here posted that these pilots should never be in an airplane again, give me a **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** break. If you never made a mistake in your life then you have the right to say that I guess but I highly doubt it. IMHO again the more laws in the name of homeland security and no fly zones that are passed the tighter the noose around our necks. I am sure anyone can see that!
 
flyifrvfr said:
How would you like a police officer to shoot you because you fail to use a turn signal. Maybe you went through a redlight and a police officer sees this and pulls up next to you and riddles you with bulletts. I mean after all, you know what a redlight means. You have been driving long enough to know that redlight runners are dangerous and have caused accidents in the past. Shooting you will send a message to all drivers that running a redlight will not be tolerated....

Turn signal huh?

What are you talking about? Flying 3 miles from the white house is a little different than not using a turn signal. Anyone stupid enough to do what this pilot did deserves a SAM up his ass.
I doubt anyone would disagree with me either.

BTW: How do you like your avitar since you got it from me?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top