kfishgirl9
New member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Posts
- 4
I tried to stay away, but I gotta' bite on this pay raise issue...
While I stongly support a pay increase for all my former "freight dog" comrades, to use it as a solution to AMF's turnover situation is flawed. AMF is by essence a "stepping stone" for the vast majority of their pilots. Sure, there are a few who stick around, but not nearly enough to keep the place running. For most of us who left, it involved an initial pay cut so that we could move on to a position of higher prestige (big shiny jets, air conditioning, clean hands, flight attendants, etc). And yes, ther is a higher future earning potential.
But tell me honestly, if AMF offered you the same earning potential as an airline, would you still stick around, flying the old freighter, enduring your friends and family askng you if you are going to be a "commercial" pilot some day? I wouldn't. I'd still go for the prestige. Sure there may be a few who would stay, but would it be enough to keep the place going?
I have always found that a pay increase is a bad motivator. Sure the people who are there feel the initial boost and they are initially happier, but it fades in about 6 months. You also eventually have a new generation of pilots come in and the "new" pay increase is actually their base line. In time, they too will think a pay raise is a good idea. Eventually, you have a system of increasing cost for the same productivity...
Since Dogs Bollocks has been at AMF since I was first there (I think I know you), he can probably remember that the pay cale has actually been bumped up twice since we started, yet here we are again...
No, I really feel that AMF should accept itself for what it is regarding pilot retention (actually, they have always known it in BUR), but they could help a little with job enrichment such as improving schedules and more FOs.
Okay, this was waay too long. I'm done. Fire away...
I know this thread has been declared dead, but I just wanted to comment on the pay issue, because it's something that interests me. Pay is supposed to be occasionally raised. Just because a couple of pay raises have been issued in the past doesn't mean they shouldn't continue as the economy changes.
The issue isn't, at least to me, trying to compare regional airline pay to cargo pay, but cargo pay to cargo pay. As far as I've been able to determine, Ameriflight pays under the average pay for 135 cargo companies nowadays. They may offer decent maintenance and jumpseat privileges, but other cargo companies offer that as well.
From what I understand, Freight Runners Express starts pilots around $32,000 a year for 99 drivers. Aero Charter starts their pilots at $165 / a day for C310 and C402 drivers. Now, the latter may be high for the normal pay scale, but starting pilots at a few thousand dollars more a year, or offering them the choice between getting per diem and getting a hotel for the day seems reasonable to me. It wouldn't be something that would be incentive enough for a pilot to stay forever, but it would be incentive enough to stay longer... meaning slowing turnover a bit.